| Thursday, May 8 2008 |
Cooler Master's engineers have taken the idea of releasing a fanless cooler seriously and have come up with a passive CPU cooler called Hyper Z600 that can cool both Intel and AMD CPUs drawing up to 89W without any fans attached to it. You can add two optional 120mm fans to the opposing sides of the heat-sink in a push-pull configuration, though. The Hyper Z600 measures 127.28 x 127.28 x 160 mm and weighs exactly 1045g. The heatsink structure features interlaced aluminium fins, six heatpipes connected to a mirror-coated copper base and Cooler Master's unique "X" design that creates lower back pressure to make air pass through the heatsink faster. Compatible with all existing Intel and AMD CPU sockets, the passive Cooler Master Z600 will be available soon for around £34.99.
Source: HEXUS.net
Source: HEXUS.net
User comments
Huge! I hope it doesn't use push-pins... I like the fans they are using in the picutre too.
Why is it called "passive" when it has a fan?
looks retardedly large.
by: [I.R.A]_FBiits not really that large...... i have a 12cm fan on my heatsink... so basically this is the same size.. (12cm squared)
looks retardedly large.
by: [I.R.A]_FBiI agree...very large and extremely heavy...:twitch:
looks retardedly large.
by: spearman914Fans are optional.
Why is it called "passive" when it has a fan?
by: [I.R.A]_FBiNot that huge but the only disadsvantages is decreasing air flow rate and limits memory sticks' heights. See thats a tuniq tower 120mm, not that big of a deal
looks retardedly large.
big f'ing cooler!
looks nice though!
looks nice though!
I don't think that will fit in an HTPC.... or my PC for that matter.
I think the title has a typo... I believe it should say "Z600 Massive Cooler"...
by: muka3dlollers, i agree.
I think the title has a typo... I believe it should say "Z600 Massive Cooler"...
The fins should be vertical if it's ever intended to be used passively. How do they think that parallel horizontal fins can dissipate heat?
Nevermind, I guess it'll never go into any HTPC case or the like that lays down.
Nevermind, I guess it'll never go into any HTPC case or the like that lays down.
by: erockerNo, you can see from that tiny picture that it's bolted on with a metal plate with 4 screws. Like the fans too.
Huge! I hope it doesn't use push-pins... I like the fans they are using in the picutre too.
It's so wide the other way too, that the outputfan will work fine as one for push-pull.
looks like a Cooler that Titan Released few years ago.
by: pentastar111
I agree...very large and extremely heavy...:twitch:
I've seen bigger:
Tom's Hardware
by: pentastar111yeah... goddamn 2.3 pounds. that would bend my mobo in half unless i turned my pc on its side. :laugh:
I agree...very large and extremely heavy...:twitch:
The main question: is it better than TRUE?
by: hv43082Nope. Check on frosty tech.
The main question: is it better than TRUE?
by: tkpenaltyThan nuff said!
Nope. Check on frosty tech.
Why is the Ultra 120 Better then the Ultra 120 Extreme on frostytech??? Is it not supposed to be new and improved version of it?
1 Kilo and change is a bit much unless you have a bench setup and your MoBo lies flat all the time. I would never attempt to use that in an upright position. I can just hear the sound of splintering silicon.....
by: AphexDreamerI think everyone got confused on that one. Bigger doesn't necessarily equate to better performance.
Why is the Ultra 120 Better then the Ultra 120 Extreme on frostytech??? Is it not supposed to be new and improved version of it?
Let me explain what i mean by "true comparison":
1 - Coolers should be tested as they are sold, meaning using the thermal paste and fan(s) provided in the package and tested in all there possibilities (ie: Noctua has adapters included with the fans, so 1 test for each should be observed).
2 - All coolers should be tested using the same fan(s), thermal paste in order to ensure that the differences observed are from the coolers and not from the usage of different fans or thermal paste.
Standard reviews of CPU coolers cover point 1 but i have no knowledge of reviews covering point 2: there's a difference between the cooling power of an "out-of-the-box" cooler and it's total cooling power, IMHO.
1 - Coolers should be tested as they are sold, meaning using the thermal paste and fan(s) provided in the package and tested in all there possibilities (ie: Noctua has adapters included with the fans, so 1 test for each should be observed).
2 - All coolers should be tested using the same fan(s), thermal paste in order to ensure that the differences observed are from the coolers and not from the usage of different fans or thermal paste.
Standard reviews of CPU coolers cover point 1 but i have no knowledge of reviews covering point 2: there's a difference between the cooling power of an "out-of-the-box" cooler and it's total cooling power, IMHO.
by: HTCAgreed for the most part, however coolers like the ultra 120 don't come with a fan however they are still meant to be used with one. Does this mean they would have to be run passive for the first bit of testing?
Let me explain what i mean by "true comparison":
1 - Coolers should be tested as they are sold, meaning using the thermal paste and fan(s) provided in the package and tested in all there possibilities (ie: Noctua has adapters included with the fans, so 1 test for each should be observed).
2 - All coolers should be tested using the same fan(s), thermal paste in order to ensure that the differences observed are from the coolers and not from the usage of different fans or thermal paste.
Standard reviews of CPU coolers cover point 1 but i have no knowledge of reviews covering point 2: there's a difference between the cooling power of an "out-of-the-box" cooler and it's total cooling power, IMHO.