Monday, February 6th 2012
Gigabyte introduced a new value socket AM3+ motherboard designed for AMD FX processors, the 970A-DS3. Based on the AMD 970 + SB950 chipset, this board is a product of some clever cost-balancing by its designers, which will spice-up both its specs-sheet, and price-tag, compared to the 970A-UD3. To begin with, the 970A-DS3 uses a much lighter component loadout compared to the UD3. The 970A-UD3's Ultra Durable 3 Classic component loadout makes way for Ultra Durable 4 Classic on the 970A-DS3, which includes a better weaved fiberglass PCB that's better resistant to humidity; features high ESD-resistance ICs located in key circuits; anti-surge ICs that prevent installed processors and memory from getting fried if something goes terribly wrong with the VRM; and of course low-RDS (on) MOSFETs and 100% solid-state capacitor design.

The CPU is powered by a simple 5-phase VRM. It is wired to four DDR3 DIMM slots supporting up to 32 GB of dual-channel DDR3-1866+ MHz memory. Expansion slots include one PCI-Express 2.0 x16 (wired to the 970), one PCIe 2.0 x16 (electrical 2.0 x4, wired to the SB950), three PCIe x1, and two legacy PCI. Gigabyte didn't cheap-out on the southbridge (by opting for SB710), and so we have a full-fledged SB950, complete with six SATA 6 Gb/s ports supporting RAID5. There are two USB 3.0 ports on the rear-panel, driven by an Etron EJ168 controller. The audio is driven by Realtek ALC887, wired to just a 5.1-channel analog output cluster, apart from the front-panel header. Gigabit Ethernet driven by Realtek 8111E tops it up. Gigabyte included its DualBIOS (AwardBIOS) with the board. Expect this one to be priced around US $100 (or below), making it a nice buy for single-GPU budget gaming-PC builds.

posted by btarunr - 4:12 PM |  Related News

User comments
by m1dg3t (4:16 PM) - Reply
Nice layout! Angled SATA port's would be nice
by reverze (4:19 PM) - Reply
so its marked as DS but has the ultra durable layers like the UD marked mobos got?
by btarunr (4:22 PM) - Reply
by: reverze
so its marked as DS but has the ultra durable layers like the UD marked mobos got?
UD4 Classic is different from UD3 Classic, in that it lacks a double-thick copper layer (normal thickness), but has a more rigid fiberglass weave. Then there are active anti-surge and anti-ESD components.
by Batou1986 (5:19 PM) - Reply
I got me a 970a-ud3 great board bios can be a little tweaky tho. The ud3 is ~100$ i guess this will just fill its spot. Just noticed no vrm heatsink and a 4pin cpu :confused: well there go's any oc potential glad i got my ud3
by nonkX3 (7:48 PM) - Reply
:ohwell: no VRM heatsink??? Again?? i can smell something's burning...
by m1dg3t (7:53 PM) - Reply
Didn't realize VRM cooling was so important on newer board's, this is a budget board so they gotta save somewhere right? You can spend ~ $30 and sink the whole MOBO with Enzotech/Swiftech sink's if you wanted to push for heavy OC's
by nonkX3 (3:05 AM) - Reply
On a budget board i think they better off ditching the second pcie slot...IMHO
by btarunr (3:46 AM) - Reply
by: nonkX3
:ohwell: no VRM heatsink??? Again?? i can smell something's burning...
My $210 X58 motherboard lacks VRM heatsink, and runs fine.
by nonkX3 (3:59 AM) - Reply
by: btarunr
My $210 X58 motherboard lacks VRM heatsink, and runs fine.
Just some of my bad experience bta...i just think thats a pretty risky for me...cuz some people still don't mind about temperatures at all, i'm just imagining...that board, and an Oc-ed 81xx series. God knows what would happenned
by btarunr (4:41 AM) - Reply
by: nonkX3
Just some of my bad experience bta...i just think thats a pretty risky for me...cuz some people still don't mind about temperatures at all, i'm just imagining...that board, and an Oc-ed 81xx series. God knows what would happenned
I think it should be fine. Chokes don't produce as much heat, and there are two-each of up-dn FETs per phase on this board, so heat is spread between the two. My DX58OG has just 5 phases, and that too using DrMOS (nucleation of heat), it handles 130W CPUs with mild OC just fine. Besides if you want to do extreme OC, you would spend more than $100 on a motherboard. Gigabyte has a 990FX-based motherboard with VRM heatsinks under $140 (990FXA-UD3).
by kid41212003 (5:31 AM) - Reply
i see a retarded face with uneven eyes on the socket.
by nonkX3 (6:06 AM) - Reply
by: btarunr
I think it should be fine. Chokes don't produce as much heat, and there are two-each of up-dn FETs per phase on this board, so heat is spread between the two. My DX58OG has just 5 phases, and that too using DrMOS (nucleation of heat), it handles 130W CPUs with mild OC just fine. Besides if you want to do extreme OC, you would spend more than $100 on a motherboard. Gigabyte has a 990FX-based motherboard with VRM heatsinks under $140 (990FXA-UD3).
i thought so...and i'm not saying it as generally, just happens to me for a few times, again it's just an opinion based on self experiences, i also notice a $80 can stand years of usage, anyway :toast:
by THE_EGG (8:42 AM) - Reply
I would only buy this because I have a Citroen DS3 car. :cool:
4611 Users online, 3.47 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
TechPowerUp on Facebook 
TechPowerUp on Google+ 
TechPowerUp Mobile App
New Forum Posts
02:54 by HalfAHertz
Diablo III Clubhouse (1173)
02:54 by eidairaman1
Green Tea: retro AMD-nVidia build (176)
02:44 by t_ski
Google Android users clubhouse (2170)
02:42 by t_ski
my first SSD (1)
02:41 by GreenD
PSU Deterioration Info (0)
02:38 by Arjai
Milestones (5309)
02:35 by hertz9753
TPU's F@H Team (15194)
02:35 by nleksan
NZXT Build! Aqua S (58)
02:33 by OnePostWonder
CM 690 II Advanced (USB 3.0) (17)
Popular Reviews

Latest VGA Drivers

ATI Catalyst 12.4 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64

NVIDIA GeForce 301.42 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64