W
wolf2009
Guest
so my HD4870 is not being used 100% in TF2. its only being used 44% max. is it because of my res 1280x1024 ? cpu is q9450 at 3.2Ghz.
System Name | Mean Machine |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5 2400 at 3.1 GHz |
Motherboard | Asus can't remember the model |
Cooling | Cooler Master Hyper 103 |
Memory | Kingston 4GB 1600 DDR3 |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte 6850 1 GB |
Storage | WD Cavier SEII 3200AAKS 320 GB and Seagate 500 GB |
Display(s) | HP X22 LED |
Case | Generic |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Sound Blaster Audigy |
Power Supply | Cooler Master Real Power Pro 650W |
Software | Pro/E, Delcam Powermill, These things just for work. |
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
System Name | Mean Machine |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5 2400 at 3.1 GHz |
Motherboard | Asus can't remember the model |
Cooling | Cooler Master Hyper 103 |
Memory | Kingston 4GB 1600 DDR3 |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte 6850 1 GB |
Storage | WD Cavier SEII 3200AAKS 320 GB and Seagate 500 GB |
Display(s) | HP X22 LED |
Case | Generic |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Sound Blaster Audigy |
Power Supply | Cooler Master Real Power Pro 650W |
Software | Pro/E, Delcam Powermill, These things just for work. |
tf2 is very cpu limited
tf2 is very cpu limited
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
i think we'll be dropping tf2 in the next complete rebench, and l4d probably too because its buggy as hell with new gpus.
btw: dont forget to use some kind of steam emulator with those games if you are looking to use those benchmarks for reviews. your fps data can be screwed big time by some steam auto updater thingie suddenly running, or the latest update improving fps by xx%.
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
google is your friendwhat kind of steam emulator do you mean ? how can you run those games without steam ?
no idea if that approach is accurate, i never use it for benchmarking. You can use the +timedemoquit parameter to run a timedemo, save the results to some log file and quit. i noticed that a single run to warm up file system caches helps to get more reliable resultsbtw i'm using a custom recorded gameplay timedemo , playing it with the demo player tool that can be accessed by Shift+F2 and measuring FPS with FRAPS, is the result accurate in terms of avg, min, max fps with that method ?
no idea if that approach is accurate, i never use it for benchmarking. You can use the +timedemoquit parameter to run a timedemo, save the results to some log file and quit. i noticed that a single run to warm up file system caches helps to get more reliable results
System Name | Water |
---|---|
Processor | Q9550 Stock |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q Pro |
Cooling | Noctua big ass cooler |
Memory | Corsair Dominator PC8500 4 GB |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire HD7950 |
Storage | Velociraptor 300 GB, Samsung 500 GB, MyBook 300 GB |
Display(s) | 1: Eizo 23" LCD Foris FS2331-BK 2: Samsung 226BW |
Case | Cooler Master ATCS 840 |
Audio Device(s) | Asus STX |
Power Supply | Corsair HX520 |
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
doesn't that approach try to play the demo as fast as possible ? if so wouldn't the min and max data by FRAPS be inaccurate ?
yes, but it would load the gpu more which is the objective of a gpu review? your methodology might differ though, i guess there is something like a "demoquit" parameter too
Processor | Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz |
---|---|
Motherboard | AsRock Z470 Taichi |
Cooling | Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans |
Memory | 32GB DDR4-3600 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 2070 Super |
Storage | 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache |
Display(s) | Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28" |
Case | Fractal Design Define S |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard is good enough for me |
Power Supply | eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3 |
Software | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
I made a quick observation during some gaming.
Settings: 1680x1050
4xAA
UT3 ~60-70% usage
Painkiller ~90-100% usage
Older games = more optimized?
yes, but it would load the gpu more which is the objective of a gpu review? your methodology might differ though, i guess there is something like a "demoquit" parameter too
System Name | Compy 386 |
---|---|
Processor | 7800X3D |
Motherboard | Asus |
Cooling | Air for now..... |
Memory | 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz |
Video Card(s) | 7900XTX 310 Merc |
Storage | Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning |
Display(s) | 56" Samsung 4K HDR |
Audio Device(s) | ATI HDMI |
Mouse | Logitech MX518 |
Keyboard | Razer |
Software | A lot. |
Benchmark Scores | Its fast. Enough. |
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
W1zz, is there any way we could have a few benchmarks done with GTA4?
System Name | Compy 386 |
---|---|
Processor | 7800X3D |
Motherboard | Asus |
Cooling | Air for now..... |
Memory | 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz |
Video Card(s) | 7900XTX 310 Merc |
Storage | Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning |
Display(s) | 56" Samsung 4K HDR |
Audio Device(s) | ATI HDMI |
Mouse | Logitech MX518 |
Keyboard | Razer |
Software | A lot. |
Benchmark Scores | Its fast. Enough. |
nope. i did look into this last week and decided to boycott gta 4 due to retarded copy protection, drm and gay launcher.
maybe if they release a version that runs without internet access and launcher i'll revisit this.
gta 4 engine sucks anyway. i added hawx and dawn of war 2 to our benchmarks which will appear after the next full rebench
Some games also place a large demand on the memory of a graphics card, GTA4for example, I can get a few FPS more by bumping my memory up, but then I get artifacts.
W1zz, is there any way we could have a few benchmarks done with GTA4?
System Name | Built Entirely With Parts From CompUSA |
---|---|
Processor | E7400 2.8 @ 3.6 [9.0*400/1.31v] |
Motherboard | Gigabyte EP45-UD3R |
Cooling | Masscool 8WA741 |
Memory | 2x1GB Corsair XMS2 800 4-4-4-12 |
Video Card(s) | BFG 9800GTX+OC; GTS250 BIOS |
Storage | 2x WD 250GB AAKS in RAID0! |
Display(s) | 19" I-Inc LCD @ 1440x900 |
Case | Ultra X-Blaster Clear Side |
Audio Device(s) | Audigy with X-Fi drivers; Logitech X-540s |
Power Supply | Corsair TX750 |
Software | Vista 32-Bit |
thanks for the tip,
what kind of steam emulator do you mean ? how can you run those games without steam ?
btw i'm using a custom recorded gameplay timedemo , playing it with the demo player tool that can be accessed by Shift+F2 and measuring FPS with FRAPS, is the result accurate in terms of avg, min, max fps with that method ?