Monday, October 29th 2007

Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition Hits 510MHz FSB on AMD RD790 on Air

Regardless of theoretical performance, the upcoming AMD RD790 and Athlon 64 Black Edition line of processors certainly are overclockable and feature-laden. On nothing but air cooling, MSI testers were able to get an RD790 chipset to a remarkable 510MHz FSB speed. Once the RD790 is released with PCI Express 2, CrossFire X, and support for goodies such as Phenom, we will see one seriously good platform.

Source: Nordic Hardware
Add your own comment

24 Comments on Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition Hits 510MHz FSB on AMD RD790 on Air

#2
JC316
Knows what makes you tick
Thats great, but what was the clock speed on the chip? 510 is ok, but if your CPU can't go that high, it's worthless(Unless you lower the multiplier and then the only benifit is the RAM speed).
Posted on Reply
#3
SpookyWillow
i think it was just a test to see how how the fsb can go.

Posted on Reply
#4
Ben Clarke
So they effectivly lowered the speed of the chip to get a higher FSB. Smart. :wtf:
Posted on Reply
#5
mdm-adph
by: Ben Clarke
So they effectivly lowered the speed of the chip to get a higher FSB. Smart. :wtf:
Sometimes it can be, I've heard -- not by as much as they did in this test, of course. Getting 510mhz here was merely a Proof of Concept.
Posted on Reply
#6
nflesher87
Staff
correct mdm, this is simply to show there is no significant FSB wall at least up to 510FSB which is awesome and means that the new phenoms should have a ton of potential on RD790!
Posted on Reply
#7
Sasqui
Looks like they are showing the limits of both the Phenom and the RD790 by dropping the multiplier.

The Phenom shown in that screenshot has a ~25% overclock.

Unfortunately, the screenshot above (from the link) looks seriously photo-shopped.
Posted on Reply
#8
SK-1
by: Sasqui
Looks like they are showing the limits of both the Phenom and the RD790 by dropping the multiplier.

The Phenom shown in that screenshot has a ~25% overclock.

Unfortunately, the screenshot above (from the link) looks seriously photo-shopped.
What do you look for when deciding if it is shopped or not?
Just curious.
Posted on Reply
#9
zekrahminator
McLovin
CPU-Z screen added, I'm sorry I forgot about it earlier :banghead:.
Posted on Reply
#10
mandelore
shouldnt it be bus speed and HT link on that cpuz screeny, not FSB and bus? It is AMD after all....

however, it may just be a bug, who knows. I would like to think it could handle that high an bus speed as it will be sweet for hi end RAM modules

like this:

Posted on Reply
#11
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
Amazing potential. When I first looked at it, I was like the poster above who said, 510mhz and a multi of 5 and not much for speed. But when I thought about it, the Phenom has amazing potential to clock to 4ghz or more. Sweet score for AMD
Posted on Reply
#12
Steevo
Shouldnt the lettering be blue, and the text in the box?
Posted on Reply
#13
theonetruewill
by: Steevo
Shouldnt the lettering be blue, and the text in the box?
I get the lettering as black when use the Windows Classic theme.
Posted on Reply
#14
Grings
if its photoshopped, why does the validation number work?

Posted on Reply
#15
Sovereign
by: mandelore
shouldnt it be bus speed and HT link on that cpuz screeny, not FSB and bus? It is AMD after all....
You get it reported as Bus Speed when you look at the pic provided on validation links. With CPU-Z 1.41, my Santa Ana 1216 Opteron is shown as a Santa Rosa so things like this are to be expected.

My CPU-Z 1.41 Validation screenie :
Posted on Reply
#16
nflesher87
Staff
I guess it's looking fairly legit then :)
Posted on Reply
#17
a111087
so, who's getting AMD for their next PC :)
Posted on Reply
#18
yogurt_21
count me in, though I have to say my upgrades are going to get farther and farther apart. married and bout to have kids.

and if they could get that result on phase with an 8x mult, I'd buy both easily.
Posted on Reply
#19
Wile E
Power User
by: Sasqui
Looks like they are showing the limits of both the Phenom and the RD790 by dropping the multiplier.

The Phenom shown in that screenshot has a ~25% overclock.

Unfortunately, the screenshot above (from the link) looks seriously photo-shopped.
It's not a Phenom. It's a 6400+, and it's actually 22% underclocked.
Posted on Reply
#20
mandelore
by: Sovereign
You get it reported as Bus Speed when you look at the pic provided on validation links. With CPU-Z 1.41, my Santa Ana 1216 Opteron is shown as a Santa Rosa so things like this are to be expected.

My CPU-Z 1.41 Validation screenie :
ahhh good to know then! :toast:
Posted on Reply
#21
mitsirfishi
that is pretty sick but class :D well done
Posted on Reply
#22
Gzero
Right... so AMD prove they can do 500fsb and some you think thats a great reason to buy AMD cpus again... I fail to see the logic...

Having a high fsb might allow more memory bandwidth but if it isn't actually filled and used by the cpu then isn't it overkill, like giving a mini a Ferrari engine?

For example: Pentium 4 (prescott + D models) look at all the good quad pumping the fsb did for intel when they finally realised that 5ghz wasn't really a viable consumer option. :/

And AMD aren't using DDR3 so this is a bit premature :P
Posted on Reply
#23
mandelore
by: Gzero
Right... so AMD prove they can do 500fsb and some you think thats a great reason to buy AMD cpus again... I fail to see the logic...

Having a high fsb might allow more memory bandwidth but if it isn't actually filled and used by the cpu then isn't it overkill, like giving a mini a Ferrari engine?
lol....
Posted on Reply
#24
AddSub
so, who's getting AMD for their next PC
Me, as I have for the past six years. And the one after that, and the one AFTER that, and the...well you get the idea. Unless AMD goes completely out of business, and even then there would be a steady supply of AMD parts for years on eBay and such. I'm done with Intel. I kicked that bit*h out, threw her sh*t on the street and blocked her phone number. As for VIA? I don't play with toys anymore.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment