Friday, April 13th 2012

AMD Radeon HD 7900, HD 7700 Series Price Cuts En Route: Report

Despite losing its competitive edge to NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 680, for various reasons AMD was rather slow in adjusting prices of its Radeon HD 7900 series SKUs, the HD 7970 and HD 7950. We are now learning that AMD is preparing the first round of price cuts for its flagship graphics card lineup, since the advent of NVIDIA's Kepler architecture. A Kitguru report pits price cuts of Radeon HD 7970 as much as by US $60 (from $549 to "as low as" $489). The price of HD 7950, on the other hand, is expected to go down by as much as US $55 (that's from $449 to $394). There's also a small price cut in store for Radeon HD 7770, which according to the report, could go down by $15.
Source: Kitguru
Add your own comment

56 Comments on AMD Radeon HD 7900, HD 7700 Series Price Cuts En Route: Report

#51
Gzero
TotallyI'm not stirring s**t here but just wondering. Anyone else notice that the GTX680 has half as many transistors as the HD7970 and uses the same amount of power, how it does that translate into a larger chip?
It doesn't, don't let the fanboi's tell you otherwise. 7970 = GTX480 in terms of direction. Hopefully AMD don't do an Nvidia and drop it all just to gain more frames in games whilst losing compute power.
Posted on Reply
#52
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
GzeroIt doesn't, don't let the fanboi's tell you otherwise. 7970 = GTX480 in terms of direction. Hopefully AMD don't do an Nvidia and drop it all just to gain more frames in games whilst losing compute power.
nah AMD didnt focus on compute power until the market was right hence the 7970 having what the 5800 and 6900 series didnt.

NV dropped it to reduce complexity. 7970 is the First Gen GCN arch which is still pretty much a test subject. Revised and 8x series should be the true finished product
Posted on Reply
#53
Casecutter
eidairaman1NV dropped it to reduce complexity. 7970 is the First Gen GCN arch which is still pretty much a test subject. Revised and 8x series should be the true finished product
No Nvidia couldn't get a cost effective "Top Dog" to work even with "complexity of Turbo Boost", so they figured better to get the gaming crown ASAP by using a much more cost effective "mainstream" chip and then use Turbo Boost (PCB and components') to make it really sing, though not commit harry carey doing so! It was a good move that work in their favor, but Nvidia’s "test subject" went back into R&D (GK110). Tahiti came to market and yes bigger and costly from the fact the TSMC pulled a price increase for 28nm just a few month before it came to market. That price increase was what a GK100 couldn't deal with, that and the added cost of PCB for the Turbo boost made a non-starter.

The thing we see is that 28Nm parts have huge clock potential, but that erodes the efficiency and TDP in a conventional clock application, can AMD bring a "Tahiti" with Dynamic clock controls to market on the next refresh?
Posted on Reply
#55
RevengE
About time, Make way for the Geforce of doom.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 19th, 2024 20:03 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts