Friday, April 17th 2009

Core i5 Specifications and Prices Surface

Intel's next big thing in the making, the Core i5 series processors are nearing launch, which is reportedly delayed to October. The new processors replace the Core 2 Quad and Core 2 Duo series of processors, while leaving the high-end market for Core i7 to play with. These processors are based on the LGA 1156 socket, and are incompatible with Core i7 motherboards. Recent reports shed light on three models in the making to start the lineup, all of which are quad-core processors based on the Lynnfield core, built on the existing 45 nm process.

The common features of these processors include: four x86 processing cores with support for HyperThreading technology, an integrated dual-channel DDR3 memory controller specified to run DDR3-1066 and DDR3-1333 modules, 8 MB of L3 cache, and support for TurboBoost technology. The three models will come with core clock speeds of 2.66 GHz, 2.80 GHz, and 2.93 GHz. The three will be priced at US $196, $284, and $562 respectively. With the TurboBoost technology enabled, the clock speeds card be stepped up to 3.2, 3.46 and 3.6 GHz respectively, on the fly. Shortly after launching these processors, Intel may introduce the industry's first 32 nm processors. With these prices, the chips clearly intrude the price-domain of Core i7, though perhaps their lower platform costs could serve as deal-makers.
Sources: TechConnect Magazine, HKEPC
Add your own comment

61 Comments on Core i5 Specifications and Prices Surface

#51
Studabaker
I also think that just under $200 is OK for a brand new processor with all this technology and power behind it. Also figure maybe the motherboards will cost $150 and under instead of $300 and under.
Posted on Reply
#52
N4cot1c
HolyCow02wow those prices are ridiculous. Why even think of them when you can get a 3.2GHz PII (955) for around $280? What a joke
These compete with the PII
Posted on Reply
#53
$ReaPeR$
if intel continues this way i think that my next rig will have an AMD cpu. imo the 2 sockets idea its not good for upgrades..i canot see where they are headed with this..
Posted on Reply
#54
Unregistered
ye i dont like the 2 socket types doubt it was really all that nessary :s, im going i7 anyways...
Posted on Edit | Reply
#55
MilkyWay
i7 seems a little dear my phenom 2 rig was cheap

i like a cheap system, thats the main factor that stopped me going i7

its stupid anyway with new i7 on the way
Posted on Reply
#56
n-ster
I say let's not argue about the i5 before we see it's performance ;)
Posted on Reply
#57
$ReaPeR$
i agree with you n-ster but i also fail to see the logic behind the two socket design except for the the more cash gains for intel from the upgrades.. and that i think is very sneaky and low.. and sadly i know that all companies do it.
Posted on Reply
#58
FryingWeesel
they need 2 sockets in this case, i7's extra pins are for memory communication remmber dual channel vs tri channel, just like amd back in the 754 vs 939 days, the extra pins on the 939 chip where to support dual chan memory.

Intel wants to force enthusiasts to buy their enthusiast platform that they sell at a HIGH preimum, and they do want to block/hamper clocking as much as possible, because it takes away from their profits in their eyes, I mean if a person couldnt overclock that "cheap" cpu to match the perf of their qx9770 intel would sell more qx9770's wouldnt they? (this is rich people logic, not real world, we dont all got thousands to spend on a proc logic)

this dosnt intrest me, AMD's phenomII is plenty for my next upgrade, and this 6000+ is holding me fine for now.

and amd's bulldozer should be quite a change in the market once its ready for market, so i see no VALUE in my moving to intel.

I bought a ta770(biostar board) quite some time back, due to bios updates i can take ANY am2, am2+ or am3 cpu thats avalable, my buddys who went intel payed more, and are now boned because intels EOL'd 775..........

sometimes its good to be content with what you have ;)
Posted on Reply
#59
Hayder_Master
look old core 2 duo more efficient to me , specially the price
Posted on Reply
#60
Tatty_Two
Gone Fishing
hayder.masterlook old core 2 duo more efficient to me , specially the price
the I7 920 is much cheaper than a Q9650 and as cheap as a Q9550, it's the motherboard that is the real cost but we are now seeing some pretty overclockable "budget" boards so things are getting better, the cost difference between PII and i7 is narrowing at least.
Posted on Reply
#61
n-ster
a good i7 mobo these days is about 225$ (DFI DK)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 25th, 2024 18:59 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts