Saturday, November 15th 2008

Inno3D GeForce 9600 GSO+ Spotted

The entry of Radeon HD 4670 did disturb NVIDIA's position, in a segment touted to be one of the cash-cow segments for both NVIDIA and AMD. It is to counter the HD 4870 in its price-range (by easing production-costs), that NVIDIA released a refreshed GeForce 9600 GSO+. The die on the GPU reads "G94-201-B1", pointing that the GPU uses the 55nm silicon fab process (9600 GSO used G92). With the reduced transistor-count on the G94 core, manufacturing the chip becomes cheaper. The real change however, is that NVIDIA made some significant changes to its shader and memory domains, hence the use of G94 core.

The shader count has been reduced from 96 on the 9600 GSO, to 48. This, by disabling 16 shaders from the G94 core. The core is clocked at 650/1675 MHz (core/shader). The GPU is allowed to use the complete width of its memory bus: 256-bit GDDR3. The card features 512 MB of memory, clocked at 1800 MHz. The memory chips featured on the Inno3D card are made by Qimonda, and have a 1.2 ns latency. The card uses a simplistic circular cooler for the GPU. It is expected to be priced at US $87.
Source: Expreview
Add your own comment

35 Comments on Inno3D GeForce 9600 GSO+ Spotted

#26
Wile E
Power User
btarunrThe entry of Radeon HD 4670 did disturb NVIDIA's position, in a segment touted to be one of the cash-cow segments for both NVIDIA and AMD. It is to counter the HD 4870 in its price-range.....
Found a misprint, bta.

And the prospect of this card bores me. lol.
Posted on Reply
#27
theJesus
@Wile E: wow, I'm surprised nobody else caught that yet :laugh:
FudFighterjoy another crap nvidia card........ just wait, this will become the gt200gso soon :P
I think you mean GSO 200 :p
Posted on Reply
#28
Hayder_Master
DaMultaIMO the GSO is not that bad of a card....

These are single card scores......by dom





Note, these scores do not have the shader cut, but does not have the smaller die as the newer cards will. Going higher in speed might be possible with the newer GSO+.....
ohh, this is impressive overclock for 9600gso
Posted on Reply
#29
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
That is a non reference GSO palit card btw.....not the normal gso card.....
Posted on Reply
#30
Hayder_Master
great palit , and waht about cooler same stock cooler
Posted on Reply
#31
DOM
hayder.mastergreat palit , and waht about cooler same stock cooler
www.palit.biz/main/vgapro.php?id=664

thats the cooler they come with but that OC was on water, 900-2200-2250 is stable for gaming benching all day :D
Posted on Reply
#32
KainXS
hey dom, did you try putting a 8800gts 512 bios on your 8800gs yet, I put one on mine and it pumps out about 5 extra g/texels now in gpu-z for some reason

but 900/2250 is crazy
Posted on Reply
#33
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
retianing the full 16 ROPS and memory interface raises the bar for the low end.

48 sp's isn't much but definitely enough, not to mention being a 55nm part, with some disabled portions... this card should clock up sommin' fierce.
Posted on Reply
#34
DOM
KainXShey dom, did you try putting a 8800gts 512 bios on your 8800gs yet, I put one on mine and it pumps out about 5 extra g/texels now in gpu-z for some reason

but 900/2250 is crazy
mines a 9600 GSO ;)
Posted on Reply
#35
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
NVidia has to do something with all those defective G94 cores, though I really dislike the naming system, but nVidia's naming scheme has been messed up every since they released the G92 parts.

This is how I see nVidia's naming scheme should be:

8800GT(G80-96SP, what we know as the 8800GTS)
8800GTS(G80-112SP, what we know as the 8800GTS 112)
8800GTX(G80-128SP)
8800Ultra(G80-128SP)

8700GS(G94-48SP, what we know as the new 9600GSO+)
8700GT(G94-64SP, what we know as the 9600GT)
8850GS(G92-96SP, what we know as the 8800GS/9600GSO)
8850GT(G92-112SP, what we know as the 8800GT)
8850GTX(G92-128SP, what we know as the 8800GTS 512MB)
8850Ultra(G92-128SP, what we know as the 9800GTX)

9800GT(GT200-192SP, what we know as the GTX260)
9800GTS(GT200-216SP, what we know as the GTX260 216)
9800GTX(GT200-240SP, what we know as the GTX280)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 19th, 2024 16:56 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts