Monday, July 23rd 2012

Intel Core i7-3970X Extreme Arrives in Q4

Intel's next high-end desktop processor, the Core i7-3970X Extreme, arrives in Q4, 2012, according to a DonanimHaber report. The i7-3970X is expected to ship with clock speeds of 3.50 GHz, with maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 4.00 GHz. The six-core chip is based on the 32 nm "Sandy Bridge-E" silicon, and built in the LGA2011 package. Its feature-set is consistent with that of the Core i7-3960X, with 15 MB shared L3 cache, HyperThreading, and unlocked base-clock multiplier. In all likelihood, the i7-3970X could displace the i7-3960X from its price-point.
Source: DonanimHaber
Add your own comment

67 Comments on Intel Core i7-3970X Extreme Arrives in Q4

#26
Morgoth
Fueled by Sapphire
gopal16 threaded Xeons what performence do you get from it?
Going to sleep (11:50 PM)
allot in rendering and compiling
Posted on Reply
#27
ensabrenoir
Dj-ElectriCmarketing 1% to sell the others...
yep... just a Maybach....(secretly building a needlessly overpowered. System)
Posted on Reply
#28
treehouse
james888Can I have a dual core 1 terahertz processor instead?
haha so true :toast:
Posted on Reply
#29
HumanSmoke
Crap DaddyThese cpus make 1% of Intel s business.
<sarcasm>
1% of Intel's CPU biz inflames 99% of posters?!

OCCUPY SNB-E !

</sarcasm>
Posted on Reply
#30
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
HumanSmoke1% of Intel's CPU biz inflames 99% of posters?!

OCCUPY SNB-E !
I like my 3820, thank you. :confused:
Posted on Reply
#34
cedrac18
Wile ELittle to no OCing. We want an unlocked, or at least partially unlocked, 8 core.
Ah, my bad. For less then $400, under 100W TDP and packaged water loop to right?
Posted on Reply
#35
Wile E
Power User
cedrac18Ah, my bad. For less then $400, under 100W TDP and packaged water loop to right?
Oh, my bad, I thought you knew this was an enthusiast site.

I'll happily pay a shitload for an unlocked 8c/16t chip. I already have the watercooling though, so thanks anyway.
Posted on Reply
#36
cedrac18
Wile EOh, my bad, I thought you knew this was an enthusiast site.

I'll happily pay a shitload for an unlocked 8c/16t chip. I already have the watercooling though, so thanks anyway.
Good to many people labeling themselves as enthusiasts asking for top tier gear then when the price for said top gear drops they complain its to expensive. Remember the "i want GTX 690s for $600?"
Posted on Reply
#37
Wile E
Power User
But I wasn't complaining about the price, only the locked multipliers. Were you thinking of posts by others?
Posted on Reply
#38
cedrac18
Wile EBut I wasn't complaining about the price, only the locked multipliers. Were you thinking of posts by others?
Yes, it was based generally on the type of complains that often come up. I didn't mean to attack you personally.

But to get back on topic, If they do make a 8c/16t unlocked I7 chip wouldn't it cannibalize on the sale of the xeons which probably have a higher profit margin?

Also such part would probably cost upwards of $1200 at what point does buying a dual socket 2011 mobo and sticking two quads or hexacores in there becomes more beneficial? That's assuming the work needed to be done is multi threaded.
Posted on Reply
#39
LAN_deRf_HA
Even for rendering it's not a clear win for SB-E. A 3770k get's you 75% of the performance for 60% of the power. If you're building a farm that's the way I'd go, and not just for power savings but the initial investment is easily half as much.
Posted on Reply
#40
Wile E
Power User
cedrac18Yes, it was based generally on the type of complains that often come up. I didn't mean to attack you personally.

But to get back on topic, If they do make a 8c/16t unlocked I7 chip wouldn't it cannibalize on the sale of the xeons which probably have a higher profit margin?

Also such part would probably cost upwards of $1200 at what point does buying a dual socket 2011 mobo and sticking two quads or hexacores in there becomes more beneficial? That's assuming the work needed to be done is multi threaded.
Most situations that would have a person or business considering Xeons, wouldn't have them considering the unlocked 8c. The Xtreme line is not multi socket compatible for one example, and they aren't rated for as extreme of conditions as Xeons.

Plus, many of us just like OCing. For serious work, I would build a 16c 2p system. For fun I would build the 8c unlocked system.
Posted on Reply
#41
gopal
i know they are very expensive but they should no do 1% business they will do .5%
Posted on Reply
#42
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
Wile EFor serious work, I would build a 16c 2p system.
This is where I laugh. Would you rather get a 8c Xeon that costs 1,300 USD or more (up to 2,000) or would you want a P2 16c AMD Interlagos rig with 32c total? Honestly, because two Interlagos chips will cost just as much as a single 8c Xeon. In normal cases it's a lot of power for any normal user, but someone who does rendering or OLAP might want something like that, but obviously not for overclocking. At this point whatever software you're going to be running clearly likes more threads and how could you turn down 16 more threads for the same price, because for multi-threaded workloads Interlagos shines.
gopali know they are very expensive but they should no do 1% business they will do .5%
I think this pisses off all the people who normally wouldn't get an EE chip, so that 1% probably will stay at 1%.
Posted on Reply
#43
gopal
Use P4 for a year and then upgrade it to the 2600 you will see improvements:D
Posted on Reply
#44
Random Murderer
The Anti-Midas
AquinusI like my 3820, thank you. :confused:
Same here.
I'm looking forward to IVB-E, not necessarily more cores. If intel were to release a 4c/8t IVB-E right now, I would be all over it.
Besides, this 3820 is pretty cherry and as soon as i go water 5GHz+ 24/7 doesn't seem out of the question. That should more than compensate for being two cores shy of the others, except in benchmarks, and it'll draw less power and make less heat than a 6c/12t chip.

EDIT: It seems to me that a lot of people nowadays just think "hurr durr, more cores = better." This is only the case if you have software that is multi-threaded and can utilize your multiple cores. Even still, most(non-workstation) multi-threaded software around currently is only dual-threaded, with a small percentage being quad-threaded or more. Even most high-end games are only quad-threaded, so why buy a hexa-core processor for anything but benchmarking or workstation work? It just doesn't make sense to me:shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#45
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
Random MurdererSame here.
I'm looking forward to IVB-E, not necessarily more cores. If intel were to release a 4c/8t IVB-E right now, I would be all over it.
Besides, this 3820 is pretty cherry and as soon as i go water 5GHz+ 24/7 doesn't seem out of the question. That should more than compensate for being two cores shy of the others, except in benchmarks, and it'll draw less power and make less heat than a 6c/12t chip.
The extra L3 per core helps and the quad-channel memory makes sure that none of the cores get starved for memory bandwidth too. Its got a strong IMC, plenty of PCI-E lanes, and loaded with features (I'm digging the VT-d and being able to overclock.) It really is a great platform if you get a nice motherboard and doesn't cost too much over a maxed out 1155 rig. I think it was worth it. :cool:
Posted on Reply
#46
Morgoth
Fueled by Sapphire
comparing my old I7 965 vs my 2x Xeon E5520 the improvement has increased allot on the heavy cpu tasked aplications i use
also i can OC my xeons
Posted on Reply
#47
radrok
Morgothcomparing my old I7 965 vs my 2x Xeon E5520 the improvement has increased allot on the heavy cpu tasked aplications i use
also i can OC my xeons
Yes but you can't overclock LGA 2011 Xeons, that's what started the discussion.

I strongly agree with Wile E, Intel should push out an extreme edition 8c/16t because 3MB of L3 cache can't justify the price jump from 3930K to 3960X/3970X.
Posted on Reply
#48
gopal
Are "X" Models are also Unlocked chips like "K" ?
btw, "X" are very expensive
Posted on Reply
#49
radrok
Extreme SKUs (X) have always been multiplier unlocked and they were the only CPUs unlocked from Intel until K SKUs started to come out.

I agree that they are very expensive but when the 980X came out the performance was too yummy for me to pass.
Posted on Reply
#50
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
Why all the talk about 8 cores and 12 cores? I mean Intel can kick ass with fewer cores than AMD right now and really how many games or even programs out there need any more than 4 cores? This is just Intel making AMD look weak and they are.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 20th, 2024 00:29 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts