2424 Users online, 3.64 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
New Forum Posts
05:02 by OnBoard
Nvidia Gtx 295 (16)
04:57 by Nelson2011
[WTB][US] 3850 (5)
04:55 by OzzmanFloyd120
[FS/FT][US] Ozz's box of tricks! (80)
04:55 by stinger608
[FT] FoxConn A7VMX-K (2)
04:55 by OnBoard
The GTX 295 Preview (59)
04:54 by steelkane
EnergyFX's Thermaltake Soprano RS build (94)
04:51 by Xazax
[WTB][US] Cheap Intel 775 CPU (1)
04:51 by masbuskado
The XICLE (EvO+) [Build from Scratch (14)



Last Articles


Popular Articles
Wednesday, August 20 2008
Motherboard vendors are preparing rigorously for catering to the market that the upcoming Intel Core i7 series processors generate. The processors are based on a new 1366-pin land grid array (LGA-1366) socket and would require you to purchase a compatible motherboard. ASUS had recently revealed that it would be in a position to make its LGA-1366 offerings available by launch-day of the Core i7. Gigabyte is getting ready with its high-end offering, the GA-X58-EXTREME, TweakTown caught more than just a glimpse of it.



The board's a looker. Gigabyte maintained its signature colour scheme. Over to the north, you can see the new LGA-1366 socket. Gigabyte sought to provide active cooling to the northbridge with a water-block. It uses four PCI-Express slots arranged in a manner similar to that on the MA-790FX-DQ6. The board supports Tri-Channel DDR3 memory. Gigabyte could carve-out a value model, the GA-X58-DS4 out of this board design, presumably by blanking or reducing the orange PCI-Express x16 (electrical x8) slots, and the chipset and VRM cooling. The board in the picture is a non-functional sample.



Source: TweakTown
posted by btarunr - 12:00 AM |  Related News

User comments
by AddSub (August 20th - 2:45 PM) - Reply
Not a fan of Gigabyte or their products, but the board does look decent. Very neat component arrangement. Although, if I were ever thinking of switching over to the Nehalem architecture, then I would look for something from nVidia for my chipset needs. I'm old fashioned that way I guess and Intel has never been enthusiast friendly, especially when it comes to their chipsets, which is something people forget all the time. They just happen to have overall faster CPUs at this moment.

I never buy components when they are in their first generation or revision. I'm speaking not only about the motherboard which itself is sporting a brand new CPU platform, but the new CPU architecture as well. We can probably expect a Nehalem refresh within 6 to 8 months with possible bug-fixes and many other improvements and you can be sure that these early motherboards will have issues of varying severity with any future refreshes.
by flashstar (August 20th - 3:08 PM) - Reply
Is it just me or is that first pci-e slot blocked by the north bridge heat sink?

I hope that they fix it before releasing the final revision.
by yogurt_21 (August 20th - 3:45 PM) - Reply
pcie slot arangements aren't dual slot card friendly and definetly not practical for quadfire
by trt740 (August 20th - 3:48 PM) - Reply
nice too see but man are these chips gonna be overkill and boy do I like overkill
by [I.R.A]_FBi (August 20th - 3:48 PM) - Reply
addswub? what do u mean by "enthusiast friendly??
by qwerty_lesh (August 20th - 4:24 PM) - Reply
single slot gfx cards will fit in that board for quadfire no problem, but fat chance chucking an x2 or whatever which needs better cooling (4 in quadfire isnt gonna happen with that little space), aside from that though unlike other posters, im pretty happy with gigabyte boards, provided you pick the right revision, some they seem to cheap out on compared then others, and also the right series of board, (flagship ds4/ds5 is my favorite). can anyone confirm if the x58-extreme uses the realtek ethernet chipset? i wish they would resume using marvell for there premium motherboards, their so much more reliable over the realtek (known as database killers). id pick one over an asus, even if the colours are a train wreck on the gigabyte boards. lol
by Viscarious (August 20th - 4:38 PM) - Reply
Looks like a bag of skittles.
by PCpraiser100 (August 20th - 6:14 PM) - Reply
They have to carve out a value model. DDR2 is still a superstar for the enthusiast. I wonder about the BIOS.
by csendesmark (August 20th - 7:23 PM) - Reply
this board has support Tri-channel DDR3 + PCI-e 2.0 + ?USB 3.0?
why has floppy and ide connectors??? :D
at least, no COM + LPT ports to waste space on I/O shield
by VIPER (August 20th - 9:00 PM) - Reply
What else should they put instead of the FDD or IDE?
by csendesmark (August 20th - 10:23 PM) - Reply
by: VIPER;937703
What else should they put instead of the FDD or IDE?
more usb or sata or both :toast:
by ..'Ant'.. (August 21st - 1:14 AM) - Reply
by: Viscarious;937351
Looks like a bag of skittles.
Haha yeah it does but you can't go wrong with Gigabyte their good alright. Yes they look ugly but their good. :D
by Scrizz (August 21st - 1:36 AM) - Reply
Gigabyte's treated me well: I'm happy.
can't wait to get my hands on one of 'em
by VIPER (August 21st - 5:30 AM) - Reply
by: csendesmark;937846
more usb or sata or both :toast:
Well, you have a point! I will suggest them this, you are right.
by PP Mguire (August 21st - 6:14 AM) - Reply
Am i the only one that thinks the placement of everything on this board is crap? I mean seriously, 4 16x slots all together?
by VIPER (August 21st - 6:15 AM) - Reply
Relax, I worked with (and for) them a lot, you can easily install there 4 x 4850.
by Wile E (August 21st - 8:08 AM) - Reply
That is a terrible gfx layout. Even my Maze5 gpu block takes up slightly more than 1 slot. That layout is about useless for anyone considering more than 2 high end cards.
by VIPER (August 21st - 8:13 AM) - Reply
Guys, is just Rev. 0.1. This means is no way final! And all what you write here is read in HQ (trust me on this). And they usually take note of user's ideas.

Damn, I still talk as I am still their employee :D
by ktr (August 21st - 8:17 AM) - Reply
I wonder when the ATX layout will be retired for a new standard layout. It seems that ATX is reaching its peak.
by Wile E (August 21st - 8:29 AM) - Reply
by: ktr;938618
I wonder when the ATX layout will be retired for a new standard layout. It seems that ATX is reaching its peak.
That's what E-ATX is for. :D
by ktr (August 21st - 8:48 AM) - Reply
by: Wile E;938629
That's what E-ATX is for. :D
Your probably right. I have read some where that usb3.0 requires a shit load of pcb layers.
by hayder.master (August 21st - 8:57 AM) - Reply
gigabyte do great's mobo's but im thinking abou quad crossfire of hd 4870x2 how can put it in this sticking pci-e slot , maybe mobo more big in real not look clear in the picture and there is enough space between pci-e slot's but the 4870x2 still long card i think it is go over south bridge that's mean more heat for SB , so gigabyte must thinking about this
by REVHEAD (August 21st - 10:03 AM) - Reply
by: hayder.master;938661
gigabyte do great's mobo's but im thinking abou quad crossfire of hd 4870x2 how can put it in this sticking pci-e slot , maybe mobo more big in real not look clear in the picture and there is enough space between pci-e slot's but the 4870x2 still long card i think it is go over south bridge that's mean more heat for SB , so gigabyte must thinking about this

South bridge wont heat up much it will be fine, as for quad 4870x2? are you serious?

For one the PCIE lanes wont support the badwidth needed for 4 x2 cards, but neither will the drivers, and the PCIE spacing for that matter.
You can either run 4 x4850s, 4x 3850s, 2x 3870s, 2x 3870x2s, 2x 4870s, 2x4870sX2.

There are not enough PCIE lanes to do any other configs, even if there was the CPU would be so shit ass slow for 8 gpu cores to even get any performance from them.
by Wile E (August 21st - 10:05 AM) - Reply
by: REVHEAD;938707
South bridge wont heat up much it will be fine, as for quad 4870x2? are you serious?

For one the PCIE lanes wont support the badwidth needed for 4 x2 cards, but neither will the drivers, and the PCIE spacing for that matter.
You can either run 4 x4850s, 4x 3850s, 2x 3870s, 2x 3870x2s, 2x 4870s, 2x4870sX2.

There are not enough PCIE lanes to do any other configs, even if there was the CPU would be so shit ass slow for 8 gpu cores to even get any performance from them.
What about 3x4870 configs? The chipset should have plenty of bandwidth for that, yet it's not a possibility with this layout.

I think they definitely need to go back to the layout drawing board.
by REVHEAD (August 21st - 10:11 AM) - Reply
Yes sorry Wile E , I forgot about Tri Fire.
by btarunr (August 21st - 10:58 AM) - Reply
by: Wile E;938629
That's what E-ATX is for. :D
I heard about taller motherboards, not broader ones. E-ATX is broad, not tall. Remember that Foxconn X48 'tall' board? It fits into Full ATX >7 expansion slot cases.
by Wile E (August 21st - 11:12 AM) - Reply
by: btarunr;938738
I heard about taller motherboards, not broader ones. E-ATX is broad, not tall. Remember that Foxconn X48 'tall' board? It fits into Full ATX >7 expansion slot cases.


Oh yeah. Forgot about that. I think they should move to that for some enthusiast products. I think 10 slots would be nice.
by mab1376 (August 21st - 2:52 PM) - Reply
Looks like a good candidate for my new motherboard, i'll probably end up going with an Asus variant though.
by Morgoth (August 21st - 5:05 PM) - Reply
still any news from abit x58 board?
by PP Mguire (August 21st - 5:47 PM) - Reply

Guys, is just Rev. 0.1. This means is no way final! And all what you write here is read in HQ (trust me on this). And they usually take note of user's ideas.

Damn, I still talk as I am still their employee
Ah oh hi Gigabyte.
Seriously 4 4850s? With a stock cooler youd be able to heat up a 2 story house :D
by VIPER (August 21st - 7:30 PM) - Reply
I guess you know you can lower that temperature :P And, as somebody else said above, there are several different set-ups possible. Anyways, I am really curious how many people will actually use 4 x VGA Cards... Really, really curious...
by J-Man (August 21st - 7:36 PM) - Reply
Don't like Gigabyte products much, I'll go for a x58 ASUS board.
Post your comment