Wednesday, December 6th 2006

AMD to cut FX-70 prices.

Before the CPU's are available, AMD has decided to cut the prices. QuadFX processors are now $100 cheaper. The FX70 series will cost $499/699/899 for the FX70/72/74, respectively. The FX70 series of AMD CPU's should be available later this month.
Source: The Inquirer
Add your own comment

18 Comments on AMD to cut FX-70 prices.

#1
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
So... what socket, ddr2? And also, clockspeeds?
Posted on Reply
#2
zekrahminator
McLovin
I heard something about Socket F, and I know nothing about the clock speeds. Best to wait until they actually make the thing available...lol. Too bad FX70 isn't faster then Kentsfield (or whatever the Intel quad core thingy is).
Posted on Reply
#3
ATIonion
PVTCaboose1337So... what socket, ddr2? And also, clockspeeds?
i think AM2 and DDR2 as well..maybe socket F...but dont these cards come in pairs or am i thinking of another model from AMD....also if they do sell in pairs then what mobo will be available for those when they are released???
Posted on Reply
#4
bornfree
More AMD bashing from the Inquirer... SOS, DD.
Posted on Reply
#5
InfDamarvel
If it wasnt for that damn power problem...
Posted on Reply
#6
jocksteeluk
if it wasnt for the negative press recently AMD wouldnt eve bother with this price reduction, why are they even bothering to produce and release a product that is inferior to its competitor. Didnt they do benchmarks and such when they were developing them?
Posted on Reply
#7
pt
not a suicide-bomber
jocksteelukif it wasnt for the negative press recently AMD wouldnt eve bother with this price reduction, why are they even bothering to produce and release a product that is inferior to its competitor. Didnt they do benchmarks and such when they were developing them?
yes, but they need something to counter quick, this was the answer
Posted on Reply
#8
shoman24v
Look at the prices, $500 bucks for a quad core? It may be slower then an Intel but it sure is cheaper. At least AMD didn't half ass their quad core.

AMD is the shit, well used to be according to everybody. Everybody seems to forget how long AMD bitch slapped Intel.
Posted on Reply
#9
stevorob
And Intel was bitch slapping AMD for many many years before that...
Posted on Reply
#10
Track
Wait, Quad-Core for 500$??
Posted on Reply
#11
Azn Tr14dZ
Yeah, a Quad Core for $500 compared to an Intel QX6700 for $1599, which would you pick? Even with the special motherboard made by Asus, and a Thermaltake AMD approved case it would still be cheaper...not bad IMO.
Posted on Reply
#12
wazzledoozle
I thought QuadFX was two dual core cpu's for use in special dual socket mobos, I think it was called 4x4 early on... or is that something different? If it is a quad core, $500 is pretty good, $125 per core. Edit: It is a package with two cpu's that require a dual socket mobo. Meh.
Posted on Reply
#13
Azn Tr14dZ
Seems like the motherboard is solid though, being made by Asus, not bad.
Posted on Reply
#14
JC316
Knows what makes you tick
Quad core.....WTF??? They aren't even fully using dual core yet. Why waste money now when they will drop even further in price later on?
Posted on Reply
#15
Wile E
Power User
JC316Quad core.....WTF??? They aren't even fully using dual core yet. Why waste money now when they will drop even further in price later on?
If you're building/buying a system from scratch, and are the type of person that keeps a system until an upgrade is required (AKA: a normal person), then it makes perfect sense to go quad, if you can afford it. It will still have some legs when these dual cores long ran out of steam.
Posted on Reply
#16
pt
not a suicide-bomber
JC316Quad core.....WTF??? They aren't even fully using dual core yet. Why waste money now when they will drop even further in price later on?
GRAPHICAL WORK use it a lot
autocad, rendering, 3d modeling, etc...
that's why i want one :D
Posted on Reply
#17
Zubasa
JC316Quad core.....WTF??? They aren't even fully using dual core yet. Why waste money now when they will drop even further in price later on?
Graphical work can be done with the help of GPU.
Also things like compressing large files and converting high quality video will use lots of CPU power, since they rely solely on the CPU. (The HDD and ram also....)
Posted on Reply
#18
Grings
its a dual core, for dual processor(physical) use, 2x2 would be a more accurate description
they have a quad core in the works, but thats not out for a good few months yet
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 24th, 2024 20:22 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts