Tuesday, October 27th 2009
First spotted soon after AMD's release of its flagship ATI Radeon HD 5870 accelerator, Sapphire's HD 5870 Vapor-X has finally taken shape. From the looks of it, the final iteration seems to be slightly different from the CGI drawing that made for the older report. Sapphire's design methodology seems to be revolving around giving AMD's reference PCB better cooling than AMD's own cooler. Perhaps owing to lavish use of high-grade digital-PWM circuitry, there is very little room for improvement, leaving room only for cost-cutting, which surprisingly, doesn't form part of Sapphire's new card.

Unlike an older prototype in which the cooler shroud doesn't seem to be fully covering the PCB, the redesigned shroud fits the PCB like a glove, enhancing its aesthetics. The Vapor-X cooler uses a vapor-chamber design, that accumulates and distributes heat to the cooler better. Aluminum fin blocks on either sides of the GPU block disperse heat under the fan's air-flow. The AMD Cypress GPU that powers it is DirectX 11 compliant, which features 1600 stream processors, and a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface to connect to the 1 GB of memory onboard. Sapphire uses overclocked parameters, 870 MHz core (vs. 850 MHz reference), and 1250 MHz / effective 5.00 GHz memory (vs. 1200 MHz / 4.8 GHz reference). Sapphire's HD 5870 Vapor-X should be out in time for X-Mas.



Source: Legit Reviews
posted by btarunr - 8:07 PM |  Related News

User comments
1 to 26 of 39 | Go to Page 1 2    Previous | Next
by Xyvik (8:24 PM) - Reply
Certainly looks a lot better than the reference boards. I wonder when we'll be able to get our hands on these? Anybody know/guess?
by Solaris17 (8:41 PM) - Reply
this is HOT i want this only in the 2x X2 flavor.
by skylamer (8:43 PM) - Reply
n1ce video card :))))
by WarEagleAU (9:03 PM) - Reply
I so want this. Maybe after the first of the year when prices come down.
by Easo (9:09 PM) - Reply
Even reference looks kewl, but this just plain rocks!
by pantherx12 (9:12 PM) - Reply
Nice! Like that the back end is open as well, it means front intake fans can help force air out the vent!
by DonInKansas (9:12 PM) - Reply
I hear Jim Carrey in my head saying "liiiiiiiike a glooove!!"
by MKmods (9:20 PM) - Reply
these looks like the silly toxic coolers with Vapor X written on them. The 4870s Vapor X coolers were MUCH better than the toxic ones, its gonna be interesting to see if they improved these coolers or if they use the same smashed closed heatpipes as the earlier ones. If anyone finds a pict of the insides it would be really nice to see.
by Hayder_Master (9:58 PM) - Reply
now we talk better cooler
by LittleLizard (10:22 PM) - Reply
me wants that and a psu to handle it
by erocker (10:25 PM) - Reply
by: MKmods
these looks like the silly toxic coolers with Vapor X written on them. The 4870s Vapor X coolers were MUCH better than the toxic ones, its gonna be interesting to see if they improved these coolers or if they use the same smashed closed heatpipes as the earlier ones. If anyone finds a pict of the insides it would be really nice to see.
I quite like the toxic cooler, it has to be the best GPU cooler I've used! Looking closer at the 1st picture I do see heatpipes running off the center.
by MKmods (10:50 PM) - Reply
by: erocker
I quite like the toxic cooler, it has to be the best GPU cooler I've used! Looking closer at the 1st picture I do see heatpipes running off the center.
I compared both the Toxic and Vapor X coolers on the same cards and the Vapor X was at least 5C cooler each time. I had 2 of each to play with (thanks to Tzi) Here is a shot of the toxic tubes smashed closed Here is a back side shot of the 2 dif coolers Here is the dif in fans The smaller fan on the Vapor X (with more blades) was much quieter as well I would really like to see the insides of the new cooler and see if they changed anything
by phanbuey (10:51 PM) - Reply
woah... now THAT is a smexy card - much better than stock lol.
by Soylent Joe (11:04 PM) - Reply
I thought that the Vapor-X cards were really problematic...
by erocker (11:09 PM) - Reply
by: Soylent Joe
I thought that the Vapor-X cards were really problematic...
How so? What problems are happening?
by pantherx12 (11:13 PM) - Reply
by: erocker
How so? What problems are happening?
I heard they were iffy too, was when I first joint up, a lot of people telling people not to buy them etc, never saw any sources though :laugh:
by Animalpak (11:15 PM) - Reply
Very bad ass looking card.
by FreedomEclipse (11:35 PM) - Reply
Very nice It looks like you could swap out that 92mm fan there & replace it with one of your own. Ive still got an old 92mm LED fan that i took off a old Zalman flower cooler a while back. that would look totally bling with that on. Im not an overall huge fan of vapour X coolers myself - or at least not the toxic ones anyway my 4870 toxic use to idle around 60-65'c untill I put some MX-2 on it & tweaked the fan profiles in the bios. now its more like 50-55'c idle. I still keep the temps from hitting 70'c if i can.
by Divide Overflow (11:37 PM) - Reply
by: Soylent Joe
I thought that the Vapor-X cards were really problematic...
I've been using my HD 4870 Vapor-X 24x7 for months crunching distributed computing applications when I'm not gaming. I haven't had a single problem so far and am still going strong. I'd almost like it to start acting up. It would give me an excuse to upgrade to this sweet piece of silicon.
by InnocentCriminal (11:53 PM) - Reply
I'm interested to see what other manufacturers have to offer, ASUS will be releasing their non-reference (cooled) 5870 soon or so I've heard. I'm a bit gutted Gainward aren't doing any more ATi cards as well. :(
by Soylent Joe (11:55 PM) - Reply
by: erocker
How so? What problems are happening?
Many of the 1 egg reviews are describing a boot problem. But I know, that's just a single card and any model of video card will have some lemons. Also, knowing that there is an active water cycle going on within the cooler would make me kind of hesitant about it's reliability, that is, there is a water cycle (evaporation, condensation, precipitation) going on. I'm not completely sure as to how the coolers work.
by Cheeseball (12:28 AM) - Reply
The reason why there are people that don't like the Vapor-X versions of the HD 4870 and HD 4890 is because their PCB design lacks the Volterra voltage control chip. :P For overclockers, that's a kick in the balls. One of Sapphire's dumbest mistakes. EDIT: I double-checked the review of the HD 4890 that W1zzard did, but his had a reference PCB. Weird.
by Aceman.au (1:18 AM) - Reply
If I cant get a x2 then this is what Im getting... F***ing awesome card...
by Conflict0s (2:48 AM) - Reply
One of the nicest cards I have seen, I think I will get this instead of the XFX now.
by wolf (2:53 AM) - Reply
I'd have liked to see a non reference PCB, even though there isn't much to fault on ATi's the thing that annoys me is the coil buzz, my experience of non-reference = no buzz/screech.
1 to 26 of 39 | Go to Page 1 2    Previous | Next
4445 Users online, 2.45 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
TechPowerUp on Facebook 
TechPowerUp on Google+ 
TechPowerUp Mobile App
New Forum Posts
00:39 by Maban
Question about fan speed (2)
00:38 by brandonwh64
Gigabyte P55-ud3r (10)
00:38 by eidairaman1
CPU running hot and a fan is louder (4)
00:36 by SpitFire927
Giveaway: Diablo 3 GUEST PASS (41)
00:34 by eidairaman1
Memory popularity thread! (19)
00:31 by zodac
CC 2012 Stats page & Chat page (10)
00:25 by Phusius
Accidental build on the AsRock Z68 (76)
Popular Reviews

Latest VGA Drivers

ATI Catalyst 12.4 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64

NVIDIA GeForce 296.10 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64