• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Removes Restriction on ATI GPUs with NVIDIA GPUs Processing PhysX

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64

Regeneration

NGOHQ.COM
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
3,076 (0.46/day)
Actually, if you believe Regeneration from NGOHQ, it is a big conspiricy by nVidia...because nVidia has so much power they can get anti-virus makers to put false positives in their software...:rolleyes:

That wasn't just a regular false positive! It was a gamer-virus-false-positive. Jeeeee!! What a coincidence.

Instead of checking up those false positive reports, both sites rush to censor the word NGOHQ from their sites and warn users not to download anything from our site.

Those sites seem to think they should report any news that hits any site without investigation, hasn't reported the latest PhysX development - like all the other sites, and yet they report some random false positive virus responses to known wrappers.

Just recently Gabriel Torres from Hardware Secrets got blacklisted by Nvidia, because he refused to be their puppet.

So yes, I believe someone has intentionally tricked Symantec. Who? I don't know. But if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, good chances that... it is a duck.
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
Shhhh...

It isn't the mod-maker's fault, all those anti-viruses are just shit.:rolleyes:

IMO... yeah, the ones that showed it as a virus ARE shit AV's. kaspersky, nod32, arent in there. neither is MSE for that matter.


still, with so many shit AV's on the market, it is best to pack things in a way they wont whine about.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (3.81/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
IMO... yeah, the ones that showed it as a virus ARE shit AV's. kaspersky, nod32, arent in there. neither is MSE for that matter.


still, with so many shit AV's on the market, it is best to pack things in a way they wont whine about.

Exactly. I trust that it's clean, but many wouldn't. Put that up on Demonoid, for instance, and it would get nuked the instant somebody posted those VT results.

I agree, most of them aren't very good AVs, but that many hits is going to cause controversy.
 
W

wahdangun

Guest
so how exactly this patch work?

and btw is this patch effect my save game?
 

GenL

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
You mistunderstand me.
I believe i understand you. Such rants always could be biased (i mean all sides - fud is everywhere, you know!), but everyone have to agree that it came from HardOCP at first. Yes, i disagree with some points Regeneration posted at NGOHQ about this, as i stated in my comments there, although they all seem to be valid for most users who don't deeply understand how AV software works. It's not a big deal.
The accusal without any proofs is what i really refuse to understand. Moreover, the original author of those claims refused to even try to get any proofs after i contacted him. So i'll just stick with a fact that all those tech-sites relations are serious business and i don't really need/want to understand their policies.

you really need to use a different packing method.
It isn't the mod-maker's fault, all those anti-viruses are just shit.
I suggest everyone who wants to understand my point about this, to spend some time and read a topic at Rage3D: www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33962732
My standpoint is fully explained in my posts there.

so how exactly this patch work?

and btw is this patch effect my save game?
How it works, is explained just under the screenshots there at the original topic: http://www.ngohq.com/graphic-cards/17716-batman-arkham-asylum-msaa-fix.html
No, it shouldn't affect your savegames.

I want to see more comparison screen shots with and without in game AA, on both brands of cards at the same settings.
I would like to see it too. I can't do it by myself, sorry.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
That wasn't just a regular false positive! It was a gamer-virus-false-positive. Jeeeee!! What a coincidence.

Instead of checking up those false positive reports, both sites rush to censor the word NGOHQ from their sites and warn users not to download anything from our site.

Those sites seem to think they should report any news that hits any site without investigation, hasn't reported the latest PhysX development - like all the other sites, and yet they report some random false positive virus responses to known wrappers.

Just recently Gabriel Torres from Hardware Secrets got blacklisted by Nvidia, because he refused to be their puppet.

So yes, I believe someone has intentionally tricked Symantec. Who? I don't know. But if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, good chances that... it is a duck.

Look at the god damn results, there are like 20 anti-viruses that report the false positive. Use a different wrapper that doesn't trip AVs, and stop all this BS nVidia is out to get us crap. Symantec certainly has no reason to bow down to nVidia and put false positives in their software because nVidia wanted them to. It is completely idiotic to even suggest that the false positive was caused by anything other then your use of a poor wrapper.

And Gabriel Torres deserved to be blacklisted. His reviews are complete shit, he wants nVidia to keep giving him free samples, but won't even put CUDA and PhysX in a feature list when asked. I wouldn't give him free shit either.
 
Last edited:

Regeneration

NGOHQ.COM
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
3,076 (0.46/day)
Look at the god damn results, there are like 20 anti-viruses that report the false positive. Use a different wrapper that doesn't trip AVs, and stop all this BS nVidia is out to get us crap. Symantec certainly has no reason to bow down to nVidia and put false positives in their software because nVidia wanted them to. It is completely idiotic to even suggest that the false positive was caused by anything other then your use of a poor wrapper.

You twisted my post. False positives usually look like this:

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/...4e442ccc23cedec214b355c04157061fdb-1274174744

It is pretty simple to take a binary, bundle it with a trojan and submit it to AV vendors. Anyone can do it.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (3.81/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
You twisted my post. False positives usually look like this:

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/...4e442ccc23cedec214b355c04157061fdb-1274174744

It is pretty simple to take a binary, bundle it with a trojan and submit it to AV vendors. Anyone can do it.

If I didn't already know, test and trust the patch myself, and have a basic understanding of AV and packing, 11 hits earns it a nuke in my book. I won't mess with an 11 hit file unless I have no other choice, then I sandbox it first. 4 or 5 hits on the lesser AVs, and I might take a chance, start getting into double digits, and I'm looking for something else if at all possible.

Somebody donate him a better packer if need be, and the controversy disappears altogether. Shit, I'd donate to get him a better packer that doesn't throw a million false positives.
 

GenL

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
Somebody donate him a better packer if need be, and the controversy disappears altogether. Shit, I'd donate to get him a better packer that doesn't throw a million false positives.
That's what i tried to tell at Rage3D - it really has nothing to do with money, as it won't help here.
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
10,020 (1.91/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
3,393 (0.58/day)
Location
BC.CAN
Processor 2700x under H100i progeebee
Motherboard ASUS x470 prime
Cooling Fans
Memory gskill ripjaw 3200
Video Card(s) MSi Vega 64 ref
Storage 120Gb OCZ Vertex 2E SSD - 500Gb Games - 1.5tb Storage and Media
Case CM HAF 932
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software Win 10
So I got some "new" shiny to play with. I'll be testing them tonight individually (rig in specs) but I'm a little worried about power draw. I think I'll most likely underclock the cards to around 500Mhz core. Do you guys think my system will be able to cope? Keep in mind my 5970 runs stock clocks.

Also assuming both cards check out and run perfectly there is a chance one will go up for sale if anyone is interested they can PM me.

 

OnBoard

New Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
3,033 (0.47/day)
Location
Finland
Processor Core i5-750 @ 3.6GHz 1.136V 24/7
Motherboard Gigabyte P55A-UD3, SATA 6Gbit/s & USB3.0 baby!
Cooling Alpenföhn Brocken HeatpipeDirectTouch
Memory Geil Ultra Series 4GB 2133MHz DDR3 @ 1440MHz 7-7-7-24
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB OC (mostly stock speeds)
Storage OS: Samsung F3 500GB Games: Samsung F1 640GB
Display(s) new! Samsung P2350 23" FullHD 2ms / Mirai DTL-632E500 32" LCD
Case new! Xigmatek Midgard/Utgard side window with red cathodes, 1x140mm & 3x120mm fans
Audio Device(s) new! ASUS Xonar DG & JVC HA-RX700 headphones
Power Supply Cougar CM 700W Modular
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64
Benchmark Scores Logitech UltraX Premium & G5 laser v2 + Ulti-mat Breathe X2 for fragging
I think I'll most likely underclock the cards to around 500Mhz core. Do you guys think my system will be able to cope?

Underclock memory as low as it goes and if you underclock core make sure it's not linked with shaders. Although it might have plenty of performance on lower shaders too. And yes, should cope. PhysX doesn't peak the cards power consumption.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
If I didn't already know, test and trust the patch myself, and have a basic understanding of AV and packing, 11 hits earns it a nuke in my book. I won't mess with an 11 hit file unless I have no other choice, then I sandbox it first. 4 or 5 hits on the lesser AVs, and I might take a chance, start getting into double digits, and I'm looking for something else if at all possible.

Somebody donate him a better packer if need be, and the controversy disappears altogether. Shit, I'd donate to get him a better packer that doesn't throw a million false positives.

You know, I would think it would be good practice to run any file you are going to distribute through that checker, if it generates false positives, then fix it before making it public...and of course don't fly off the handle with conspiricy theorys about everyone running a scam against you with nVidia at the top when reports start coming in about the false positives...

And isn't the 7zip packer free?
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
812 (0.13/day)
Location
Almonte, Canada
System Name Sonny Boy
Processor i5 11600K 4.9GHz @ 1.35 Vcore
Motherboard AORUS Z590 Elite AX
Cooling Deepcool Gammix 240mm AIO
Memory 4 X 8GB Teamgroup DDR4 3200MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Storage Adata Legend 1TB
Display(s) Philips 27" 4K
Power Supply Corsair 750W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer Huntsman V2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Underclock memory as low as it goes and if you underclock core make sure it's not linked with shaders. Although it might have plenty of performance on lower shaders too. And yes, should cope. PhysX doesn't peak the cards power consumption.

My GT240 with only 96 shaders is used less than 60% even in Batman Arkham Asylum. In UT3 Physx levels it tops at about 25% GPU usage. Fluidmark benchmark only gets it to about 45% usage. That suggests to me that your 112 cores on the 8800GT would be just fine running at a lower clock to reduce temps and fan noise (those single slot 8800GT coolers are noisy). And as suggested I don't believe memory bandwidth plays much of a role at all so you could downclock that a bit too.
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
3,393 (0.58/day)
Location
BC.CAN
Processor 2700x under H100i progeebee
Motherboard ASUS x470 prime
Cooling Fans
Memory gskill ripjaw 3200
Video Card(s) MSi Vega 64 ref
Storage 120Gb OCZ Vertex 2E SSD - 500Gb Games - 1.5tb Storage and Media
Case CM HAF 932
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software Win 10
Underclock memory as low as it goes and if you underclock core make sure it's not linked with shaders. Although it might have plenty of performance on lower shaders too. And yes, should cope. PhysX doesn't peak the cards power consumption.

Thanks, I've never clocked an NV card before so I'm not really sure where to start. I have the feeling I can use EVGA precision with any NV GPU so I'll probably start with that. From what I understand physx power draw is pretty low and physx doesn't even saturate PCI-e x1.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
My GT240 with only 96 shaders is used less than 60% even in Batman Arkham Asylum. In UT3 Physx levels it tops at about 25% GPU usage. Fluidmark benchmark only gets it to about 45% usage. That suggests to me that your 112 cores on the 8800GT would be just fine running at a lower clock to reduce temps and fan noise (those single slot 8800GT coolers are noisy). And as suggested I don't believe memory bandwidth plays much of a role at all so you could downclock that a bit too.

I just did an interesting quick write up on this exact subject.

Using a 9600GT LP, which is already underclocked from stock 9600GT specs, with only 64 shaders, there was actually no performance benefit of having it in my main rig as a dedicated with a GTX470, tested with Batman:AA.

Underclocking the 9600GT as low as the sliders would let me go in MSI Afterburner dropped the FPS about 3-5FPS.

So even an 8800GT is probably overkill, even if everything is underclocked as low as possible.

Thanks, I've never clocked an NV card before so I'm not really sure where to start. I have the feeling I can use EVGA precision with any NV GPU so I'll probably start with that. From what I understand physx power draw is pretty low and physx doesn't even saturate PCI-e x1.

I'd try using the latest version of MSI Afterburner(1.6.0 Beta 6), it works with any nVidia cards like Precisions, but seems to work better with the latest drivers. I had some problems getting the latest version of Precision to read the clock speeds properly and actually overclock my GTX470 when I moved the sliders.
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
3,393 (0.58/day)
Location
BC.CAN
Processor 2700x under H100i progeebee
Motherboard ASUS x470 prime
Cooling Fans
Memory gskill ripjaw 3200
Video Card(s) MSi Vega 64 ref
Storage 120Gb OCZ Vertex 2E SSD - 500Gb Games - 1.5tb Storage and Media
Case CM HAF 932
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software Win 10
I wonder if it will conflict with my 5970 though. Unless the latest AB 1.6.0 has a drop box to choose which card to configure... I use AB to clock my 5970 and I cant see how I would possibly differentiate between GPUs in the program.

The older precision should recognize the 8800GT regardless of drivers no? Unless in the case of your 470 precision worked until you changed drivers then that's another issue.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I wonder if it will conflict with my 5970 though. Unless the latest AB 1.6.0 has a drop box to choose which card to configure... I use AB to clock my 5970 and I cant see how I would possibly differentiate between GPUs in the program.

The older precision should recognize the 8800GT regardless of drivers no? Unless in the case of your 470 precision worked until you changed drivers then that's another issue.

I only ever tried with the latest drivers, so I'm not sure, it could be the card or the drivers.

Afterburner has a place in the settings to switch GPUs, though I don't know if it will apply the different profiles/clocks to both cards at the same time, or if it will only work on one card at a time.
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
3,393 (0.58/day)
Location
BC.CAN
Processor 2700x under H100i progeebee
Motherboard ASUS x470 prime
Cooling Fans
Memory gskill ripjaw 3200
Video Card(s) MSi Vega 64 ref
Storage 120Gb OCZ Vertex 2E SSD - 500Gb Games - 1.5tb Storage and Media
Case CM HAF 932
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software Win 10
I only ever tried with the latest drivers, so I'm not sure, it could be the card or the drivers.

Afterburner has a place in the settings to switch GPUs, though I don't know if it will apply the different profiles/clocks to both cards at the same time, or if it will only work on one card at a time.

OK, I'll look for it but I plan to keep the 5970 stock for most of the tests tonight so I think AB should work.
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
3,393 (0.58/day)
Location
BC.CAN
Processor 2700x under H100i progeebee
Motherboard ASUS x470 prime
Cooling Fans
Memory gskill ripjaw 3200
Video Card(s) MSi Vega 64 ref
Storage 120Gb OCZ Vertex 2E SSD - 500Gb Games - 1.5tb Storage and Media
Case CM HAF 932
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software Win 10
One care smoked when I powered up the system and when the other card was installed the system did boot but wouldn't display video.
 

OnBoard

New Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
3,033 (0.47/day)
Location
Finland
Processor Core i5-750 @ 3.6GHz 1.136V 24/7
Motherboard Gigabyte P55A-UD3, SATA 6Gbit/s & USB3.0 baby!
Cooling Alpenföhn Brocken HeatpipeDirectTouch
Memory Geil Ultra Series 4GB 2133MHz DDR3 @ 1440MHz 7-7-7-24
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB OC (mostly stock speeds)
Storage OS: Samsung F3 500GB Games: Samsung F1 640GB
Display(s) new! Samsung P2350 23" FullHD 2ms / Mirai DTL-632E500 32" LCD
Case new! Xigmatek Midgard/Utgard side window with red cathodes, 1x140mm & 3x120mm fans
Audio Device(s) new! ASUS Xonar DG & JVC HA-RX700 headphones
Power Supply Cougar CM 700W Modular
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64
Benchmark Scores Logitech UltraX Premium & G5 laser v2 + Ulti-mat Breathe X2 for fragging
One care smoked when I powered up the system and when the other card was installed the system did boot but wouldn't display video.

Eew, now you have to merge them together to get one working card :)
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
812 (0.13/day)
Location
Almonte, Canada
System Name Sonny Boy
Processor i5 11600K 4.9GHz @ 1.35 Vcore
Motherboard AORUS Z590 Elite AX
Cooling Deepcool Gammix 240mm AIO
Memory 4 X 8GB Teamgroup DDR4 3200MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Storage Adata Legend 1TB
Display(s) Philips 27" 4K
Power Supply Corsair 750W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer Huntsman V2
Software Windows 11 Pro
One care smoked when I powered up the system and when the other card was installed the system did boot but wouldn't display video.

Probably not related but I did need to make dummy plug for the Physx card. Otherwise the nvidia driver disables it.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Probably not related but I did need to make dummy plug for the Physx card. Otherwise the nvidia driver disables it.

If your monitor has two inputs you can just hook up the extra input to the PhysX card. Works for me. :)
 
Top