2241 Users online, 9.99 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
New Forum Posts
03:50 by DonInKansas
What should I ask for? (3)
03:50 by [I.R.A]_FBi
Using OLD cards (7)
03:46 by Live OR Die
COD5 Profile lost (5)
03:45 by WarEagleAU
These any good? (8)
03:44 by Hardware_Mark1
Mudo's CM 690 mod (7)
03:43 by _jM
New ASUS P5Q PRO OCing help.. (46)
03:41 by WarEagleAU
My CM HAF 932 Came Today!!!! (0)
03:41 by cdawall
Who has a B2 Phenom that overclocks? (16)



Last Articles


Popular Articles
Saturday, August 30 2008
Thermalright is releasing a variant of the HR-03 VGA cooling kit that supports the GeForce GTX 200 series graphics cards called the HR-03 GTX. The kit consists of the main heatsink unit, heatsinks over the memory, a heatsink for the card's VRM area and a heatsink over the NVIO2 processor. The main GPU heatsink is essentially the same as the HR-03 except for modifications of the portion that makes contact with the GPU and the heatpipe configuration. Although the HR-03 series kits were meant to provide silent cooling to graphics cards, the manufacturers of this cooler insist you install an additional fan using provided retention clips.



Source: Hardspell
posted by btarunr - 12:00 AM |  Related News

User comments
by fitseries3 (August 30th - 3:34 PM) - Reply
Weird.




i have never understood why anyone would want to use a cooler so damn big that you cant put another card next to it. what if you wanted to run tri-sli?
by btarunr (August 30th - 3:36 PM) - Reply
What's more weird, the original purpose of HR-03 (to provide silent cooling) is defeated, with the manufacturer telling you should add a fan.
by fitseries3 (August 30th - 3:39 PM) - Reply
by: btarunr;953070
What's more weird, the original purpose of HR-03 (to provide silent cooling) is defeated, with the manufacturer telling you should add a fan.
and with the fan.... forget about having anything else in your pci/pcie slots.
by AddSub (August 30th - 3:44 PM) - Reply
Dosen't look too special. Now let's wait and see what Thermaltake and the rest of them come up with.
by trt740 (August 30th - 4:06 PM) - Reply
by: btarunr;953070
What's more weird, the original purpose of HR-03 (to provide silent cooling) is defeated, with the manufacturer telling you should add a fan.
They were never ment to be passive , silent yes, passive no, and always a fan was recommended, there are no vga coolers that even come close to thermalrights( accept Arctic cooler newer ones). They are as close to water as you can get on air. I have owned almost all of their coolers VGA or otherwise, and they usually drop load temps near 40c, if you want to overclock a 280gtx this is the cooler , and I bet no other cooler companys will even attempt this.
by kid41212003 (August 30th - 4:08 PM) - Reply
I thought you can "turn" the heatsink around?
by oli_ramsay (August 30th - 4:08 PM) - Reply
Is it me or does the VRM sink look like a cheese grater?
by fitseries3 (August 30th - 4:10 PM) - Reply
by: oli_ramsay;953096
Is it me or does the VRM sink look like a cheese grater?


it's so if your at a lan party and you need some grated cheese for your taco you can grate it up... if you have cheese.
by rampage (August 30th - 4:10 PM) - Reply
its the same with the Thermalright's HR-03 pluss on my old 8800gtx i couldnt use any other slot on my entire mobo (micro atx), quite often if you want better cooling there is a price to pay either $$$ or room inside the case, and its quite often both

also dont forget when removing the stock cooler on the 200 series you quite often break the little tabs holding the cooler on voiding your warranty (thats the main reaon why i havent changed the cooler on mine)

one other thing i have fond with my gtx280 is that overclocking it gives me little benefit in games and benchmarks (it is cpu limited EG: 4.25 ghz dual core gave me an extra 4000 pts in 3dm 05 over a quad at 3.2) so the only reason i can see to go this would be for a cooler quieter gpu and not for OCing
by trt740 (August 30th - 4:13 PM) - Reply
by: rampage;953099
its the same with the Thermalright's HR-03 pluss on my old 8800gtx i couldnt use any other slot on my entire mobo (micro atx), quite often if you want better cooling there is a price to pay either $$$ or room inside the case, and its quite often both

also dont forget when removing the stock cooler on the 200 series you quite often break the little tabs holding the cooler on voiding your warranty (thats the main reaon why i havent changed the cooler on mine)

one other thing i have fond with my gtx280 is that overclocking it gives me little benefit in games and benchmarks (it is cpu limited EG: 4.25 ghz dual core gave me an extra 4000 pts in 3dm 05 over a quad at 3.2) so the only reason i can see to go this would be for a cooler quieter gpu
thats because your cpu is only at 3.2ghz at even 3.6ghz you would see a giant jumps. With my old Qx9650 (fits has now) your score would jump by thousands when overclocking a 280.
by fitseries3 (August 30th - 4:13 PM) - Reply
we need a single slot cooler that cools SO well that the GPU is 1-2c above room temp. it would be a F*&^in miracle if they make that though.
by trt740 (August 30th - 4:13 PM) - Reply
by: kid41212003;953095
I thought you can "turn" the heatsink around?
you might still be able I assumed you couldn't.
by fitseries3 (August 30th - 4:15 PM) - Reply
by: trt740;953103
thats because your cpu is only at 3.2ghz at even 3.6ghz you would see a giant jumps. With my old Qx9650 (fits has now) your score would jump by thousands when overclocking a 280.
yup.... OC the vid cards 20mhz on the core and you get about 1000-1200pts higher with the qx9650 at 4.5ghz

hell... from 4.4ghz to 4.5ghz i saw 1480pts somehow.
by rampage (August 30th - 4:18 PM) - Reply
by: trt740;953103
thats because your cpu is only at 3.2ghz at even 3.6ghz you would see a giant jumps. With my old Qx9650 (fits has now) your score would jump by thousands when overclocking a 280.
the largest gain i have seen was with the 4.25 ghz cpu and a highly overclocked gpu was 3>5 %(aprox), im just saying i had a larger gain from a faster cpu then gpu, in my belief there cpu limited

but back to the main topic, yeah i think the cooler would make a nice improvement over the stock one temp wise
by trt740 (August 30th - 4:25 PM) - Reply
by: rampage;953113
the largest gain i have seen was with the 4.25 ghz cpu and a highly overclocked gpu was 3>5 %(aprox), im just saying i had a larger gain from a faster cpu then gpu, in my belief there cpu limited

but back to the main topic, yeah i think the cooler would make a nice improvement over the stock one temp wise
and I bet it will go alot higher with that cooler.
by btarunr (August 30th - 4:30 PM) - Reply
by: trt740;953091
They were never ment to be passive , silent yes, passive no, and always a fan was recommended, there are no vga coolers that even come close to thermalrights( accept Arctic cooler newer ones). They are as close to water as you can get on air. I have owned almost all of their coolers VGA or otherwise, and they usually drop load temps near 40c, if you want to overclock a 280gtx this is the cooler , and I bet no other cooler companys will even attempt this.
A fan was always recommended but never part of the requirements. Thermalright says you need a fan at all costs.
by trt740 (August 30th - 4:34 PM) - Reply
by: btarunr;953130
A fan was always recommended but never part of the requirements. Thermalright says you need a fan at all costs.
yes on a GTX but not on all the prior models.
by WarEagleAU (August 30th - 4:35 PM) - Reply
It does look like a cheese grater and the thing is massive. For those wanting to keep a single card solution with awesome cooling, not much around to beat this beast.
by kid41212003 (August 30th - 5:03 PM) - Reply
by: trt740;953106
you might still be able I assumed you couldn't.

:wtf:
If you can't turn this heatsink around, It's suck. I mean, the first impression when I look at this design is you can turn this around, and make sandwich, I thought this why the heatsink look like that...
by blobster21 (August 30th - 5:30 PM) - Reply
i've got two of these babies cooling 2 HD4870 crossfired, with no additional fans, they works great

by kid41212003 (August 30th - 5:34 PM) - Reply
Yes! You can turn it! :D
by fitseries3 (August 30th - 5:34 PM) - Reply
by: blobster21;953174
i've got two of these babies cooling 2 HD4870 crossfired, with no additional fans, they works great


that looks sick! almost like lungs of the beast.
by PP Mguire (August 30th - 5:37 PM) - Reply

not much around to beat this beast.
Watercooling
by trt740 (August 30th - 5:38 PM) - Reply
by: blobster21;953174
i've got two of these babies cooling 2 HD4870 crossfired, with no additional fans, they works great


thermalright is the cooling god
by trt740 (August 30th - 5:39 PM) - Reply
by: PP Mguire;953184
Watercooling
um not really it's close, and it has alot less pain in the ass factor.
by PP Mguire (August 30th - 5:43 PM) - Reply
Full card blocks with trifan rad means you can still have a single slot solution and cool better than air.
by trt740 (August 30th - 5:45 PM) - Reply
by: PP Mguire;953192
Full card blocks with trifan rad means you can still have a single slot solution and cool better than air.
not all water cooling is better than these thermalrights
by blobster21 (August 30th - 5:52 PM) - Reply
since it's not totally off topic, please find enclosed more photos of these heatsinks in a dual configuration :









A radial 12 cm fan blowing across the heatpipes add some serious security margin for any further overclock...

hope this help :)
by alexp999 (August 30th - 6:39 PM) - Reply
Dont they have anything for the back Ram chips with this? Or are you just supposed to leave the stock metal plate in place. :confused:
by tkpenalty (August 31st - 1:07 AM) - Reply
by: blobster21;953198
since it's not totally off topic, please find enclosed more photos of these heatsinks in a dual configuration :









A radial 12 cm fan blowing across the heatpipes add some serious security margin for any further overclock...

hope this help :)
U know you can route that 8 pin/4pin 12v ATX wire under the GPUs instead of over everything....?
by REVHEAD (August 31st - 3:46 AM) - Reply
by: tkpenalty;953663
U know you can route that 8 pin/4pin 12v ATX wire under the GPUs instead of over everything....?
Umm I dont think he is stupud, why bother its only ęsthetic anyway, looks like he has better things on his mind..
by blobster21 (August 31st - 7:06 AM) - Reply
by: tkpenalty;953663
U know you can route that 8 pin/4pin 12v ATX wire under the GPUs instead of over everything....?
yup, but the cable you're talking about is definately too short to do that, this is the only way to reach the 4pins molex hidden behind the noctua HS, i wish there was a workaround though.
by OnBoard (August 31st - 8:43 AM) - Reply
There are extension wires for the 4pin/8pin 12v thingy, would make it even more sexy looking :)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812198006
by Wile E (August 31st - 9:13 AM) - Reply
by: PP Mguire;953192
Full card blocks with trifan rad means you can still have a single slot solution and cool better than air.
Full card blocks actually perform worse than universal blocks. They dump the heat from the mem and vregs into the loop, lowering your gpu clock. Sure, you might be able to squeeze some extra out of the mem, but the gpu speed is infinitely more important that the mem speed.

As for a point of reference in the water vs air debate, my card loop consists of a Maze5 GPU block, MCP-350 Pump, MicroRes, and a Swiftech MCR-120 120mm rad with a Silverstone FM-121 fan, all with 3/8" fittings. In a room temp of 21C, I reach a temp of 42C running Furmark, with a vGPU of 1.7V. At stock volts, it peaks at 33C.
by eidairaman1 (August 31st - 9:17 AM) - Reply
thats why you want a separate memblock and a separate GPU Block.
by hayder.master (August 31st - 9:35 AM) - Reply
cool , looking well
by hayder.master (August 31st - 9:38 AM) - Reply
by: blobster21;953198
since it's not totally off topic, please find enclosed more photos of these heatsinks in a dual configuration :









A radial 12 cm fan blowing across the heatpipes add some serious security margin for any further overclock...

hope this help :)


you put your staff in dell system case right , i know it cuz i see the mobo is upside down , i have two dell case too im thinking about mod it , nothing better than dell cases but only problem is main case door the right side that is mean when you put other mobo everything be inverse
by Wile E (August 31st - 9:40 AM) - Reply
by: hayder.master;954181
you put your staff in dell system case right , i know it cuz i see the mobo is upside down , i have two dell case too im thinking about mod it
Nope, that's a CM Stacker 830 or 832. You can reverse mount the mobo tray in those. I ran mine that way for quite a while.
by blobster21 (August 31st - 3:01 PM) - Reply
Wile E is right, it's written down on my specs ;)
by trt740 (August 31st - 3:04 PM) - Reply
by: hayder.master;954181
you put your staff in dell system case right , i know it cuz i see the mobo is upside down , i have two dell case too im thinking about mod it , nothing better than dell cases but only problem is main case door the right side that is mean when you put other mobo everything be inverse
who cares anyways it looks great. :D:roll:
by PP Mguire (August 31st - 4:36 PM) - Reply

Sure, you might be able to squeeze some extra out of the mem, but the gpu speed is infinitely more important that the mem speed.
On my card ive had more benefiet from clocking my memory high. Its probably the opposite to you because you have alot more mem than me. So really it all depends on the card. My old 7950GT got more of a boost from clocking the core than ram cause it had 512mb.
by Wile E (September 1st - 4:36 AM) - Reply
by: PP Mguire;954472
On my card ive had more benefiet from clocking my memory high. Its probably the opposite to you because you have alot more mem than me. So really it all depends on the card. My old 7950GT got more of a boost from clocking the core than ram cause it had 512mb.


No, even with your card, I guaranty that a 50Mhz core OC will score higher than a 50Mhz mem clock. Once you pass a certain point on the mem on that card, it is no longer a bottleneck. That point can generally be achieved without h2o cooling. And even if it is a bottleneck, raising the core will still provide increases.
by PP Mguire (September 1st - 4:41 AM) - Reply
Its still better to keep everything nice and cool if your going that route. And, there is no difference between 700 and 750mhz core right now. When i cranked the ram from 950 to 1050 though there was a big improvement.
by Wile E (September 1st - 5:14 AM) - Reply
by: PP Mguire;955255
Its still better to keep everything nice and cool if your going that route. And, there is no difference between 700 and 750mhz core right now. When i cranked the ram from 950 to 1050 though there was a big improvement.


What did you use to verify that? No testing on any video card I have ever done, or that my teamate with the GSO's has done, shows any trend like that at all. The core always does more. My guess would be that you need a little more gpu vcore to run 750Mhz properly. That can make a huge difference, trust me. I can run 900Mhz in 3Dmark 06 at 1.55V, but I score much lower than when I run the same speed at 1.7V.

And my point about full coverage block is that you sacrifice gpu cooling for better ram cooling, when just making sure you have good airflow and ram sinks would do just as well in the ram clocking department as far as scores are concerned. Because all you need to do is ease the bottleneck. It doesn't take much to accomplish that.
by PP Mguire (September 1st - 5:26 AM) - Reply
Just playing games and watching the FPS. In high graphic games there wasnt as much of a dip when clocking my ram up but almost little or no difference when going from 700 to 750.
by Das Capitolin (September 2nd - 5:45 PM) - Reply
I don't follow their logic: spend a lot of time to remove the stock cooling from you GTX 280 and potentially void a warranty, then add a whole bunch of nickel (heat-retaining) heatpipe components to your video card, and then add a fan. Oh- by the way, we won't include a fan. Also- you've just used two additional slots.

You've just paid more, got less, and will likely void a warranty in the process. Goodie.
by kyle2020 (September 2nd - 5:49 PM) - Reply
id much prefer an AC Twin Turbo tbh. That or the t-rad ;)
Post your comment