that is pretty fast.

Why is cpuz showing 3002.2 mhz?

AirbrushkidWhy is cpuz showing 3002.2 mhz?

I think it displays the multiplayer wrong...I already hate cpuz for that reason, it shows my E6300 working at 6x multi for some reason. Last 3 new versions of cpuz didn't help fix the issue.

malwareI think it displays the multiplayer wrong...I already hate cpuz for that reason, it shows my E6300 working at 6x multi for some reason. Last 3 new versions of cpuz didn't help fix the issue.

Thats probably because you have speedstep, c1E, and/or thermal management on. It lowers the multiplier when not in use to consume less power.

JC316Thats probably because you have speedstep, c1E, and/or thermal management on. It lowers the multiplier when not in use to consume less power.

At 3.2GHz do you think I have the thermal managment on? ;) I'm aware of all the options you mention, but that's not the problem here. Lots of users have this issue with cpuz.

Oh no, it is a Clockgen overclock, so it isn't valid. Everyone start flaming him.......

malwareAt 3.2GHz do you think I have the thermal managment on? ;) I'm aware of all the options you mention, but that's not the problem here. Lots of users have this issue with cpuz.

Hmm, thats odd, your board might have something of it's own. I had all of those turned off and then found a reduced power option on my board that was doing it.

malwareAt 3.2GHz do you think I have the thermal managment on? ;) I'm aware of all the options you mention, but that's not the problem here. Lots of users have this issue with cpuz.

I just disable C1E Support, have you tryed that ? I even have speedstep enabled I find it only works at default settings so try the dis. C1E it should work ;)

Just like I said...yeah I am aware of all the options and I've tried them all, no change. Anyways, my CPU works at 3.2GHz 24/7 I don't care what cpuz says.
To be honest, my wrong cpuz freqs started from version 1.39, before this version everything worked right for me, with 1.38 I had no problems.

P.S. btw this is Shamino's 6GHz thread, not my cpuz bug, stick to the topic. :)

SWEET, I wanna see some benchies

Meh only 6ghz, i can run faster than that.

magibegMeh only 6ghz, i can run faster than that.

Yeah, but this guy did it without heating up the neighborhood. Snap! ;)

SteevoOh no, it is a Clockgen overclock, so it isn't valid. Everyone start flaming him.......

I have got my highest clock using Easytune 5... I don't care how you get the OC all that i care about is what you are running at. You can get the clock anyway you want.

mdm-adphYeah, but this guy did it without heating up the neighborhood. Snap! ;)

Did you just call me hot? :eek:

magibegDid you just call me hot? :eek:

no i don't think he called you hot but he called your CPU hot but this is HOT!!

haha, nice pic. Amazing OC too, first 6GHZ I have seen verified.

he only had 1.59 on the core... Surely a watercooled setup could handle that???

Then again I know how hot the friggin quads get, even at 1.4v.....

Superpi would be pretty quick on that thing... :)

DrunkenMafiahe only had 1.59 on the core... Surely a watercooled setup could handle that???

Then again I know how hot the friggin quads get, even at 1.4v.....

Superpi would be pretty quick on that thing... :)

I doubt it was only 1.59. CPU-z tends to misread vcore when you pass a certain point.

I just want to see these kids play a game or use a 3d intensive application for two hours, then come back and tell us it's 'stable.'


:)

liquid nitrogen, 2.5v probably, and most likely stable
liquid nitrogen can do anything :D