Saturday, November 2nd 2013

GeForce GTX 780 Ti Specifications Leaked

NVIDIA's upcoming GeForce GTX 780 Ti is configured to be a notch above the GTX TITAN after all, as leaked specifications sheets reveal it utilize all components available on the GK110 silicon. Specifications sheets of a Galaxy-branded GTX 780 Ti was leaked to the web by @asder00, which reveal it to feature the full complement of 2,880 CUDA cores on the GK110 silicon, which work out to 240 texture memory units (TMUs). Other specifications include 48 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 3 GB of memory. Clock speeds include 876 MHz core, 928 MHz GPU Boost, and 1750 MHz (7.00 GHz GDDR5-effective) memory. With these specifications on paper, the GTX 780 Ti shouldn't have too many problems beating the GTX TITAN, and with it, the Radeon R9 290X from AMD. It features everything there is on the GK110, half the memory of the GTX TITAN, but one that's faster.
Add your own comment

38 Comments on GeForce GTX 780 Ti Specifications Leaked

#1
terrastrife
by: Dj-ElectriC
Dear NVIDIA, you don't fight a 4GB 4K ready card with a 3GB card. That's a big mistake.
Well the next division for memory capacity available is 6GB, so get that instead.

But then you'd say Dear AMD, you don't fight a 6GB 4K ready card with a 4GB card. That's a big mistake.
Posted on Reply
#2
DanishDevil
I've actually been doing some testing with Battlefield 4 maxed out on Ultra without motion blur, and I'm pretty sure I'm capping the 3GB frame buffer of my GTX 780 at 2560x1600...



I'll be looking forward to a 6GB variant of the GTX 780 Ti. Or two.
Posted on Reply
#3
DeadSkull
No way the Ti will have more shaders then the Titan.

Same number or less. It would be stupid for nvidia to playits biggest trump card right away, when based on performance numbers all nvidia has to do is match the Titan shader/tmu count and bump the clock speed a little.
Posted on Reply
#4
terrastrife
by: DeadSkull
No way the Ti will have more shaders then the Titan.

Same number or less. It would be stupid for nvidia to playits biggest trump card right away, when based on performance numbers all nvidia has to do is match the Titan shader/tmu count and bump the clock speed a little.
Why not? TITAN _IS NOT_ a 700 series part, remember, it also is not a full GK110 core, it was made "because we can". It still is better for pro work too.
Technology evolves, it was a showcase GPU, intended to be superseded soon enough by 'mainstream' parts.
Posted on Reply
#5
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
by: Dj-ElectriC
Dear NVIDIA, you don't fight a 4GB 4K ready card with a 3GB card. That's a big mistake.
In our own testing, BF4 at 2560x1600 uses just 2.1 GB of VRAM (tested on a GTX Titan, x64 executable used). 3 GB meets its RSR, and at 7 GHz, you'd be looking at 336 GB/s (higher than R9 290X) memory bandwidth. I think at these specifications, 780 Ti may cut it at 4K.
Posted on Reply
#6
OC-Rage
why

by: HumanSmoke
OC-Rage has his location as Iran. My guessing is that their grasp of English is somewhat better than your grasp of Persian. Oh, and BTW, it's English not english :shadedshu

The price has been already commented upon and corrected by MxPhenom 216 immediately above your post.
Is there really any need for you to act like an arse, or are TPU offering bonus points for acting like a junior cyberwarrior ?
i sory for bad english sory sory

:shadedshu:wtf::banghead:
Posted on Reply
#7
OC-Rage
hey friend

by: NeoXF
I seeing the english language hasn`t been that kind to you...
Also, wrong. It`s 3gB and 700 dollars.
hi my friend

:shadedshu

ok * i bad english type i dont use eng lang few time im use eng lang im persian

natural in bad type eng
Posted on Reply
#8
HumanSmoke
by: OC-Rage
i sory for bad english sory sory
:shadedshu:wtf::banghead:
I was DEFENDING your grammar.

What's with the emoticon overload?
Posted on Reply
#9
Nihilus
by: btarunr
In our own testing, BF4 at 2560x1600 uses just 2.1 GB of VRAM (tested on a GTX Titan, x64 executable used). 3 GB meets its RSR, and at 7 GHz, you'd be looking at 336 GB/s (higher than R9 290X) memory bandwidth. I think at these specifications, 780 Ti may cut it at 4K.
No doubt that 3 GB is plenty for 1600p gaming. Even 2 GB will be enough in most cases as we have seen with GTX 690 in quad fire. The problem for some might be future proofing. It would be nice to be able to just add a cheap 2nd card in a year or two for 4k gaming or even triple screen gaming. In that case, future buyers might be worried about investing in a card that has only 3 GB memory.
Posted on Reply
#10
MxPhenom 216
Corsair Fanboy
by: DeadSkull
No way the Ti will have more shaders then the Titan.

Same number or less. It would be stupid for nvidia to playits biggest trump card right away, when based on performance numbers all nvidia has to do is match the Titan shader/tmu count and bump the clock speed a little.
There is some talk going around about possibility of Titan production stopping very soon with the Ti coming out. Which would make sense, since there are so many sources saying that with the introduction of the B1 stepping of the Kepler silicon that the Ti will be a fully featured GK110 chip. (Not sure if the compute aspects will be intact still though)

There is also rumors of a black edition of the 780ti with 6gb and 12GB of vram.
Posted on Reply
#11
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
by: Nihilus
No doubt that 3 GB is plenty for 1600p gaming. Even 2 GB will be enough in most cases as we have seen with GTX 690 in quad fire. The problem for some might be future proofing. It would be nice to be able to just add a cheap 2nd card in a year or two for 4k gaming or even triple screen gaming. In that case, future buyers might be worried about investing in a card that has only 3 GB memory.
I've been "future-proofing" myself against affordable 2560x1600 displays for over 4 years now. Still no luck with finding one under $300. The story will repeat itself with Ultra HD. Display makers would rather have you buy that retarded 2560x1080 Ultra-Wide, and that's going to be the next resolution ramthroat. In either case, 3 GB is more than sufficient.
Posted on Reply
#12
haswrong
by: btarunr
In either case, 3 GB is more than sufficient.
by: Am*
According to these "leaks" there will be 3GB, 6GB and 12GB (pointless)
ok guys, so if i wanna play with my graphics card, i am disallowed to buy 6 or 12gig 780 and absolutely have to only buy titan? not everyone uses the thing for gaming 24/7.. but even if, there are methods of visualisation that can exploit larger portions of memory.. :ohwell:
Posted on Reply
#13
rtwjunkie
by: OC-Rage
i sory for bad english sory sory
You should not be sorry for your English. It is perfectly understandable! It really bothers me when someone insults another person's English ability, since this is an international forum, and I would say over half the members first language is not English.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment