Wednesday, February 8th 2012

AMD Rolls Outs Two More FM1 Socket Athlon II X4 Processors

AMD may be busy building up hype for its Trinity-generation APUs (accelerated processing units) but it's still churning out new chips, the latest releases being the rather low-profile Athlon II X4 641 and X4 638. Both of these models are made on 32 nm technology, have an FM1 packaging, and boast four 'Stars' x86 cores just like those found in Llano APUs (but unlike Llano, these Athlons don't have integrated graphics).

The Athlon II X4 641 comes with a core clock of 2.8 GHz, 4 MB of L2 cache, and a 100 W TDP, while the Athlon II X4 638 features a 2.7 GHz clock, 4 MB of L2 cache, and a TDP of 65 W. Both CPUs are priced at $81 (pricing is for 1000-unit tray quantities).
Source: CPU World
Add your own comment

16 Comments on AMD Rolls Outs Two More FM1 Socket Athlon II X4 Processors

#1
The Von Matrices
Any clue as to what distinguishes a xx8 processor from a xx1 processor?
Posted on Reply
#2
imitation
641: 2,8G X4 w/ 100W TDP
638: 2,7G X4 w/ 65W TDP
631: 2,6G X4 w/ 100W TDP
am i missing something here?
Posted on Reply
#3
xenocide
Kind of confused why anyone would go FM1 for a non-Llano CPU...
Posted on Reply
#4
_JP_
I don't understand it either, xenocide. :\
Just release Trinity already, AMD!
The Von MatricesAny clue as to what distinguishes a xx8 processor from a xx1 processor?
TDP, it seems.
Posted on Reply
#5
Red_Machine
Those are probably just Llano chips with defective GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#6
Thefumigator
any idea on how high could be the probability of unlocking the GPU on these?
Posted on Reply
#7
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
i just wished desktops had unlocked multis like the mobile chips. AMD would sure see a big boost in sales there.
Posted on Reply
#8
MikeMurphy
xenocideKind of confused why anyone would go FM1 for a non-Llano CPU...
These make excellent home server chips due mostly in part to the low idle power consumption. They also undervolt extremely well for large reduction in load power consumption :)

Although even as a home server chip it makes more sense to grab a GPU-enabled model.
Posted on Reply
#9
TRWOV
^ Not to mention the improved memory controller. Not a very compelling reason but a benefit nonetheless.
Posted on Reply
#10
Patriot
xenocideKind of confused why anyone would go FM1 for a non-Llano CPU...
32nm... cheap overclocking...
Posted on Reply
#11
badtaylorx
now all i need to see is a phenom ii die shrink to 32nm slap it on the FM1 platform and id buy one!!!
Posted on Reply
#12
imitation
badtaylorxnow all i need to see is a phenom ii die shrink to 32nm slap it on the FM1 platform and id buy one!!!
Dude, that's exactly what this is: four improved "Stars" cores, 32nm, FM1. Just no black editions yet.
Posted on Reply
#13
devguy
imitationDude, that's exactly what this is: four improved "Stars" cores, 32nm, FM1. Just no black editions yet.
Yeah, but it's more of a Propus at 32nm (and with a lot of useless die space from disabled GPU core) than a 32nm Deneb with plenty of L3. At least Llano offers up 1mb L2 cache per core like the Regor Dual Core (that helps).

Black edition FM1 with no GPU core would probably have a fair amount of interest. I wonder if they're gonna make any Black Edition Trinity APUs? If so, they'll probably wait until the end of its lifecycle again like they did with the 3870k (which is stupid to me- focus on the notebook Trinity, but have at least a few launch BEs on day 1 AMD).
Posted on Reply
#14
imitation
I think they just had a lot of trouble with 32nm, trying to get yield up before pushing for higher clocks. They could have labeled a chip BE, but it wouldn't have overclocked like expected for a BE, if at all.

There aren't many benchmarks out there that test the FM1 Athlons specifically, but i guess clock-for-clock they perform the same as the APUs. They are no PhII-Killer, that's for sure, but they're pretty close. The 3870K is a decent CPU by itself, but when overclocked it will beat a stock PhII 980.
Posted on Reply
#15
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
i just wish we could OC APU's, my laptop would love me.
Posted on Reply
#16
imitation
Musselsi just wish we could OC APU's, my laptop would love me.
My netbook would hate me :D
But it would be fairly interesting to see how far the E-350 would go CPU-wise.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 23rd, 2024 19:20 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts