CPU-Z 1.7.x

[Arctucas]

Yea,I said above latest portable is from 2012-03-24.

Which is the version that displays the incorrect memory frequency?

I suppose I should have asked if the 1.60.1 BETA had an update, my apologies.

 

[stasio]

CPU-Z 1.60.1 Beta

- x32-bit (updated 2012-04-05)

http://www.cpuid.com/medias/files/softwares/betas/cpuz_160_03.zip

 

[Shou Miko]

Thx Stasio this fixes the memory reading problems i have and voltage issues reading the correct voltage ^^

 

[stasio]

Now OK?

 

[Shou Miko]

Now OK?

yap, the last one before this update read only 3568mb when i ran my memory at 2133mhz but the 1.60 x32 read all 4096mb together with this update ^^

 

[Drone]

What's the difference between cpuz 32 bit and 64? If I use 32 bit version in 64 bit system will cpuz show wrong info?

 

[Shou Miko]

Drone i would say no, but since i haven't tested that i can't give u an honest answer, but if u got 64bit install u can test it out.

 

[Arctucas]

Now OK?

Same problem as before:

 

[Shou Miko]

Same problem as before:

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll305/Arctucas/CPU-Zmemspeed4-5-12.jpg

well most of the information is correct but u run 64bit so stick with the 64bit version ofc, but the 32bit will run ofc

 

[Arctucas]

well most of the information is correct but u run 64bit so stick with the 64bit version ofc, but the 32bit will run ofc

The 1.60.1 x64 does the same thing.

All other versions of CPU-Z, whether x86 or x64, as well as several other applications, report the correct values.

It is only the 1.60.1 BETA that is wrong.

Hopefully it will be corrected in the next release.

 

[Shou Miko]

if u got a ini file with the beta delete it, it sometimes fixes ur problems.

 

[Arctucas]

if u got a ini file with the beta delete it, it sometimes fixes ur problems.

No .ini, only the executable.

I am sure CPUID will correct the error in upcoming versions.

It is unfortunate they (CPUID) have no forum on their website for people to discuss these issues.

 

[Maban]

It is unfortunate they (CPUID) have no forum on their website for people to discuss these issues.

Sure they do. http://forum.canardpc.com/forums/74-CPU-Z-Official-forum?

 

[stasio]

CPU-Z 1.60.1 Beta

- x32-bit (updated 2012-04-16)

http://www.cpuid.com/medias/files/softwares/betas/cpuz_160_04.zip

 

[Arctucas]

Sure they do. http://forum.canardpc.com/forums/74-CPU-Z-Official-forum?

Thanks for that, I was looking on the CPUID website, but did not see it.

EDIT:

Well, it appears that no answer to my post on the official CPU-Z forum is forthcoming from the developer....

 

[stasio]

CPU-Z 1.60.1

ftp://ftp.cpuid.com/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.60.1-32bits-en.zip
ftp://ftp.cpuid.com/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.60.1-64bits-en.zip
ftp://ftp.cpuid.com/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.60.1-setup-en.exe

ftp://ftp.cpuid.com/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.60.1-64bits-cn.zip
ftp://ftp.cpuid.com/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.60.1-32bits-cn.zip
ftp://ftp.cpuid.com/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.60.1-setup-cn.exe

- Intel Xeon E5 processors.
- Fix wrong CPU clock speed under Win8.
- 23.Apr 12

 

[Arctucas]

Stasio,

Saw your post on the other forum.

New version is still wrong:

Other applications confirm that CPU-Z 1.60.1 is wrong:

AIDA64

SIW

SIV

CPU Tweaker

Speccy

I am just saying...

 

[Daz1967]

I can confirm the same bug in CPU-Z v1.60.1 that Arctucas has.

When I ran this new CPU-Z update this morning I was puzzled when it showed my BCLK as 180 MHz, my Multiplier as 20x and my RAM running at 720 MHz (1,440 MHz effective) when the BIOS and POST, as well as SIW and AIDA64, show the correct (IMO) BCLK of 200 MHz, Multiplier of 18x and RAM speed of 800 MHz (1,600 MHz effective). I also confirmed these settings by running v1.59 of CPU-Z!

Oddly, these misreported readings are actually the previous settings I was using until I increased my memory from 2 x 3 GB 1,333 MHz sticks to 3 x 4 GB 1,600 MHz ones. I have a Core i7-920 clocked at 3.6 GHz on an ASUS P6T Deluxe motherboard, running the most up to date BIOS, v2209.

 

[Daz1967]

P.S. I downloaded CPU-Z v1.60.1 from a link on MajorGeeks not from this site so are they hosting an outdated/older/beta version or is the version I'm using the correct one? It shows v1.60.1 at the bottom of the main window with no reference to a beta or anything.

 

[Drone]

Win8 x64 and I use latest cpuz beta 32 bit. All readings are right

 

[Daz1967]

I forgot to mention that I'm using Windows 7 Home Edition SP1 64-bit.

 

[stasio]

CPU-Z 1.60.1

- x32-bit (updated 2012-04-26)

http://www.cpuid.com/medias/files/software...cpuz_x32_01.zip
http://www.mediafire.com/?0x5e0527gey5bcp

 

[Arctucas]

And... it is still reporting incorrect memory and bus speeds.

 

[Shou Miko]

And... it is still reporting incorrect memory and bus speeds.

hmm if u r the only one having this could it be a Windows issue than?

bcs i noticed as i said sometime back delete all other files than the cpu-z.exe worked for me, but since u run 64bit and that don't for u, i dunno

 

[Arctucas]

I suppose anything is possible.

However, since only the 1.60.1 version (both 32-bit & 64-bit) does it, I would presume there have been some changes to the CPU-Z code that are causing it?

And there is at least one other user (Daz1967) who has the issue.

Also, delete what 'other files', there is only the CPU-Z executable in the folder?