Post your Google Score..???

[trog100]

makes a change from post your futuremark one..

put your internet name in google and hit go..

i (trog100) get 474.. he he he.. and they are all me.. i need a life..


trog

[KennyT772]

Results 1 - 10 of about 810 for kennyt772.

well lets just say im famous...

[Solaris17]

Results 1 - 10 of about 705 for solaris17

pretty much..hmm my other names

Results 1 - 9 of about 11 for phoenix2red2000 (:()

Results 1 - 3 of 3 for loki00017 hahaha :laugh:


hurray me!

[Thermopylae_480]

164 :laugh:

[Thermopylae_480]

They are almost all for TPU.

[newmodder]

i got 1-10-176

[trog100]

Results 21 - 30 of about 4,020 for kennyt772. (0.33 seconds)

more famous than u think kenny.... he he he

not as famouse as this dude thow..

Results 1 - 10 of about 58,800,000 for elvis. (0.06 seconds)

kinda makes me wonder why i only get 400 and odd.. i must be good for several thousand forum posts over the last few years..

ahhh.. seems google comes up with different count on different days.. i wonder if its internet speed that governs it.. its double today than what it was yesterday..

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,080 for trog100. (0.57 seconds)

and yesterday elvis only got 23 million.. he he he

trog

[W1zzard]

Results 1 - 30 of about 28,400 for w1zzard. (0.33 seconds)

i win :D

[Steevo]

It only counts for correct hits on your name? Or just total hits?

[INSTG8R]

er....
Results 1 - 10 of about 986 for INSTG8R. (0.20 seconds)
guess I should check my other handle too....
Results 1 - 10 of about 592 for LT.INSTG8R. (0.50 seconds)

[wazzledoozle]

Results 1 - 10 of about 6,840 for wazzledoozle. (0.68 seconds)
pwned!

I should also note I created the word wazzledoozle, so no one else is using it :D :D

[djbbenn]

Results 1 - 10 of about 458 for djbbenn. (0.19 seconds)

-Dan

[wazzledoozle]

If I drop a "n" (djbben) of my user name I get 97,100 in .33s lol.

-Dan
Results 1 - 10 of about 436 for djbbenn. (0.27 seconds)
:rockout:

[Steevo]

Results 1 - 10 of about 76,600 for Steevo. (0.16 seconds)

[djbbenn]

I relised that it changed my "j" to an "i"... bah... meh 458 is good. :laugh:

-Dan

[Urlyin]

Results 1 - 10 of about 3,030 for urlyin. (0.40 seconds) :slap:

[thedivinehairband]

1-4 of 38

all on TPU. :p

im all alone!! :cry:

or at least truly unique!! :rockout:

[Dippyskoodlez]

bout 1000 for me.. 950 for dippyskoodlez, 290 for dippy_skoodlez

[KennyT772]

wow this is pretty sweet... i should have over 2k just from yoshi's forums but heh oh well. as we all know wizz pwns all

[Dippyskoodlez]

wow this is pretty sweet... i should have over 2k just from yoshi's forums but heh oh well. as we all know wizz pwns all

google.. atitool... lol 223000, and ati tool gets 2,370,000!

[W2hCYK]

Results 1 - 5 of about 306 for w2hcyk. (0.58 seconds)

I think im losing... lol...

[W1zzard]

you have to search "atitool" not "ati tool"

lol i just found: http://www.atitools.com/

[Urlyin]

you have to search "atitool" not "ati tool"

lol i just found: http://www.atitools.com/

Hmmm I see plenty of "ATITools" but no video cards :slap: but man I could sure do some damage with these ... :nutkick:

[Dippyskoodlez]

you have to search "atitool" not "ati tool"

lol i just found: http://www.atitools.com/


I did both.. :)

[65tweet]

Results 1 - 10 of about 848 for 65tweet

HMM... I found out 65tweet.com sells domain names. Never thought to look and see if anything existed. What about you guys?

[AMDCam]

Results 1-10 of about 13,600. YEAH!!!!! I have a lot to say about stuff lol.

