Tuesday, August 12th 2008

oZone3D.Net PhysX FluidMark v1.0.0 Benchmark Released

Now that the PhysX engine is a lot closer to every NVIDIA owner, new benchmarks designed to test these physics capabilities are unavoidable. First among many are the developers at oZone3D, releasing their first version of FluidMark, a physics benchmark based on NVIDIA's PhysX engine that measures the physics processing capabilities of CPUs, Ageia cards and OpenGL 2.0 compliant graphics card like NVIDIA GeForce 5/6/7/8/9/GTX200 (and higher), AMD/ATI Radeon 9600+, 1k/2k/3k/4k (and higher) or a S3 Graphics Chrome 400 series with the latest graphics drivers. This benchmark performs a fluid simulation by imitating the renderering of lava. Real physics parameters such as viscosity are used. SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) algorithm is enabled to increase the realism of the simulation. To test the FluidMark v1.0.0 please click here.Source: oZone3D.Net
Add your own comment

28 Comments on oZone3D.Net PhysX FluidMark v1.0.0 Benchmark Released

#1
Darkrealms
Can someone with PhysX check this out. It won't do anything unless the driver is installed??
Error: PhysX Engin initialization failed. Verify your PhysX Driver.
Posted on Reply
#2
Richieb0y
its good but i dont think it stress the GPU(cuda) much

but the nvidia powerpack demos are cool and everthing runs fluid on the physx part

does some1 know any good full physx game dont give me UT3 b/c i have it on xbox and there arent many physx there
Posted on Reply
#3
3xploit
I get a black screen and nothing happens. Do I have to do something to start the benchmark?
Posted on Reply
#4
KieranD
i get a black screen to then it finishes and its as if nothing happened
Posted on Reply
#5
3xploit
by: KieranD
i get a black screen to then it finishes and its as if nothing happened
how long did it take to finish and did you get a score?
Posted on Reply
#7
p_o_s_pc
F@H&WCG addict
it worked for me and i think it looked kinda cool.
Posted on Reply
#8
3xploit
does cpu count in this benchmark?
Posted on Reply
#9
p_o_s_pc
F@H&WCG addict
by: 3xploit
does cpu count in this benchmark?
i have no idea. I overclocked the GPU and got about 700 higher i will try clocking the CPU and see what it does.
Posted on Reply
#10
p_o_s_pc
F@H&WCG addict
by: 3xploit
does cpu count in this benchmark?
CPU does affect the score. so yes cpu does count. I have 2 SS below one of stock CPU and stock GPU, the other OC CPU stock GPU

Stock CPU


OC CPU
Posted on Reply
#13
SpookyWillow
no idea, if someone knows how i will gladly run it again :D
Posted on Reply
#14
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
I just get a black screen also.
Posted on Reply
#16
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Oddly, I still get a result even with just a black screen.
Posted on Reply
#17
Scrizz
w00t time to go out and buy a S3 graphics card! :laugh: :wtf: :shadedshu :confused: :cry: :D
Posted on Reply
#18
KieranD
1993 is what i got and that seems majorly low

i just decreased the resolution to a smaller size and it worked
Posted on Reply
#19
p_o_s_pc
F@H&WCG addict
by: KieranD
1993 is what i got and that seems majorly low

i just decreased the resolution to a smaller size and it worked
do you have physx installed for your card?
Posted on Reply
#20
KieranD
8800gt and i had the latest drivers and physx from that pack
Posted on Reply
#21
p_o_s_pc
F@H&WCG addict
by: KieranD
8800gt and i had the latest drivers and physx from that pack
you should have been getting around 5k or more. Also did you physX enabled?
Posted on Reply
#22
Kursah
Under Vista x64 I ran it, it was a black screen...when it was done, it said my rig (see sys specs), with my GTX260 OC'd could only muster 2.2k lol. I went to the score submission list on the Ozone site, 260's are around the 10k-12k region, the few that submitted that is...mine is OC'd to 702/1512 GPU/Shaders and 1200 Memory, I have more room, and I may back down...just wanted to see what I'd get lol...hopefully they get it x64 compatable soon!

:toast:
Posted on Reply
#23
thebeephaha
Still can't get it to not be a black screen but this is my score:

Posted on Reply
#24
Kursah
LoL! Well the reason I got 2.2K was due to the fact I had the GPU F@H client running lol! I can game fine w/it on...at least most of my games. So I always forget it's on!

But I got quite a bit better w/it turned off: 7405

Still not what I'm seeing GTX's scoring, but the score boards are probably high OC's under good cooling too. I suppose I could OC further...but this'll be my only run until x64 is properly supported. Enjoy!

Posted on Reply
#25
Wile E
Power User
by: Richieb0y
its good but i dont think it stress the GPU(cuda) much

but the nvidia powerpack demos are cool and everthing runs fluid on the physx part

does some1 know any good full physx game dont give me UT3 b/c i have it on xbox and there arent many physx there
Your UT3 on 360 has nothing to do with this. You have to download the mod for PC. It makes a noticeable difference with Physx enabled.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment