Friday, March 19 2010
A set of company slides leaked to the press reveals that NVIDIA is claiming the upper hand in tessellation performance. With this achievement, NVIDIA is looking to encourage leaps in geometric detail, probably in future games that make use of tessellation. NVIDIA's confidence comes from the way its GF100 GPU is designed (further explained here). Each GF100 GPU physically has 16 Polymorph Engines, one per streaming multiprocessor (SM) which helps in distributed, parallel geometry processing. Each Polymorph Engine has its own tessellation unit. With 15 SMs enabled on the GeForce GTX 480 and 14 on the GeForce GTX 470, there are that many independent tessellation units.

NVIDIA demonstrated its claims in the presentation using the Unigine Heaven, where the GeForce GTX 480 was pitted against a Radeon HD 5870. In many scenes where tessellation is lower, the GPUs performed neck-and-neck, with the GTX 480 performing better more often. But in scenes with heavy tessellation (particularly the "dragon" scene, where a highly detailed model of a dragon needs to be rendered with densely tessellated meshes, the GTX 480 clocks nearly a 100% performance increment over the HD 5870. NVIDIA has been confident about the tessellation performance back since January, when it detailed the GF100 architecture. The GeForce GTX 400 series graphics cards will be unveiled on the 26th of March.



Images Courtesy: Techno-Labs
posted by btarunr - 7:43 PM |  Related News

User comments
1 to 26 of 145 | Go to Page 1 2 3 4 5 6    Previous | Next
by KainXS (March 19th - 7:44 PM) - Reply
so they did drop a sm in the GTX480, meaning it only has 60 tmu's not 64
by btarunr (March 19th - 7:45 PM) - Reply
by: KainXS
so they did drop a sm in the GTX480, meaning it only has 60 tmu's not 64
Yup, 60 TMUs it is.
by [I.R.A]_FBi (March 19th - 7:47 PM) - Reply
i'll wait a week :)
by human_error (March 19th - 7:48 PM) - Reply
hmm yeah i'll wait for some unbiased benchies running on the same (read: not nvidia specific) version of the euginie heaven benchmark. Still if this helps drive tesselation support up in games and gets both teams working on better tesselation then i'm all for it.
by Steevo (March 19th - 7:51 PM) - Reply
Even at stock I never went below 20FPS during the Dragon scene, At my current overclock i stay about 25FPS at the dragon scene, and that is before the new drivers (10.3a). Plus the benchmark Nvidia was using was version 1.1 according to many, that included up to a 30% performance increase during heavy tessellation by aggressive culling.


So their effective 100% boost can be cut down 30% by the use of the new Heaven benchmark, plus the new drivers ATI is releasing 10-20%, and the ability to overclock most 5870 by at least 20%.


So this is Nvidias fancy way of saying by using selective math we can bend numbers our way, all day. Just like I could say.

Available DX11 Video card manufacturers.

ATI



So ATI has the fastest DX11 video card on the market in any and all configurations.
by phanbuey (March 19th - 8:07 PM) - Reply
Whoop de doo.
by Kitkat (March 19th - 8:14 PM) - Reply
this news is 3 weeks old. they had this video on youtube for the longest time.
by erocker (March 19th - 8:16 PM) - Reply
I'm curious as to how much of a boost the 10.3a drivers from ATi gave the 5870 in relation to that graph. Anyone with a i7 at 3.3ghz and a 5870 know?
by crow1001 (March 19th - 8:28 PM) - Reply
Is it really necessary to grab all the unsubstantiated fermi trash of the web, at least have a reliable source that can be backed up. The bloke next door could have compiled them graphs for all we know.

by: erocker
I'm curious as to how much of a boost the 10.3a drivers from ATi gave the 5870 in relation to that graph. Anyone with a i7 at 3.3ghz and a 5870 know?


NV were using an released version of heaven in their tests, with up to 30% tessellation optimization, so comparsions are not valid.

performance in heaven with my 5870 and 10.3's is now a lot smoother, never dips below 30 FPS.
by xaira (March 19th - 8:40 PM) - Reply
waw a 300 uhm, sorry 298watt gpu barely getting the upper hand on a 188watt gpu, thats really something to be proud of.
by Sasqui (March 19th - 8:50 PM) - Reply
Why compare one selective synthetic benchmark against a 5870, then turn around and provide a whole performance chart relative to a GTX 285?

Confused marketing.
by MarcusTaz (March 19th - 8:51 PM) - Reply
Did not Nvidia just release a driver that caused video cards to overheat and fry? ;)

I will stick with ATI as far as the eye can see. Nvidia will not get my business, not after their 7900GTX debacle vista driver and memory 2D sync issues and never fessing up to it. They took my money then and will not take it again. Plus everyone knows they cheat with benchmarks. :D

I am very happy with my HD5850 thank you that is green and runs cool...:)
by truehighroller1 (March 19th - 8:54 PM) - Reply
I have the following setup and can run this if you guys like.

GA-EP45-UD3P Rev 1.6
Q9550 E0 @ 4.2~Ghz 1.37v~ 1.34v Under Load
Swiftech Water Cooling
2x2Gb OCZ DDR2 1150Mhz @ 1188MHz 5,5,5,18 @ 2.0v
XTX 5870 @ 1GHz / 1200
3x Western Digital RE3 320Gb 16Mb Cache SataII Drives in Raid0
Corsair HX 850w Power Supply
Antec 1200 Case
3dmark Vantage Score = 19049
3DMark06 Score = 23393
by mechtech (March 19th - 8:54 PM) - Reply
meh the only thing I have time for nowadays is an ocassional game of CS Source, and my 4850 pushes that beyond my monitor refresh rate anyway.

Why dont video card reviews use HL2 source engine for a gaming benmark, to give relevence for us running all the old classics??
by evillman (March 19th - 8:56 PM) - Reply
by: Steevo
Even at stock I never went below 20FPS during the Dragon scene, At my current overclock i stay about 25FPS at the dragon scene, and that is before the new drivers (10.3a). Plus the benchmark Nvidia was using was version 1.1 according to many, that included up to a 30% performance increase during heavy tessellation by aggressive culling.


So their effective 100% boost can be cut down 30% by the use of the new Heaven benchmark, plus the new drivers ATI is releasing 10-20%, and the ability to overclock most 5870 by at least 20%.


So this is Nvidias fancy way of saying by using selective math we can bend numbers our way, all day. Just like I could say.

Available DX11 Video card manufacturers.

ATI



So ATI has the fastest DX11 video card on the market in any and all configurations.
It's true, ATI have the most powerful card until now, but in a week the fastest graphic chip will be released.
by mechtech (March 19th - 8:57 PM) - Reply
by: evillman
It's true, ATI have the most powerful card until now, but in a week the fastest graphic ship will be released.
yep thats the way it goes, back and forth, nice to have competition to stimulate technology and keep prices in check.

And in another 6-8 months or so, it may be back to ATI again, if the 6000 series is out by then, time will tell.
by crow1001 (March 19th - 9:01 PM) - Reply
In a week the fastest GFX card on the planet will still be the 5970..:rockout:
by phanbuey (March 19th - 9:15 PM) - Reply
by: truehighroller1
I have the following setup and can run this if you guys like.

GA-EP45-UD3P Rev 1.6
Q9550 E0 @ 4.2~Ghz 1.37v~ 1.34v Under Load
Swiftech Water Cooling
2x2Gb OCZ DDR2 1150Mhz @ 1188MHz 5,5,5,18 @ 2.0v
XTX 5870 @ 1GHz / 1200
3x Western Digital RE3 320Gb 16Mb Cache SataII Drives in Raid0
Corsair HX 850w Power Supply
Antec 1200 Case
3dmark Vantage Score = 19049
3DMark06 Score = 23393
Yes!!! I really would like to see that... also what is your GPU score for High in Vantage?
by DaedalusHelios (March 19th - 9:20 PM) - Reply
by: Sasqui
Why compare one selective synthetic benchmark against a 5870, then turn around and provide a whole performance chart relative to a GTX 285?

Confused marketing.
It was to show progression of the architecture rather than a comparison to the competition like the previous slides were comparing. It didn't confuse me. :laugh:
by truehighroller1 (March 19th - 9:56 PM) - Reply
by: phanbuey
Yes!!! I really would like to see that... also what is your GPU score for High in Vantage?
Edit: 19704 Compare Link: http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=1836125&compareResultType=19 . I'll see what I can do right now with the test, I have it on here already so.. bb


Edit some more: What settings did they use? I'll run with default for now and check back here shortly.
by Phxprovost (March 19th - 10:06 PM) - Reply
im sorry but dosnt your product have to be on the market in order to have an upper hand in anything? :wtf:
by DeathByTray (March 19th - 10:09 PM) - Reply
Is that a new bench or just rehash of yesteryear? ;p
by v12dock (March 19th - 10:31 PM) - Reply
Old
by rizla1 (March 19th - 10:34 PM) - Reply
wait for the gtx 460 . that will be a gud card. for middleclass
by nt300 (March 19th - 11:00 PM) - Reply
Funny how those are Nvidia clips showing benchmarks. No worry ATI does same ;)
We wait and see real world benchmarks.
1 to 26 of 145 | Go to Page 1 2 3 4 5 6    Previous | Next
4322 Users online, 2.94 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
TechPowerUp on Facebook 
TechPowerUp on Google+ 
New Forum Posts
01:41 by [H]@RD5TUFF
[FS/FT][US] [H]@RD5TUFF's stuff (856)
01:40 by mjkmike
WCG Daily Numbers (5435)
01:37 by theoneandonlym...
Ghz ? (10)
01:37 by Red_Machine
Project Old School (78)
01:34 by Velvet Wafer
Post your first FAIL (69)
01:34 by ThE_MaD_ShOt
Older high end GPU thread *Pics* (134)
01:31 by Killer_Rubber_...
[FS][US] Zotac Zbox with 320 Gb HDD and 4 Gb RAM (27)
Popular Reviews

Latest VGA Drivers

ATI Catalyst 12.1 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64

NVIDIA GeForce 285.58 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64