Sunday, October 26 2008
According to industry observer DigiTimes, Intel would be giving its Montevina mobile computing platform an update, with the introduction of new processors and core logic (chipsets). The update, for the most part, revolves around the mid/high range products. Intel would be introducing Core 2 Duo models T9900 and P8800. The T9900 would be Intel's flagship mobile dual-core chip, with the P8800 leading the performance mainstream range.

Intel also plans new chipsets. The Intel GM47 Express would be the company's next high-end mobile chipset, and is slated for Q1, 2009. Intel will also launch GM43 and GS43 Express chipsets for entry-level notebook and small form-factor (SFF) PCs. In other news, it is also expected that the company gets ready to launch the GM55 (Mobile Ibex-Peak) chipset between July and August, 2009. GM55 would be Intel's Nehalem processor supportive chipset for the Auburndale dual-core and Clarksfield quad-core processors, with the platform itself being codenamed Calpella.

Source: DigiTimes
posted by btarunr - 12:03 PM |  Related News

User comments
by Hayder_Master (October 26th - 12:06 PM) - Reply
T9900 , any details about it
by btarunr (October 26th - 12:13 PM) - Reply
by: hayder.master
T9900 , any details about it
T9600 comes with 6 MB L2, 2.80 GHz clock (266 x 10.5), 1066 MHz FSB. Take steps of 133 MHz...T9700 at 2.93 (266 x 11), T9800 at 3.06 (266 x 11.5), T9900 3.20 (266 x 12).
by ShadowFold (October 26th - 12:32 PM) - Reply
Wow those look fast. Hope AMD gets a good new platform out to rival this. I know right now their mobile stuff is alot better than Intel's(or I think).
by Hayder_Master (October 26th - 12:50 PM) - Reply
by: btarunr
T9600 comes with 6 MB L2, 2.80 GHz clock (266 x 10.5), 1066 MHz FSB. Take steps of 133 MHz...T9700 at 2.93 (266 x 11), T9800 at 3.06 (266 x 11.5), T9900 3.20 (266 x 12).
wow , i can't imagine nootbook with 3.2GHZ and 1066 fsb with 8M cash
by FordGT90Concept (October 26th - 2:40 PM) - Reply
by: ShadowFold
Wow those look fast. Hope AMD gets a good new platform out to rival this. I know right now their mobile stuff is alot better than Intel's(or I think).

If memory serves, AMD is only better on the power consumption front and that's mostly because they have a smaller cache.
by PCpraiser100 (October 26th - 4:50 PM) - Reply
Yes! I hope 1366 Nehalem follows with it cause I wanna see some benchmarks with it in todays titles.
6230 Users online, 4.75 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
TechPowerUp on Facebook 
TechPowerUp on Google+ 
New Forum Posts
21:28 by Delta6326
Need help picking parts for gaming pc (2)
21:27 by catnipkiller
The AMD Phenom II OC'ers Club (14097)
21:15 by mrw1986
[FF] Pay it forward TPU (756)
21:13 by tilldeath
Bios update? (4)
21:03 by mudkip
TPU's GTX460 Club (508)
20:35 by Killer_Rubber_...
Easy Rhino's Minecraft Server Clubhouse! (768)
20:31 by sandyman
Using a 5450 for external displays. (2)
20:26 by Kevinheraiz
Battlefield 3 Clubhouse (11470)
Popular Reviews

Latest VGA Drivers

ATI Catalyst 12.1 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64

NVIDIA GeForce 285.58 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64