[BIOHazard87]

i get 967 :)

[giorgos th.]

i believe i`m the abolute winner.....:nutkick:

[luis_pedro_Sato]

About 1.480

[Anarion]

121,000

[ShadowFlare]

121,000

Mine beats even yours. :) 145,000

3rd one on there is my site. ;) Well, you could say 2nd, though, since the 2nd one is just a link to another part of the 1st one. BTW, in the search results it goes something like this: site's main page, download page, my site's main page, download page. :D One more bit of information: I think my site is older than the one that is above mine in the results.

-EDIT-

LOL, my April Fools Day news post shows in the search results. :laugh:

[Anarion]

hey shadow , what about 9npaj+ ! is it good ? one it suppose to be SLI , 2@2.6 is kinda weak point & also about bios (older is better or newer)

[ShadowFlare]

hey shadow , what about 9npaj+ ! is it good ? one it suppose to be SLI , 2@2.6 is kinda weak point & also about bios (older is better or newer)
Sorry, I'm not really sure what you are asking. :ohwell:

[Anarion]

:D , i just wanna know!?, did u try , to oc it more . also is it sli ? & older bios is better or not .

[Anarion]

hey shadow , what about 9npaj+ ! is it good ? one it suppose to be SLI , 2@2.6 is kinda weak point & also about bios (older is better or newer)


& read this in this way ;

hey shadow

what about 9npaj+

is it good ?

one.(i mean NO.1) it suppose to be SLI

2@2.6 is kinda weak point ==== 2.(NO.2) oc at 2.6 is a kind of weak point for this mb .

also about bios .(older is better or newer)

this is my usual problem , spk "so tooooo" fast & write careless . wish me luck :p

[ShadowFlare]

& read this in this way ;

hey shadow

what about 9npaj+

is it good ?

one.(i mean NO.1) it suppose to be SLI
Mine is the 9NPA+Ultra, so no SLI.

2@2.6 is kinda weak point ==== 2.(NO.2) oc at 2.6 is a kind of weak point for this mb .
I don't really know if that's the maximum I could get or not; I haven't really tried increasing the voltage yet. I think it might automatically increase the voltage some when overclocking, though. Also, I think I might possibly not have my cpu cooling set up well enough to adequately cool the cpu when overclocking higher than that. For example, I might have put a little more thermal compound on the cpu than what was needed... I might redo it someday.

also about bios .(older is better or newer)
In terms of stability and speed, I haven't really noticed any differences at all. Right now I'm using the newest bios with no problems. With some of the updates they do include more overclocking options, though. For example, some of the updates have increased the ranges on some settings.

BTW, I don't leave my system overclocked. I just wanted to see how high it could go and then after that just use the stock settings.

[Anarion]

Mine is the 9NPA+Ultra, so no SLI.


I don't really know if that's the maximum I could get or not; I haven't really tried increasing the voltage yet. I think it might automatically increase the voltage some when overclocking, though. Also, I think I might possibly not have my cpu cooling set up well enough to adequately cool the cpu when overclocking higher than that. For example, I might have put a little more thermal compound on the cpu than what was needed... I might redo it someday.

tnx i get what iwant to know , btw epox uses a nifty technique (always over voltage !!!) over ur normal voltage or oc voltage :ohwell:

with venice (.09µ Process , 70°C tcMax ,Mp 10) it should oc to 3250 (pi & prime stable) easily with ur current cooler. :D


In terms of stability and speed, I haven't really noticed any differences at all. Right now I'm using the newest bios with no problems. With some of the updates they do include more overclocking options, though. For example, some of the updates have increased the ranges on some settings.

i just ask this, becoz with mine , ihad some stability issues with new bioss.



BTW, I don't leave my system overclocked. I just wanted to see how high it could go and then after that just use the stock settings.

i just can't ! i MUST SHOULD SHALL , !!! push it to its limits & if not, i can't sleep well:twitch: :ohwell: :(

[gygabite]

I haven't known that I am a company selling video cards , mainboards, etc.
I thought the company is called Gigabyte, but not gygabite...
100 reviews on motherboards, vga, etc