Thursday, August 6th 2009

SLI Hacked on Older Intel Chipsets

NVIDIA's SLI multi-GPU technology served as the biggest selling point of nForce series chipsets, as it was exclusive to it. With the advent of LGA-1366 processors and the Intel X58 chipset, NVIDIA allowed the Intel chipset to support the technology, as it soon became clear that it isn't going to be easy for NVIDIA to come up with an LGA-1366 chipset. Users of the older LGA-775 however still have the option of buying nForce 700 series based motherboards to use SLI, and hence no real attempt was made to ensure the technology is available to Intel chipsets. Until now.

A member of Expreview's Chinese enthusiast community has successfully enabled SLI on an Intel chipset based LGA-775 motherboard, the first feat of its kind since much older attempts on i975 platforms using much older GeForce hardware. Firewings_[CCG] successfully ran SLI of GeForce 8600 GT and GeForce GTX 260 cards on his Intel X38+ICH9R chipset based ASUS Maximus Formula motherboard. The feat is headed by software he modified, details of which will surface soon. The mod was validated by Expreview staff, who used the software to run GeForce GTX 260 SLI on a more recent P45+ICH10R based Maximus II Formula motherboard. "By installing the software that Firewings [CCG] provides us, we managed to enable SLI configuration in Directory Services Restore Mode. Due to some 'small problems' according to Firewings [CCG], the SLI configuration can't be realized in normal mode for now, but he says this will be fixed soon," commented Expreview. With SLI enabled, the multi-GPU setup was able offer performance scaling that proves the mod works.
Source: Expreview
Add your own comment

69 Comments on SLI Hacked on Older Intel Chipsets

#51
hrvoje
nVidia chipsets shold do SLI as they do, AMD Crosfire and Intel chipsets should do bought
Posted on Reply
#52
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
MeecrobATI/AMD would happly support CF on Nvidia chipsets, problem is that nvidia blocks it, just like they block SLI on non-nvidia/x58 chipsets, nvidia dosnt want anybody to beable to use 2 non-nvidia cards on their boards/chipsets.
No, nVidia doesn't block anything relating to crossfire, AMD blocks Crossfire from being activated on nVidia chipsets just like nVidia blocks SLi from being activated on Intel and AMD chipsets. It has become obvious that you are an AMD/ATi fanboy, which is why you want to try and make it seem like everything is nVidia's fault. Sorry, that isn't the case, ATi is just as much to blame here as nVidia. ATi claimed that Crossfire couldn't work on nVidia chipsets because it didn't support a certain feature(I think it was PCI-E writeback or soemthing like that), they made the same claim about certain Intel chipsets. Surprisingly...they managed to work the problem out on Intel chipsets...but still block Crossfire on nVidia chipsets...
MeecrobOh and about the main topic post, nVidia has an i3/i5/i7 chipset, but intel wont let them market it, its nothing to do with nVidia not being able to make one or having trouble making the chipset, Intel just dosnt want the competition in the chipset market and used bully tactics to get nvidia to give in and let them have an SLI license......
Intel isn't stopping nVidia from marketting any chipset. They will have chipsets available for 1156. Intel didn't stop them from marketting 1336 chipsets either, nVidia caused their own demise there...
MeecrobIf nVidia where smart, they would just unlock SLI on all chipsets and allow CF on their own chipsets, it would make them more money, even if the sale market for sli/cf is pretty small, it would also piss intel off.
Allowing Crossfire on nVidia chipsets is up to ATi/AMD, not nVidia, nVidia has nothing to do with the decision.
MeecrobHumm, could it be that the deal they made with intel dosnt allow them to unlock SLI on all platforms? wouldnt put it past intel to make that a stipulation.
What deal with Intel? The deal to make i7/i5/i3 chipsets? That deal just recently existed, it wouldn't explain why they haven't unlocked SLi in the past. Or the deal to make Intel chipsets in general, I doubt Intel would force nVidia to not unlock SLi on their chipsets. It just doesn't make any sense from Intel's standpoint. It would only serve to improve their chipset sales. The only reason nVidia doesn't allow SLi on Intel chipsets is because if they did, no one would buy nVidia based motherboards.
Posted on Reply
#53
goldfries
newtekie1No, nVidia doesn't block anything, AMD blocks Crossfire from being activated on nVidia chipsets just like nVidia blocks SLi from being activated on Intel and AMD chipsets.
so does nVidia block or not? :P
Posted on Reply
#54
AltecV1
goldfriesso does nVidia block or not? :P
nice :roll:
Posted on Reply
#55
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
goldfriesso does nVidia block or not? :P
nVidia doesn't block anything relating to Crossfire. I figured most intellegent people could figure out that I was commenting relating to crossfire since I was responding to a comment about crossfire...I guess I overestimated people's comprehension skills...
Posted on Reply
#56
goldfries
Dude, I'm just highlighting the inconsistency of your post within the same line. You didn't have to get all worked up for something that's rooted from your own words, do you?

Perhaps I do lack in comprehension skills or intellect, but there's no reason for treating anyone like that.

Not only am I being accused of being a troll but also accused being a duplicate of someone who just got banned? :cool: amusing........
Posted on Reply
#57
PP Mguire
DOsent matter, it can still be activated through drivers no matter what chipset.
Posted on Reply
#58
method526
i hope nvidia doesnt get on their a$$e$
Posted on Reply
#59
KainXS
on the original forum its posted this guy makes an even bigger claim

he says he is able to run the 8600 and GTX in sli somehow and it works


. . . . . I don't believe it
Posted on Reply
#60
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
KainXSon the original forum its posted this guy makes an even bigger claim

he says he is able to run the 8600 and GTX in sli somehow and it works


. . . . . I don't believe it
I think he meant he tried this on 2x 8600 GT and 2x GTX 260 so far. Not everyone has a boxful of cards. Here's the thread: bbs.expreview.com/thread-22862-1-1.html









So that's 2x GTX 260, and 2x 8600 GT. Not GTX 260 + 8600 GT.

His GTX 260 cards are the old 192-SP models btw.
Posted on Reply
#61
steelkane
Oh, so that's what a Hacker looks like
Posted on Reply
#62
Wile E
Power User
So, if he gets this running normally, anyone want to trade a 4870X2 and 4870 1GB for a couple of 285's or a couple 1792MB 275's? :D
Posted on Reply
#63
KainXS
btarunrI think he meant he tried this on 2x 8600 GT and 2x GTX 260 so far. Not everyone has a boxful of cards. Here's the thread: bbs.expreview.com/thread-22862-1-1.html

img.techpowerup.org/090806/Capture071.png

img.techpowerup.org/090806/Capture072.png

img.techpowerup.org/090806/Capture074191.jpg

img.techpowerup.org/090806/Capture075112.jpg

So that's 2x GTX 260, and 2x 8600 GT. Not GTX 260 + 8600 GT.

His GTX 260 cards are the old 192-SP models btw.
OK that had me a little confused:p
Posted on Reply
#64
PP Mguire
Wile ESo, if he gets this running normally, anyone want to trade a 4870X2 and 4870 1GB for a couple of 285's or a couple 1792MB 275's? :D
How bout a couple 280s?























































jk :p
Posted on Reply
#67
TheWolf
Read & watching closely, this was only allowed to a few for testing, mostly mods & admin at Exp.
So much time has passed I do not think the mod will ever see the light of day.
I hope that it would as I have up to 3x 260GTX & a Abit IX38 that I would like to test this on.
Looks like by the time it is leaked out "if ever" we will have drivers & hardware that will be beyond the need.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 23rd, 2024 06:21 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts