PDA

View Full Version : gpuz reading wrong number of shaders?


caoder
Jul 30, 2010, 06:25 PM
i have 2 x gtx 260 65 nm one sc and one vanilla.. i believe they are both 192 shader models.. but gpuz always read the vanilla one as a 216 model, but the texture fill rate is rated as the 192 model. i dunno is it a bug or do i have a 216 model. and uses the bios 62.00.1A.00.0A. *shrug* not sure what to say about it. just want to make sure its 192 or 216.

DrPepper
Jul 30, 2010, 06:33 PM
I think that if its a 216 model it will have 55nm process so have a look and see if thats correct.

caoder
Jul 30, 2010, 06:33 PM
no there's both 65 and 55 216 earliest 216s were 65nm

DrPepper
Jul 30, 2010, 06:35 PM
no there's both 65 and 55 216 earliest 216s were 65nm

Right I was under the impression that the 55nm was 216 version. Well I don't think GPU-Z is reading it wrong but you could try taking out the one that is definately 192 and see if gpu-z still reads it as 216.

caoder
Jul 30, 2010, 06:43 PM
took out the one that's 192 and its still reading 216 .. i'll swap the other one back in..

this one is not marked as a 216 model is what bothers me..

caoder
Jul 30, 2010, 06:50 PM
192 sc version is running as a 192 .. its either a 216 model or.. gpuz isn't detecting correctly.

DrPepper
Jul 30, 2010, 06:52 PM
Could be a packaging mistake since a 192 and 216 are pretty much identical.

caoder
Jul 30, 2010, 06:59 PM
identical but back then it woulda been a pricey mistake for evga .. since the model number listed on back is also a 192 model.. *shrugs... so most likely evga error rather than a gpuz error?

DrPepper
Jul 30, 2010, 06:59 PM
identical but back then it woulda been a pricey mistake for evga .. since the model number listed on back is also a 192 model.. *shrugs... so most likely evga error rather than a gpuz error?

I'd think so. Maybe w1zzard would be more helpful than me though since he made it.

overclocking101
Jul 30, 2010, 07:32 PM
well gpu-z reads at a bios level if it were a 192 with 216 bios it would function properly sooo. I would think its a 216. but is the 216 in slot 1 or as the slave card?? because I know for a fact that if the 216 isnt the master card sli will scale improperly

caoder
Jul 30, 2010, 07:34 PM
was as a slave card, .. bios matched up with the bios label on the card. i'm not so sure about scaling.. (haven't had many issues gaming)

GoneTomorrow
Aug 9, 2010, 03:11 AM
EVGA often slips Core 216 cards into Core 192 packages and sells them as such based on supply and demand of the different versions. Sometimes you also get a Superclocked version in a stock clocked box. If you visit the EVGA forums you'll see this is quite common.