Thursday, March 18th 2010

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Reference Design Card Final Design Pictured

Many would be familiar with these pictures of a generic graphics card based on NVIDIA's GF100 GPU which was spotted at this year's CES. A company slide sourced by DonanimHaber reveals the final iteration of NVIDIA's reference design GeForce GTX 480 graphics accelerator, and what it looks like from the outside. A set of slightly more recent pictures showed its cooling assembly from inside. The protruding heat pipes intrigued us as they were inconsistent with the cooling assembly on the card NVIDIA showed off at CES, which we then believed to be the top-end GTX 480 part. The company slide confirms what the cooling assembly looks like when it's all put together.

The cooler is highly ventilated, with vents all over the cooler's shroud. There are vents on the top, on the sides, apart from the usual obverse fan air intake. To increase its intake, the PCB is further cut to help draw air from the reverse-side of the PCB. The cooler's four large (we reckon 8 mm thick) heat pipes protrude about a centimeter out of the card's periphery, increasing its height by that much. The cooler itself respects the 2-slot thickness limit which is most conventional. A table in the slide also confirms some details we already know: the card has 1536 MB of GDDR5 memory across a 384-bit wide interface. It has a TDP of under 300W, which a recent report reveals to be a hairbreadth under 300W, at 296W. Power is drawn in from an 8-pin and a 6-pin PCI-E power connector. The card is 10.5 inches long, the same length as its reference-design GeForce GTX 280. The card supports 3-way SLI. It will be unveiled on the 26th of March.
Source: DonanimHaber
Add your own comment

137 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Reference Design Card Final Design Pictured

#26
KainXS
if that heatsink can handle a 296, that must be one helluva heatsink, . . . . and a 1.8A fan to boot, god damn

and I can't see overclocking 1 470 to match 1 GTX480
Posted on Reply
#27
human_error
dear lord that's one hot card, nvidia have really got some problems if their single gpu card outputs as much as ati's dual gpu card. Of course this wouldn't matter if it performed the same, but from leaked benchies it looks to be in 5870 territory, not the 5970...
Posted on Reply
#28
KainXS
Edit:

I'm just sad because I can think of nothing to justify the power consumption to me.

I thought nvidia had 40nm down but it seems that they didn't learn enough with the GT21X cards to me.
Posted on Reply
#29
pr0n Inspector
One heatpipe goes sideway inside the heatsink. If you have seen an GTX260/280 cooler you will know this.
Posted on Reply
#31
Selene
Its said <300watt wich means under 300watts.
But yea its going to use some power, we new that, stop acting like its some thing big.
If your runing SLI on a GT200 or better card you can bet you need a good PSU, the days of 400-500watt PSU are over, if you want the best you have to feed it.
Posted on Reply
#32
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
300w doesn't seem that bad for power consumption, the HD5780 was at 212w. So 88w more for the GTX480 really isn't that terrible...

I'm interested in what the GTX470's power consumption is, as I have a feeling it will be closer to the HD5870 numbers in both power consumption and performance(and hopefully price).
Posted on Reply
#33
AlienIsGOD
Vanguard Beta Tester
3 way sli !?!?! ya if u want to burn ur house down or cook a meal with ur computer :)
Posted on Reply
#34
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
newtekie1I'm interested in what the GTX470's power consumption is, as I have a feeling it will be closer to the HD4870 numbers in both power consumption and performance(and hopefully price).
GTX 470's is around 225W.
Posted on Reply
#35
simlariver
157% power consumption of the HD5870 and Nvidia is positioning their card to have a "slight edge" in "most benchmarks and games".

fail fail fail.

With such a high Power consumption, OC will be limited and the board will be way too hot anyway. This is just a generation to skip. I bet ATI will murder the GTX 4xx series at launch with price-drops and neat-future products announcements. It's about time for HD6000 or HD5890, is it ? lol
Posted on Reply
#37
jessicafae
I know this is a major wish, but I really hope the 5850 drops to $200 and the 5870 to $300. That or ATI announces something interesting ... like say .... a process shrink to GlobalFoundaries 32nm SOI along with less heat, higher clocks and cheaper manufacturing costs. maybe....
Posted on Reply
#38
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
jessicafaeI know this is a major wish, but I really hope the 5850 drops to $200 and the 5870 to $300. That or ATI announces something interesting ... like say .... a process shrink to GlobalFoundaries 32nm SOI along with less heat, higher clocks and cheaper manufacturing costs. maybe....
it depends on nvidias prices. If Nv have high prices, ATI will just launch a refresh at slightly higher prices than they have now.

If Nv has lower prices, ATI will do a sudden price drop to beat them in sales, and when sales die off they'll release the new refresh at roughly the prices the previous cards were at prior to the drop (like they did with 4870 - dropped from $300 au to $200 au, then the 4890 came out around $300 au)
Posted on Reply
#39
xrealm20
so, they are at the pci-e spec limit of 300w -- right?
Posted on Reply
#40
Yellow&Nerdy?
SeleneIts said <300watt wich means under 300watts.
If the TDP would actually be reasonable, lets say 248W, they would of written <250W. It's an ancient sales trick. Like when you go buy stuff, the price never ends in full tens or hundreds, but e.g. 99$, cause then they can say: "Get this and that for under 100 bucks!"

I think the estimate of 296W in the article is probably quite accurate. Anyways, it will be between 290-300.
Posted on Reply
#41
Yellow&Nerdy?
newtekie1300w doesn't seem that bad for power consumption, the HD5780 was at 212w. So 88w more for the GTX480 really isn't that terrible...
Actually, it's very terrible. And btw, the 5870 has a TDP of 188W, not 212. That would be 108W bigger TDP. But what's more worrying is, that Nvidias single-GPU card produces as much heat as ATIs dual-GPU card. The dual Fermi better have one magical cooler or otherwise it will melt...
Posted on Reply
#42
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Yellow&amp;Nerdy?If the TDP would actually be reasonable, lets say 248W, they would of written <250W. It's an ancient sales trick. Like when you go buy stuff, the price never ends in full tens or hundreds, but e.g. 99$, cause then they can say: "Get this and that for under 100 bucks!"

I think the estimate of 296W in the article is probably quite accurate. Anyways, it will be between 290-300.
If the board power was 289W, NVIDIA would have written it as "<290W".
Posted on Reply
#43
Lionheart
Im so sick of talkin about fermi, I just wanna see benchies, I dont know why but i have a feeling these cards will perform good, and really good in tessellated DX11 games.:slap:
Posted on Reply
#44
jessicafae
Musselsit depends on nvidias prices. If Nv have high prices, ATI will just launch a refresh at slightly higher prices than they have now.

If Nv has lower prices, ATI will do a sudden price drop to beat them in sales, and when sales die off they'll release the new refresh at roughly the prices the previous cards were at prior to the drop (like they did with 4870 - dropped from $300 au to $200 au, then the 4890 came out around $300 au)
you are right, but I was wishing. Most likely NV prices will be high, ATI will most likely not lower prices on the current 40nm 5xxx series at all since it costs so much to make the chips on TSMC's 40nm process. I am still hoping for a summer process shrink to GF 32nm for the evergreen family along with lower initial pricing for the refreshed products since they will be SO much cheaper to make (great yields and more chips per wafer).
Posted on Reply
#45
[I.R.A]_FBi
CHAOS_KILLAIm so sick of talkin about fermi, I just wanna see benchies, I dont know why but i have a feeling these cards will perform good, and really good in tessellated DX11 games.:slap:
fermi: the fairy everyone talks about but noone has seen
Posted on Reply
#46
Zubasa
[I.R.A]_FBifermi: the fairy everyone talks about but noone has seen
Fermi: The Invisible Pink Unicorn GPU
Posted on Reply
#47
Animalpak
Looks like a real beast, reminds some HIS coolers cards.

So the next step... What about the dual GPU of them ?

Will be two GTX 470 or 480 in single PCB ?
Posted on Reply
#48
cadaveca
My name is Dave
btarunrIf the board power was 289W, NVIDIA would have written it as "<290W".
Power is precisely where expected. I dunno why everyone is so shocked...150% of 5870 transisitors(3 bil vs Cypress' 2.1bil), on the same process, generally means 150% the power consumption...

Now, if performance of 480 is only 15% more than 5870, with 150% transistors, and 150% power consumption, there's a HUGE issue here. If it gets 150% of 5870, or even 140%, pricing wars will ensue. Everyone better cross thier finger that it's the latter, and not the former.
Posted on Reply
#49
Zubasa
AnimalpakLooks like a real beast, reminds some HIS coolers cards.

So the next step... What about the dual GPU of them ?

Will be two GTX 470 or 480 in single PCB ?
That will be a GTX 460 Dual at best :shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#50
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
no no, there will be a dual GPU fermi - it just takes two PCI-E slots. Due to the spacing being so limited it will only work on Nvidia chipset boards, of course - and since Nvidia dont make any chipsets these days, you just have to buy a mac while you wait.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 19th, 2024 06:32 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts