- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Messages
- 1,193 (0.19/day)
- Location
- Bellevue, WA
System Name | 0BL1V10N |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i7 11700K @ 5.1GHz all-core turbo |
Motherboard | ASRock Z590 Taichi |
Cooling | Cooler Master MasterLiquid 360 (with stock CM fans), 12x Pccooler Moonlight Series ARGB 120mm fans |
Memory | (4x16GB) 64GB Mushkin Redline Lumina 3600MHz 16-19-19-39 XMP |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID 24G (not using stock fans) (+150MHz core, +1000MHz memory) |
Storage | Western Digital Black SN850X 2TB Gen4 NVMe |
Display(s) | 1x Alienware AW3821DW (3840x1600@144Hz), 2x Dell SE2717H (1080p@75Hz) |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo 719 Anthracite Grey |
Audio Device(s) | Schiit Modius + Drop THX AAA 789 + Custom Planar Magnetic Headphones |
Power Supply | Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 1200W (12VHPWR) |
Mouse | Logitech G502 X Plus |
Keyboard | Too many custom mechanical builds to list... |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 22H2 |
Built this for a customer at work. He needed it done in a few hours so I didn't get to run any benches really, but it was fast let me tell you that.
Intel Smackover Motherboard
Intel Core i7 Extreme 965 3.2GHz Engineering Sample (also had a i7 920 2.66GHz Engineering Sample as a "spare")
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme 1366 + AS5
3GB Qimonda DDR3 (cheap stuff, temp till he gets a better kit I guess)
NVIDIA Quadro FX4800 1.5GB
Intel SSDSA2MH080G1C5 80GB SATA SSD (benches on this later)
Dual 500GB Seagate 7200.11 500GB
Dual Seagate 15k Cheetahs w/ 8 port Promise SAS Controller (customer didn't have cables, didn't use these, didn't even check drive sizes)
ASUS 20x DL DVD-RW SATA
Antec P182B
Antec True Power Quattro 850w
What little benches I got I will post later.
EDIT:
Here is the SSD bench and overall stats on the system:
EDIT:
Here are 3D Mark 06 and 3D Mark Vantage scores...
Now what I don't understand is how my computer gets better benches, check my system specs.
I can understand my 8800 Ultra beating a FX4800 which is a card tuned for CAD etc, but how the heck does my quad core Q6600 at 3.6GHz (being an older cpu design) get 10k more points in Vantage (i7 -> 20347, my Q6600 -> 32054) than a top of the line i7 965 3.2GHz quad core with 8 threads? My Q6600 is only .4GHz faster with my OC.
I know that 3D Mark can be a poor benchmark but the result is still bothering me.
Intel Smackover Motherboard
Intel Core i7 Extreme 965 3.2GHz Engineering Sample (also had a i7 920 2.66GHz Engineering Sample as a "spare")
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme 1366 + AS5
3GB Qimonda DDR3 (cheap stuff, temp till he gets a better kit I guess)
NVIDIA Quadro FX4800 1.5GB
Intel SSDSA2MH080G1C5 80GB SATA SSD (benches on this later)
Dual 500GB Seagate 7200.11 500GB
Dual Seagate 15k Cheetahs w/ 8 port Promise SAS Controller (customer didn't have cables, didn't use these, didn't even check drive sizes)
ASUS 20x DL DVD-RW SATA
Antec P182B
Antec True Power Quattro 850w
What little benches I got I will post later.
EDIT:
Here is the SSD bench and overall stats on the system:
EDIT:
Here are 3D Mark 06 and 3D Mark Vantage scores...
Now what I don't understand is how my computer gets better benches, check my system specs.
I can understand my 8800 Ultra beating a FX4800 which is a card tuned for CAD etc, but how the heck does my quad core Q6600 at 3.6GHz (being an older cpu design) get 10k more points in Vantage (i7 -> 20347, my Q6600 -> 32054) than a top of the line i7 965 3.2GHz quad core with 8 threads? My Q6600 is only .4GHz faster with my OC.
I know that 3D Mark can be a poor benchmark but the result is still bothering me.
Last edited: