Wednesday, July 22 2009
Nearly six weeks into the introduction of the Athlon II X2 250, AMD added two new models in the series to choose from the Athlon II X2 240 and 245 are clocked at 2.80 GHz and 2.90 GHz respectively, and occupy two lower places in the series. The 240 has a bus multiplier of 14.0x 200 MHz, while 245 is a notch higher, at 14.5x 200 MHz. The chips are based on AMD's 45 nm Regor core, which is a monolithic dual-core, with two physical cores on a die, and no L3 cache. The L2 cache per core instead, has been increased to 1 MB, which makes it 2 MB of total external cache for the chip. It uses a lavish 4.0 GT/s HyperTransport 3.0 system interface, and comes in the AM3 socket package that supports DDR2 and DDR3 memory standards. The two will be out soon and will be priced around the US $65 mark.

posted by btarunr - 3:29 PM |  Related News

User comments
by newtekie1 (July 22nd - 3:37 PM) - Reply
Damn, I was hoping they would go up, not down...Hopefully a 260 is on the way.
by Semi-Lobster (July 22nd - 3:52 PM) - Reply
by: newtekie1
Damn, I was hoping they would go up, not down...Hopefully a 260 is on the way.
Maybe these will have a lower TDP? Breaking the 45W mark for dual-cores would be a dream come true for HTPC builders
by mdm-adph (July 22nd - 4:05 PM) - Reply
by: newtekie1
Damn, I was hoping they would go up, not down...Hopefully a 260 is on the way.
Cheaper is the only way to fight when your opponent is Intel.
by newtekie1 (July 22nd - 4:07 PM) - Reply
I'm pretty sure undervolting the 250 gets you pretty close already.

by: mdm-adph
Cheaper is the only way to fight when your opponent is Intel.
No, I'm pretty sure they have plenty of room to increase clock speeds to compete with some of the higher processors. The 250 is only a 65w processor after all...
by [I.R.A]_FBi (July 22nd - 5:39 PM) - Reply
monolithic dual-core


how is this an issue?
by mdm-adph (July 22nd - 6:24 PM) - Reply
by: newtekie1
I'm pretty sure undervolting the 250 gets you pretty close already.



No, I'm pretty sure they have plenty of room to increase clock speeds to compete with some of the higher processors. The 250 is only a 65w processor after all...


I'm sure they do, too. That's why, if they haven't, it's because they know it won't be worth their time and money to do so, and have obviously decided to compete on the lower cost market.

Unless you know better that their teams of financial planners and strategists. ;)

by: [I.R.A]_FBi
how is this an issue?


Is it because these chips will use a lot less power than just a crippled quad-core that's been turned into a dual?
by newtekie1 (July 22nd - 6:30 PM) - Reply
by: mdm-adph
I'm sure they do, too. That's why, if they haven't, it's because they know it won't be worth their time and money to do so, and have obviously decided to compete on the lower cost market.

Unless you know better that their teams of financial planners and strategists. ;)
At this point I think I just might...

As I don't see how competing at the higher profit margin areas would be a bad thing in any way.

Edit: Although, now that I look at it closer, releasing higher models would probably start to hurt the 550 sales, as the 250 and 550 perform pretty similarly already. Though I would still like to see a 260BE...

Edit2: The 245 is already at newegg for $66.99, putting it right there with the E5200.
by btarunr (July 22nd - 6:49 PM) - Reply
by: [I.R.A]_FBi
how is this an issue?
It's not a quad-core with failed/defective/disabled cores, in other words, there's nothing for you to unlock :)
by HalfAHertz (July 22nd - 7:49 PM) - Reply
Uh last time I checked the 5200 was trailing the 250

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3572&p=5
by newtekie1 (July 22nd - 8:00 PM) - Reply
by: HalfAHertz
Uh last time I checked the 5200 was trailing the 250

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3572&p=5
Your right, sorry. I was looking at this, but I think I had the numbers for the E6300 loaded, but had changed the drop down box to say E5200 and didn't hit the compare button again to get it to load. Thats what I get for jumping back and forth between too many tabs.:laugh:
by HalfAHertz (July 22nd - 9:12 PM) - Reply
Still you are right, they are close, and the 5200 does lead in some of the tests
by Wile E (July 22nd - 9:13 PM) - Reply
I wonder how they compare in terms of OCing?
by newtekie1 (July 22nd - 9:42 PM) - Reply
by: Wile E
I wonder how they compare in terms of OCing?
I don't know, I really want to get my hands on one of the Athlon II X2's to play with, but just can't afford it right now.
by HalfAHertz (July 22nd - 10:19 PM) - Reply
I have a weery feeling that the 5200 will out-clock it
by Wile E (July 22nd - 10:21 PM) - Reply
by: newtekie1
I don't know, I really want to get my hands on one of the Athlon II X2's to play with, but just can't afford it right now.
I really wish I had a newer AMD board that supports the newer cpus. I'm stuck with brisbanes and windsors.
by WarEagleAU (July 22nd - 10:28 PM) - Reply
wow, nice comparative numbers to the 5200. About time they put out something to compete.
by newtekie1 (July 22nd - 10:32 PM) - Reply
by: HalfAHertz
I have a weery feeling that the 5200 will out-clock it
I have the feeling also. I've been hearing 3.8-3.9GHz is about the max for the Athlon II, obviously extreme cooling can get it higher I'm sure.

I seem to want to say the E5200 maxes about at about the same, maybe even higher. For some reason I think 4.0GHz+ might be entirely possible with the E5200. And since the E5200 already comes close to matching the 250, once both are clocked roughly the same I think the E5200 will take it.
by Wile E (July 22nd - 10:57 PM) - Reply
by: newtekie1
I have the feeling also. I've been hearing 3.8-3.9GHz is about the max for the Athlon II, obviously extreme cooling can get it higher I'm sure.

I seem to want to say the E5200 maxes about at about the same, maybe even higher. For some reason I think 4.0GHz+ might be entirely possible with the E5200. And since the E5200 already comes close to matching the 250, once both are clocked roughly the same I think the E5200 will take it.
Well, from what I can tell, c2d still has the per clock advantage over these.
7127 Users online, 5.27 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
TechPowerUp on Facebook 
TechPowerUp on Google+ 
New Forum Posts
15:41 by Wrigleyvillain
The Official Elder Scrolls V : Skyrim Thread (4387)
15:39 by cadaveca
Monitor hook up blues (1)
15:39 by copenhagen69
[FS][US] Kenkickr's Cleaning House (107)
15:33 by copenhagen69
[FS/FT] Catnipkillers used goodies (181)
15:31 by copenhagen69
[FS/FT][US] [H]@RD5TUFF's stuff (847)
15:29 by copenhagen69
[FS/FT][US] Pops general store (163)
15:28 by GC_PaNzerFIN
Your PC ATM (19521)
15:27 by copenhagen69
[FS/FT][US] t_ski's gotta sell some stuff (729)
15:21 by Wrigleyvillain
Which GFX GTX580 3gb or HD 7950 3gb? (28)
Popular Reviews

Latest VGA Drivers

ATI Catalyst 12.1 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64

NVIDIA GeForce 285.58 WHQL

XP32 | XP64 | W7 32 | W7 64