Tuesday, July 8 2008
Another good story from the Chinese website Coolaler.com has come to my attention. It brings along some good news for the Intel followers. Intel's highest-clocked 45nm Wolfdale processor, the yet unreleased Core 2 Duo E8600 appears to have some great overclocking potential. Coupled with a DFI LP UT P35 motherboard, 4GB of DDR2 memory, single Radeon HD 4870 card, and liquid nitrogen (LN) cooling the E8600 CPU was able to reach 6146.9MHz (614x10). That compared to its default speed of 3.33GHz (333x10), and we might have a new dual core overclocking winner. According to the information available on the Net, when released the E8600 will cost somewhere between $266 and $299.



Source: Coolaler
posted by malware - 7:16 PM |  Related News

User comments
26 to 42 of 42 | Go to Page 1 2    Previous | Next
by Solaris17 (July 8th - 9:27 PM) - Reply
by: DOM
i dont think so unless with 2v+
i agree look at the SS 6.1ghz at 1.8v i love core2's but oltae scaling is horrible.

AMD's cant clock as high but the scaling imo is beter if you want to make something more stable bump it .5v and you can pull that off till the chips cap but core2's its lke after acertain mark its .5 next 50mhz .75 etc.
by Grings (July 8th - 9:55 PM) - Reply
My 8400 is running at 8ghz...

















...Using the dodgy Ebayer clock calculation technique ;)
by Tatty_One (July 8th - 10:52 PM) - Reply
More important than this fantastic acheivement, this could possibly see an 8600 hitting 5gig on good air......now that would really be something :rockout:
by 1c3d0g (July 8th - 11:21 PM) - Reply
Exactly. It's not like everyone has liquid nitrogen laying around...
by Chryonn (July 8th - 11:33 PM) - Reply
Speaking of which, where do non-scientific personnel obtain liquid nitrogen from? it's not like you can phone in an quantity
by WarEagleAU (July 8th - 11:39 PM) - Reply
Alright, I think its time I built me an intel rig around this chip and a comparable mobo :D
by HTC (July 9th - 12:09 AM) - Reply
Did you dudes notice how much RAM was used in this OC?



That much OC with 4 GB of RAM: WOW!!!
by InnocentCriminal (July 9th - 12:28 AM) - Reply
Pffft! LN - I'd be more excited if we saw 5GHz air or watercooled tbh. Impressive though.
by Bjorn_Of_Iceland (July 9th - 2:30 AM) - Reply
E6600 redux :D
by SK-1 (July 9th - 3:21 AM) - Reply
When do you think they will be for sale?
by chron (July 9th - 3:24 AM) - Reply
by: InnocentCriminal
Pffft! LN - I'd be more excited if we saw 5GHz air or watercooled tbh. Impressive though.
yeah thats exactly what I was thinking. Although, there are a handfull of people thinking "Oh SWEET! i can DO that!"
by candle_86 (July 9th - 5:26 AM) - Reply
hell you need a single core P4 @ 4ghz to beat an Athlon 64 3200 @ 2ghz and well you need an x2 6400 3.2 to tie an E6550 so given the math kinda talking single cores of course here for logics sake 8.7 Pentium4 would equate rougly to a core2 @ 6ghz even if the core2 was in single core mode
by hayder.master (July 9th - 7:31 AM) - Reply
that is below q6600 away , new best game chooser
by Darkrealms (July 9th - 4:52 PM) - Reply
by: chron
[QUOTE=InnocentCriminal;876215]Pffft! LN - I'd be more excited if we saw 5GHz air or watercooled tbh. Impressive though.
yeah thats exactly what I was thinking. Although, there are a handfull of people thinking "Oh SWEET! i can DO that!"[/QUOTE]
My office has it ; ) So it can't be that uncommon.
Still I'll agree its "cheating". I'd be happy with a stable 4-4.5ghz on air : )
by ..'Ant'.. (July 10th - 6:16 AM) - Reply
WoW amazing. First time ever I see 6Ghz of an OC. :eek:
by InnocentCriminal (July 10th - 11:53 AM) - Reply
by: Grings
My 8400 is running at 8ghz...




...Using the dodgy Ebayer clock calculation technique ;)
:roll:

That's so freaking true!

Really grinds my gears when I look at a CPU on eBay and they say it's a 4GHz AthlonXP 64 or something equally as retarded! :mad:
by DaedalusHelios (July 10th - 12:35 PM) - Reply
by: eidairaman1
a core 2 at 6 GHz easily outpaces a 8GHz P4.
I am sure an average C2D at 2.4Ghz easily outpaces a P4 at 8Ghz.

Much more is done per clock cycle. ;)


by: candle_86
hell you need a single core P4 @ 4ghz to beat an Athlon 64 3200 @ 2ghz and well you need an x2 6400 3.2 to tie an E6550 so given the math kinda talking single cores of course here for logics sake 8.7 Pentium4 would equate rougly to a core2 @ 6ghz even if the core2 was in single core mode
With the caches on the Wolfdales, more gets done per clock cycle on an C2D than a X2 AMD. ;) If I am mistaken show me charts. :D
26 to 42 of 42 | Go to Page 1 2    Previous | Next
Post your own comment
4582 Users online, 3.33 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
New Forum Posts
13:02 by adam99leit
Project Cosmos S (10)
13:01 by imperialreign
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat Benchmark! (44)
13:00 by Triprift
LGA1156 i7 build: Opinions? (8)
12:58 by farlex85
Itching to Upgrade (37)
12:47 by hyena
Can't install GFX drivers... (0)
12:43 by pantherx12
>>> The Left 4 Dead *2* Clubhouse! (336)
Last Articles

Popular Articles