1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2008
- Messages
- 10,421 (1.85/day)
- Location
- Duluth, Minnesota
System Name | My Comp | Fiancees Comp |
---|---|
Processor | i7 5820k @ 4.6Ghz 1.285v| i5 2500k |
Motherboard | MSI x99 SLI Plus | AsRock Z77 Pro 3 |
Cooling | Watercooled |
Memory | 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 2666 | 12GB DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | AMD R9 290x | MSI 5850 OC |
Storage | 128gb SSD + 2x 2TB | 2TB |
Display(s) | Asus 27" LCD | 25" Hanns G |
Case | CM Storm | CM Elite 430 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Recon 3D PCIe |
Power Supply | Enermax Galaxy 1250W | Rosewill 630w |
Mouse | Logitech G700s | Logitech G100s |
Keyboard | Logitech G901 | Logitech G105 |
Software | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 |
Benchmark Scores | 3D Mark - Fire Strike Extreme - 4403 |
I for one agree that games should always be 100% accurate at all times. It offends me greatly whenever a game is not totally realistic down to the most minute detail. I think while we are at it we should make it so that right when you die the game is over and you can never play it again, ever. You get shot once, game over man, move on to the next game because you're done.
Why does everyone have to be sarcastic, or are people just reading the OP then responding, because about 10 people have already beat you to the punch, this post has been so off topic.
To see some real swords would be nice, he's sick of anime crap, he's not saying 100% realistic. I guess Battlefield and COD aren't 100% real, since they aren't maybe they should be dressed as clowns with jet packs that shoot balloon animals... theres 2 ends to the spectrum, and a bunch of variation between, don't forget that middle, it does exist and almost any game out there uses it, he's just looking to see that move a bit more towards the realistic side.