Friday, October 13th 2023

AMD Ryzen X3D Processors are Popular with TPU Readers, 23% Market Share: Poll Results

AMD Ryzen processors with 3D Vertical Cache technology, denoted with the "X3D" brand extension on processor model numbers, are showing unexpected popularity numbers with close to a quarter of respondents to a TechPowerUp Frontpage Poll question saying that they use one. In August, we asked our readers if they use a Ryzen X3D processor. The question was "Are you using an AMD Ryzen X3D CPU with 3D V-Cache?" This was a few months into the launch of the Ryzen 7000X3D processor series that restored the gaming performance leadership for AMD against Intel's 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" processors.

Since the poll went live in August, we've seen 31,862 responses. From these, 14,732, or 46% say that they use a classic Ryzen processor (one without 3D V-cache). followed by 9,780 or 31% saying they use an Intel processor; an impressive 4,316 or 14% saying they use a Socket AM4 Ryzen 5000X3D series processor (5800X3D or 5600X3D); followed by 3,034 or 10% saying they use the latest 7000X3D series "Zen 4" processors. The X3D series together make 7,350 votes, or 23%.
The 3D Vertical Cache technology involves enlarging the last-level L3 cache of the processor by stacking the serious of the processor's 7 nm "Zen 3" or 5 nm "Zen 4" CPU core die (CCD) with a 64 MB L3 cache die (L3D) built on the 6 nm process. This die operates at the same performance as the on-die 32 MB L3 cache, and hence adds to it as a 96 MB continuously addressable cache block visible to software. This large amount of fast memory sitting close to the CPU cores allows a larger amount of game data to be stored at a significantly faster storage medium than the DDR4/DDR5 main memory, resulting in tangible gaming performance improvements. Depending on the game, these range anywhere between -2% to 23%.

The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is an exceptionally popular processor, as it allows those on the older Socket AM4 platform to achieve gaming performance on-par with a newer desktop powered by a Core i9-12900K "Alder Lake" processor (around 15% to 20% higher gaming performance than a regular 5800X). AMD's first Ryzen 7000 processors roughly match the 5800X3D in gaming performance despite lacking 3D V-cache, on the backs of improved IPC of the "Zen 4" cores, and faster DDR5 memory, but were swiftly beaten by the 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake." AMD responded with the 7000X3D processors, which restore the gaming performance leadership over the 13th Gen, with the 7800X3D in particular being the fastest gaming processor that's widely available.
Source: TechPowerUp Frontpage Poll
Add your own comment

100 Comments on AMD Ryzen X3D Processors are Popular with TPU Readers, 23% Market Share: Poll Results

#51
TheDeeGee
I bet they will be even more popular once their BIOS comes out of Alpha.
Posted on Reply
#52
AusWolf
oxrufiioxoI use to be like you now I just like stock lol guess I am getting old lol.
Or maybe like me, you also realised that you can't gain +50% with the flick of a switch like you could 20-30 years ago. :ohwell:

Anything less isn't worth the hassle, imo.
Posted on Reply
#53
Arco
TheDeeGeeI bet they will be even more popular once their BIOS comes out of Alpha.
Huh???
Posted on Reply
#54
phanbuey
oxrufiioxoI use to be like you now I just like stock lol guess I am getting old lol.
less time to fafo... :D
Posted on Reply
#55
freeagent
AusWolfOr maybe like me, you also realised that you can't gain +50% with the flick of a switch like you could 20-30 years ago. :ohwell:

Anything less isn't worth the hassle, imo.
Stock is pretty weak though. 50% isn’t going to happen.. not like 20+ years ago :D

Even a 5900X running in its stock boost range with boosted power limits and some curve is stronger than stock.
Posted on Reply
#56
oxrufiioxo
freeagentStock is pretty weak though. 50% isn’t going to happen.. not like 20+ years ago :D

Even a 5900X running in its stock boost range with boosted power limits and some curve is stronger than stock.
With ryzen 5000 I get way more out of tweaking ram for games than I do trying to set a arbitrary frequency also power goes through the roof even if temps are fine so not worth the hassle.

My last platform that was worth tinkering with was a i9 9900k on Z390 but even it lost badly to a stock 5800X with a Bdie tune.
Posted on Reply
#57
Psychoholic
Recently swapped out my 7950X for a 7800X3d and loving it.
Games are silky smooth, system feels more snappy than before for some reason (maybe single CCD related there)

The only tasks i really do that are compute heavy are transcoding blue rays into mp4 files, which i use the GPU for anyway.
Posted on Reply
#58
Arco
PsychoholicRecently swapped out my 7950X for a 7800X3d and loving it.
Games are silky smooth, system feels more snappy than before for some reason (maybe single CCD related there)

The only tasks i really do that are compute heavy are transcoding blue rays into mp4 files, which i use the GPU for anyway.
I'm planning on shoving my 7950X into a cheap server rig once I upgrade.
Posted on Reply
#59
freeagent
oxrufiioxoWith ryzen 5000 I get way more out of tweaking ram for games than I do trying to set a arbitrary frequency
That’s how my clocked 5900X can hang with stock 5950X’s in Cinebench :D
Posted on Reply
#60
Jism
They are the best CPU's for the money, esp if your looking to build a cheap gaming rig. You don't need fast ram, 3200Mhz is more then enough. You don't need a big cooler, the max TDP is just 125W. You don't need a overblown big PSU - a good video card sets you at approx 350 to 450W and just call it a day.

It's also a perfect upgrade path on AM4 if your still on 2700X or below, roughly 50% faster.

The interesting thing about the X3D - they where originally designed as Epyc with large leaps of extra cache that could benefit from it. The engineering team had to figure something out to re-use the less usable parts and that is kind of how the X3D was born.

Downsides are: You can't overclock it. Overvolting to above 1.35V instant death for it's CPU cache. The cache is tied to the voltage rail of the CPU. The IPC for applications that cannot use the extra cache is a bit lower compared to a 5800X for example due to lower clocks.
Posted on Reply
#61
kapone32
To be honest the 5800X3D does feel slower than the 5900X in everything else but Gaming. I also remember people lamenting about no V cache on the high core count parts. Well now I have a 7900X3D and regardless of anything it feels faster than the 5800X3D even in Gaming. 5.7 GHz is not slow speed and 5.1 is just fine. I still don't even have super fast RAM yet.
JismThey are the best CPU's for the money, esp if your looking to build a cheap gaming rig. You don't need fast ram, 3200Mhz is more then enough. You don't need a big cooler, the max TDP is just 125W. You don't need a overblown big PSU - a good video card sets you at approx 350 to 450W and just call it a day.

It's also a perfect upgrade path on AM4 if your still on 2700X or below, roughly 50% faster.

The interesting thing about the X3D - they where originally designed as Epyc with large leaps of extra cache that could benefit from it. The engineering team had to figure something out to re-use the less usable parts and that is kind of how the X3D was born.

Downsides are: You can't overclock it. Overvolting to above 1.35V instant death for it's CPU cache. The cache is tied to the voltage rail of the CPU. The IPC for applications that cannot use the extra cache is a bit lower compared to a 5800X for example due to lower clocks.
One of the best things about X3D chips is how little power they consume to give you that performance. Once you go AM5 you don't worry about OC as the chip is engineered to do just that.
Posted on Reply
#62
unwind-protect
BoboOOZI don't see why they are "surprisingly" popular, they have many qualities: improved gaming performance, improved monothreaded performance for cache heavy applications, good efficiency and decent price, they must be a good choice for many people.
I think the x3d adaption has been hampered by the lack of AM4 multi-CCD x3d options. I would have loved to build around a 5950x3d if it existed, for my mixed gaming and development machine. But I couldn't take the downgrade to 8 cores. So the non-X3d 5950x it is.
Posted on Reply
#63
Auxityne
One small question:

...why does the headline say 25% when the poll says 7,350/31,862, which is 23.06%? I'm a little confused.
Posted on Reply
#64
Guwapo77
freeagentYou didn’t hear it from me but..

Stock isn’t so bad.. much quieter that’s for sure :D
Screenshot!
Posted on Reply
#65
freeagent
Guwapo77Screenshot!
I honestly don’t have a single one lol.. I tried it once or twice and was like yuck :laugh:

:rockout:
Posted on Reply
#66
Guwapo77
PsychoholicRecently swapped out my 7950X for a 7800X3d and loving it.
Games are silky smooth, system feels more snappy than before for some reason (maybe single CCD related there)

The only tasks i really do that are compute heavy are transcoding blue rays into mp4 files, which i use the GPU for anyway.
I really hope their next 7950X3D (8950X3D) gives the best of both worlds. Best gaming performance and best in productivity; however, I might be asking for a little too much.
Posted on Reply
#67
evernessince
With my 7800X3D I can run 3 simultaneous AV1 encodes (present 0 CF 0) while playing all my normal games and doing work. My 5800X would have been a stuttery mess but somehow the 7800X3D manages to keep it together.

Multi-threaded performance may not be the best but X3D CPUs just make for a responsive system. It's only consuming 60w the whole time as well, going to need to crank up my GPU for the winter because the CPU is not nearly enough to heat it up, even running encodes 24/7.
Posted on Reply
#68
sephiroth117
I have a 7800x3d

very powerful in games and consumes far less Watts than the high-end Intels under load

Doesn’t heat like crazy too, easy to cool

to sum up: For gaming it has everything: price, power, stability (make sure you have the latest bioses) and efficiency
Posted on Reply
#69
80-watt Hamster
JismThey are the best CPU's for the money, esp if your looking to build a cheap gaming rig. You don't need fast ram, 3200Mhz is more then enough. You don't need a big cooler, the max TDP is just 125W. You don't need a overblown big PSU - a good video card sets you at approx 350 to 450W and just call it a day.

It's also a perfect upgrade path on AM4 if your still on 2700X or below, roughly 50% faster.

The interesting thing about the X3D - they where originally designed as Epyc with large leaps of extra cache that could benefit from it. The engineering team had to figure something out to re-use the less usable parts and that is kind of how the X3D was born.

Downsides are: You can't overclock it. Overvolting to above 1.35V instant death for it's CPU cache. The cache is tied to the voltage rail of the CPU. The IPC for applications that cannot use the extra cache is a bit lower compared to a 5800X for example due to lower clocks.
You and I have very different definitions of cheap. A [5,7]800X3D costs (on Newegg US at time of post) not all that much less than I generally spend on an entire platform.
Posted on Reply
#70
AusWolf
freeagentStock is pretty weak though. 50% isn’t going to happen.. not like 20+ years ago :D

Even a 5900X running in its stock boost range with boosted power limits and some curve is stronger than stock.
I don't know. I wouldn't call my 7800X3D with a 4800 MHz all-core boost limit "weak". ;)

Just because you can do a little bit better with some tweaking, it doesn't mean that stock is garbage.
Posted on Reply
#71
tabascosauz
QuietBobNow that CS2 is out I'm expecting the 5800X3D/7800X3D to become a popular choice with competitive gamers as well:
Won't catch me being the biggest fan of CS2 (certain things in the game, even smokes, regularly still tanks any setup down to double digits), but my 5800X3D has been making a strong showing, and also making some 7000X3D owners I know feel a bit ripped off for the amount of money they dropped on their setups :D those upper midrange AM5 board prices are outright insane.
Posted on Reply
#72
Thimblewad
tabascosauzWon't catch me being the biggest fan of CS2 (certain things in the game, even smokes, regularly still tanks any setup down to double digits), but my 5800X3D has been making a strong showing, and also making some 7000X3D owners I know feel a bit ripped off for the amount of money they dropped on their setups :D those upper midrange AM5 board prices are outright insane.
Bought the 5800X3D about a week before the game came out (had the beta for a long time tho), and when the benchmarks arrived I was just blown away :D Also, have been using the AMD Prism cooler with a custom fan curve and the guy won't even go over 80°C on full load, about 10°C hotter than my old OC'd 5600X which is just amazing! :toast:
Posted on Reply
#73
tpa-pr
I built my new rig just before the 7 series X3D chips were available but I think I'll be sticking with the more traditional chip (7700X). It more than keeps up with my 1440p gaming needs as well as anything else I can throw at it.

I don't mind saying that I do occasionally cast a jealous eye at the X3D owners mind you! I was very impressed with my 18k Cinebench score until my manager cooly informed me his 7950X3D got 34k, oof.
Posted on Reply
#74
KLMR
This is an add for AMD to ensure good ads from them at TPU ;D
Posted on Reply
#75
gffermari


Ok, this is an outlier among others.
The real difference between the beloved 5800X3D and 7800X3D, is quite significant.
Not that I need to upgrade my 5800X3D but sometimes I see some benches like the below and I say....LOOK AT THAT!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 1st, 2024 15:49 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts