Tuesday, July 7th 2015

AMD Updates Second Quarter Outlook

AMD today announced that revenue for the second quarter ended June 27, 2015 is expected to be lower than previously guided. The company now expects second quarter revenue to decrease approximately 8 percent sequentially, compared to the previous guidance of down 3 percent, plus or minus 3 percent. The sequential decrease is primarily due to weaker than expected consumer PC demand impacting the company's Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) APU sales. The company expects second quarter channel sales and channel inventory reduction efforts to be in-line with the company's plans.

The company anticipates non-GAAP gross margin to be approximately 28 percent, compared to the previous non-GAAP guidance of approximately 32 percent primarily due to a higher mix of Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment sales and lower than anticipated Computing and Graphics segment APU unit volumes due to weaker than expected OEM PC product demand. Additionally the company anticipates GAAP gross margin to be further impacted by a one-time charge of approximately $33 million associated with a technology node transition from 20 nanometer (nm) to FinFET. The company started several product designs in 20 nm that will instead transition to the leading-edge FinFET node.

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the second quarter are expected to be approximately $830 million, in line with expectations.

AMD will report second quarter 2015 results after market close on Thursday, July 16, 2015. AMD will hold a conference call for the financial community at 2:30 p.m. PT (5:30 p.m. ET) that day to discuss second quarter financial results and to provide information regarding expected third quarter results. AMD will provide a real-time audio broadcast of the teleconference on the Investor Relations page. The webcast will be available for 10 days after the conference call.
Add your own comment

20 Comments on AMD Updates Second Quarter Outlook

#5
john_
Really bad news for
AMD fans
Intel fans
Nvidia fans
Posted on Reply
#6
R-T-B
john_Really bad news for
AMD fans
Intel fans
Nvidia fans
Indeed. Lack of competition always sucks.
Posted on Reply
#7
renz496
HumanSmokeSo what happened to the cries of outrage at TSMC's incompetence and wishes/predictions of AMD rise to dominance on the back of GloFo? Is that on hold for the week?
Before Fury X comes out there were a lot of talk about Fiji will use GF 28nm process and some even treat it as a fact. In the end AMD still depending on TSMC when it comes to gpu.
Posted on Reply
#8
GhostRyder
Lack of OEM's OP...

They may get a bolster later in the year depending on GPU sales but so far they really have not done much this year. A sale is looking more and more imminent...
Posted on Reply
#9
ensabrenoir
.....maybe a buy out would not be bad. New capital, management and direction.
Posted on Reply
#10
jagd
Problem is their x86 license is not transferable , anyone planning to buy AMD need permission from intel first.
ensabrenoir.....maybe a buy out would not be bad. New capital, management and direction.
Posted on Reply
#11
ensabrenoir
jagdProblem is their x86 license is not transferable , anyone planning to buy AMD need permission from intel first.
....so intel makes even more money no matter what.....even if Amd new owners brings amd on par with intel. Im sure intel wont protest...they prob got like 3 generations of new products they're sitting on because there is no reason to release them yet.
Posted on Reply
#12
john_
Being a Greek and looking at AMD this period is like disaster in stereo.
Posted on Reply
#13
renz496
ensabrenoir....so intel makes even more money no matter what.....even if Amd new owners brings amd on par with intel. Im sure intel wont protest...they prob got like 3 generations of new products they're sitting on because there is no reason to release them yet.
Honestly i'm not sure about that. Why intel so desperately to bar nvidia from getting x86 license despite knowing nvidia already going for ARM for their cpu? I dare to bet if big company like samsung or qualcom interested with x86 license intel will not going to sit tight and just give them permission to use x86.
Posted on Reply
#14
Steevo
HumanSmokeSo what happened to the cries of outrage at TSMC's incompetence and wishes/predictions of AMD rise to dominance on the back of GloFo? Is that on hold for the week?
It was supposed to have a ?

Both sets of companies GloFlo, and TSMC, and Nvidia, and AMD have been suffering the poor implementation of nodes and processes.

At this point I don't foresee AMD taking the lead back from anyone, instead if they work hard and catch a break with good designs and a good process they may be able to return to profitability next year, but that is going to require a lot of ground work, some early samples given out of Zen and any new process GPUs. At this point they are profitable with the chips they make for the consoles, some technology royalties, and the initial unique sales of Fury and residual sales of older tech. None of which is profitable enough to support the organization they have in place.


Those are the facts from what I can see. What i would like to see is a pure graphics card released, with gaming performance being the primary goal, not compute as well. Then have them release a cheap low power core with a few shaders and the UVD module on it they can strap on to lower power consumption on high end cards, and to make low power cards with. Then get Zen out, even on the older node at a quad core with SMT but with the higher IPC needed to perform, even with higher power consumption. People will buy it if the performance is there and its not a server spinoff chip.
Posted on Reply
#16
HumanSmoke
SteevoIt was supposed to have a ?
HumanSmokeAcquisition rumours + End of financial quarter reporting = Shitty earnings call and need to bolster share price. Rinse. Repeat.
SteevoAMD FinFET

wccftech.com/tsmc-begins-10nm-finfet-prototyping/
It was both rhetorical, and a reference to a story posted earlierin the day:
Additionally the company anticipates GAAP gross margin to be further impacted by a one-time charge of approximately $33 million associated with a technology node transition from 20 nanometer (nm) to FinFET.
Since Globalfoundries 20nm LPM has been unceremoniously knifed in a back alley, AMD has taken an impairment charge 0f $33 million to rework its logic for GloFo's (Samsung licenced) 14nmFF process.
Posted on Reply
#17
bubbleawsome
People have been talking about AMD buyouts since 2012. Sure, it might happen, but it probably won't any time soon.
Posted on Reply
#18
Steevo
Common practice in big business is to kill profits and milk it for cash so it's cheaper to buy, then come in and take over.


Or this could be AMD being used to launder money for other uses where the same owners have major shares in the foundry and the company.

I may have to buy a few shares at this new lower price in case of a buyout, or for shits and giggles.
Posted on Reply
#19
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
Dj-ElectriCGrab your skydiving goggle folks.
www.google.com/finance?cid=327
Last time it was this low, it went back up to at least 4.00. Might be a good time to buy if you want to take a gamble. I doubt it will get much lower that where it is now.
SteevoI may have to buy a few shares at this new lower price in case of a buyout, or for shits and giggles.
That's what I was thinking.
Posted on Reply
#20
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
ensabrenoir....so intel makes even more money no matter what.....even if Amd new owners brings amd on par with intel. Im sure intel wont protest...they prob got like 3 generations of new products they're sitting on because there is no reason to release them yet.
I'm thinking it's the opposite, and they are sitting on nothing. I think Intel has gotten lazy, and a serious competition would belt them back behind AMD again like the late 90's and early 2000's. It literally would take competition like that to force Intel to truly innovate leap ahead again in the CPU race.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 19th, 2024 01:53 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts