| Friday, September 18 2009 |

Here are the fist pictures of Sapphire's Radeon HD 5800 series offerings: Radeon HD 5870 1GB and Radeon HD 5850. The cards sport the usual sticker design of a CGI girl in a reddish background. With these cards having the cosmetic "red-streak" cleaving the cooler shroud in the center, the so is the sticker. This is also perhaps the first public picture of the Radeon HD 5850, and our size projections were right: While the Radeon HD 5870 maintains a long PCB, the HD 5850 is about as long as a Radeon HD 4870 (reference design). Both accelerators stick to the reference AMD design.
* Images removed at request of Sapphire * Google for alternate source
Source: Hermitage Akihabara
* Images removed at request of Sapphire * Google for alternate source
Source: Hermitage Akihabara
User comments
Look so much better than the HD48xx series :)
i really can't wait for release.
i really can't wait for release.
Yea,h it is really nice and the specs are fantastic^^
by Crazykenny (September 18th - 1:51 PM) - Reply
by: kylzerI still think my Vapor-X HD4870 from Sapphire looks sexy. :P
Look so much better than the HD48xx series :)
i really can't wait for release.
Can't wait for performance numbers!
What I find interesting is that ATi has decided to use a crippled core on the HD5850. In the past they've used the full core, but changed the memory subsystem. This time they've crippled the core, and left the memory relatively unchanged.
I wonder if that has anything to do with the problems with 40nm?
What I find interesting is that ATi has decided to use a crippled core on the HD5850. In the past they've used the full core, but changed the memory subsystem. This time they've crippled the core, and left the memory relatively unchanged.
I wonder if that has anything to do with the problems with 40nm?
Vapor-X cards will always look dead sexy, they are the Fat Bastards of Austin Powers...
It's nice to see that they have the same cooler because i find it sexy :laugh:.
by pantherx12 (September 18th - 1:57 PM) - Reply
Don't like the look of the 870.
The 850 looks much nicer, better CGI lass and more black, win!
The 850 looks much nicer, better CGI lass and more black, win!
by Fitseries3 (September 18th - 2:01 PM) - Reply
ewwww
take the sticker off.
it looks so much better plain
take the sticker off.
it looks so much better plain
Cool go faster line + a go faster sticker. As long as the card does well i'm happy :).
lol the 5850 sticker looks better than the 5870 sticker, what the hell sapphire
by pantherx12 (September 18th - 2:08 PM) - Reply
I prefer the simple design as well, although a bit of colour might be okay, some sort of simple fractal.
by: newtekie1i think it becaouse there are no GDDR6 to begin with, and if ati use GDDR3/4 with HD 5850 it will definitely useless because it will become bandwidth limited (just like those 9600 GS with 96sp)
Can't wait for performance numbers!
What I find interesting is that ATi has decided to use a crippled core on the HD5850. In the past they've used the full core, but changed the memory subsystem. This time they've crippled the core, and left the memory relatively unchanged.
I wonder if that has anything to do with the problems with 40nm?
i can't wait for wizz benches,:respect:
by LaidLawJones (September 18th - 2:12 PM) - Reply
So this card must run pretty cool at max load as I do not see any cooling vents from this angle. If the other side is the same, then the majority of air intake is through the fan. Is this finally a stock cooling solution that works well and is quiet but not exotic?
To bad the bar down the center doesn't light up.
To bad the bar down the center doesn't light up.
by: newtekie1
I wonder if that has anything to do with the problems with 40nm?
GTX 260 comes with a crippled core too. That doesn't indicate foundry problems, does it? It's merely how the SKUs are carved out.
They wanted to make a full transition to GDDR5, and maybe didn't want to use GDDR3. Over 100 GB/s memory bandwidth using 256-bit GDDR3 is not possible / requires expensive chips (one of these), and under 100 GB/s of bandwidth will probably bottleneck Cypress.
by TheMailMan78 (September 18th - 2:19 PM) - Reply
by: Fitseries3
ewwww
take the sticker off.
it looks so much better plain
I agree. WTF happen the the other ones with Mussels mouth I mean "decorative air holes in the back" and the sloped cooler? These suck.
Oh and Bta GO TO BED MAN!
by: TheMailMan78Wrong mod. It's time for Mussels to hit the bed, not me.
Oh and Bta GO TO BED MAN!
woah... power:eek:
by TheMailMan78 (September 18th - 2:46 PM) - Reply
by: btarunrYeah I forget. I keep thinking India is the polar opposite in time. Nevermind. Continue on your regularly scheduled thread.
Wrong mod. It's time for Mussels to hit the bed, not me.
by human_error (September 18th - 2:47 PM) - Reply
Hmm, interesting.
Glad to see the 5850 with a dual slot cooler this round - i always felt the cooler on the 4850 could have been a better design.
I also noticed how the 5850 is shorter than the 5870 there - by a reasonable amount as well. After seeing leaked images of the 5870 pcb it leaves me wandering what they removed from the pcb that is needed for the 5870 but not the 5850. I guess i'll have to wait until next week to find out :)
Glad to see the 5850 with a dual slot cooler this round - i always felt the cooler on the 4850 could have been a better design.
I also noticed how the 5850 is shorter than the 5870 there - by a reasonable amount as well. After seeing leaked images of the 5870 pcb it leaves me wandering what they removed from the pcb that is needed for the 5870 but not the 5850. I guess i'll have to wait until next week to find out :)
by TheMailMan78 (September 18th - 2:49 PM) - Reply
by: human_error
Hmm, interesting.
Glad to see the 5850 with a dual slot cooler this round - i always felt the cooler on the 4850 could have been a better design.
I also noticed how the 5850 is shorter than the 5870 there - by a reasonable amount as well. After seeing leaked images of the 5870 pcb it leaves me wandering what they removed from the pcb that is needed for the 5870 but not the 5850. I guess i'll have to wait until next week to find out :)
It has to do with power consumption. Our GPU keeps getting smaller but the capacitors and resistors stay the same. :laugh:
The 5850 takes one less PCI-E connector than the 5870.
i don't want to see how they look !
i want to see real benches!
i want to see real benches!
by TheMailMan78 (September 18th - 2:55 PM) - Reply
by: laszlo
i don't want to see how they look !
i want to see real benches!
Official 58XX series benches.
[TABLE]Crysis: Faster than the 4870
Call of Duty 4: Faster than the 4870
FarCry2: Faster than the 4870
3DMark06: Faster than the 4870
Vantage: Faster than the 4870[/TABLE]
Feel better? Now lets talk about the thread subject.
Hope cooler designs stay the same :)
a 4870 waterblock( full coverage block) fits on 5870 :P
a 4870 waterblock( full coverage block) fits on 5870 :P
by: wahdangunNot useless, just crippled. That same way crippling the core would hinder it. I don't believe dropping to GDDR3 would have hurt it any more than disabling shaders.
i think it becaouse there are no GDDR6 to begin with, and if ati use GDDR3/4 with HD 5850 it will definitely useless because it will become bandwidth limited (just like those 9600 GS with 96sp)
i can't wait for wizz benches,:respect:
by: btarunrIt does indicate defective GPUs, nVidia has used the crippling method to get rid of defective cores for as far back as I can remember. ATi used to do it also, but stopped recently, at least when the GPUs first game out. They would add the crippled GPUs in later.
GTX 260 comes with a crippled core too. That doesn't indicate foundry problems, does it? It's merely how the SKUs are carved out.
They wanted to make a full transition to GDDR5, and maybe didn't want to use GDDR3. Over 100 GB/s memory bandwidth using 256-bit GDDR3 is not possible / requires expensive chips (one of these), and under 100 GB/s of bandwidth will probably bottleneck Cypress.
I'm not saying it is a bad thing to do this, don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with it. It is a common practice in the industry, and if it leads to cheaper parts that perform well, I'm all for it! And it has given use some of the best performance for the money cards, the 8800GT/9800GT, 8800GS/9600GSO, HD4830, 8800GTS 320MB, X1900GT, GTX260, X800GTO, 7800GT...
I'm just trying to figure out why ATi is changing their strategy all of a sudden. I wouldn't be surprised if they are still having issues with 40nm, and that is part of the decision.
by TheMailMan78 (September 18th - 3:06 PM) - Reply
by: newtekie1They heard about you newtekie1. ATI's engineers new mission in life is now to confuse you. Billions will be spent on this endeavor and they will not stop until you become so confused that björk will finally make sense and you support AMD.
I'm just trying to figure out why ATi is changing their strategy all of a sudden.
