• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

560 TI 2GB vs 7850.. what specs won't tell you.

Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
168 (0.04/day)
Location
In the Ether...probably eating cheetos atm.
System Name Surprising Mini Duece
Processor i3-550 3.2ghz/core (nice little gamer, 98% games = dual core code only)
Motherboard ASUS P7H55M-LE
Cooling Cooler Master Vortex
Memory 8GB Patriot Signature Series 1.5v DDR3 1333Mhz w/ spreaders.
Video Card(s) Old slugger ... EVGA 8800GTS 640Mb SC edition. Soon to be retired.
Storage Segate Sata II 64mb cache 1TB single platter.. fast but chirpy lol
Display(s) 1x Asus VS247h-p 2ms LOVE IT, 1x Sceptre 22" Naga 2ms, 1x 20inch Samsung Syncmaster
Case Aerocool QX-2000 .. my latest project
Audio Device(s) Onboard HD
Power Supply Seasonic x650 Gold! Primo 105Celisius Jap cap wonder.
Software Whatever I can pirate ;) lol jk .. Windows 7 legit license
Benchmark Scores LOL I still get rock steady 57-60FPS in Skyrim on medium settings no AA on this 5 year old video car
This quote came from another site but since this info is commonly sought by people I thought I'd share the post here. Enjoy.

[quote name="insyxion" url="/t/1271115/nvidia-gtx-660-suppose-to-be-299-329#post_17503580"]Since USA is usally cheaper then europe, so i guees its probably gonna be over 340$ in europe..
I'm looking to upgrade my 6870, should i get AMD 7850?
The question i'm most curious about, Is it true that nvidia cards are running most games much smoother?[/quote]

Recently, I tested two cards (for personal purchase) at the same price point ... a Diamond 7850 2GB and an EVGA 2GB 560 ti. I can tell you that, although the 7850 overclocked much higher and had higher FPS (@11FPS higher vs 7850 stock clocks in Furmark) the GTX 560 TI was by far smoother with way less chop and shutter in game. The 560 Ti would chop ONLY for about 10-15 seconds after level load on Diablo III (max settings no v-sync) but the 7850 would chop every time I came upon a large mob or the screen angle changed. I was very dissappointed in the 7850, since it was a 2GB card as well, and the 2GB Memory with buffer should have cut the chop to that of the 560 TI or less. I even tried tripple buffering and it had no affect. Also, once you start adding in AA and other filtering, settings that extra 11FPS is going to get chewed up fast anyways so aslong as either card stays above 60FPS with V-sync on you're good to go even without the 11FPS boost from overclocking IMO. And to get that 1250Mhz clock out of the 7850 while staying at decent temps you're going to need to flash the bios to get around CCC Overdrive and or buy a higher priced model like an ASUS Direct whatever it's called or MSI Twin Frozer III or PE model. You could go aftermarket heatsink but then you'll spend more $, void the warranty and loose Crossfire space. Not worth the extra 5-8FPS over modest 1050Mhz +20%OV imo. I'd rather modest clock to 1050Mhz with 20% overvolting and keep stock fan, CF space and warranty; or, like I said buy a model that can handle higher clocks (with stock HS/Fan and warranty) like the ones mentioned above.

Also just FYI, On temps they both sucked. On noise the EVGA sucked worse becaue the fan sounds like a jet engine at 50%... How EVGA gets around this is they have the heat handling heavy on the passive heatsink side of things. Essentially, they run the fan stock low at about 36%-46% even at full load and thus let the heatsink take on more heat because it is a big ass heat sink. The down side is, at stock clocks and stock fan levels, it will run quite BUT the temps will run over 85-88* C at full load and around 48*C idle. That's why the tests that show the 560 Ti runs quiter is an absolute joke and a lie because it only runs quiter at stock fan curves and the trade off is it runs hot as shizz! The Diamond 7850 had a radial fan with noticeably lower noise above 50% but virtually the same exact temps because I discovered the heat sink heat plate was machined horribly rough like a finger print. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167140

In the end both cards went back to the store and I'm waiting on the GTX 660 Ti before I make any more purchases. I think if I'm going to purchase again it will be a 2 fan model, something like the MSI TwinFroz III, or the Zotac 670 short twin fan model coming out soon. I would suggest that if you're going for an AMD 7850 spend the extra cabbage to get a 2 fan short model like the MSI http://us.msi.com/product/vga/R7850-Power-Edition-2GD5-OC.html or http://us.msi.com/product/vga/R7850-Twin-Frozr-2GD5-OC.html that has a good 2 fan heatsink assembly that can take better advantage of the high overclocking potential of the 7850 GPU and still remain within good temps and not require an aftermarket cooler that takes up Crossfire space. :thumb:

But yes, my personal expierence showed Nivida to run smoother against nearly a direct competitor (7850 is slightly stronger) with all things like game, game settings and CPU remaining constent. The 7850 sucked IMO.. well let's be kinder and say it fell really short of expectations. Oh and catalyst was, is and always will be the biggest piece of crap. Would only see my HDMI monitor as an HDTV even though the onbarod intel chipset picked it up at 1920x1080 no problem. Catalyst gaming profiles saved to .exe never worked properly, colors wonkey, it conflicted with MSI Afterburner startup profile settings and no matter how many times you delete Catalyst profiles they hide in some obscure reg key. All in all, the 7850 has more raw power and higher FPS potential (depending on the game and baring equal tessallation handeling because Nvidia is much better at tessallation handling) but way less fit, finish and finesse imo. Nvidia, as mentioned above by OPs, has smoother operation and way better drivers that work right. Essentially, would you rather drive a big jerky transmition V8 Corvette with bad radio buttons or a smoother Lexus 250 ISF that works right? That's a decent analogy.

Hope this helps. I'm Sorry for wall of text and spelling check crits but it's a lot of info! :thumb:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,228 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
ive generally found this to be true... last direct comparison I did was with the 4870 and the gtx 260 tho.

One review site (still trying to find it) has a metric that measures choppiness i think - you can read their reviews and see exactly.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
1,045 (0.19/day)
Location
Romania
Processor i7-9700
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) msi 1080
Storage Samsung SSD 850 pro 2TB+1tb hdd 7200rpm+ 1tb 970pro
Software Mageia 6 + Windows 10
Well, I think the comparison it is not fair, hd7850 it is not showing all can do because of imature driver/software, but at the end of the day the question remaine:to buy a old vga who work well now but in the future it may be obsolete, or a new vga card who work now with hiccup but in the future will work well; I personally I see that in most cases(on same price) nvidia is stronger in 3D, and amd in 2d;I just buyit 1 month ago a sapphire hd7850 oc, with custom cooling, I can tell that after 3rd driver version it is start to show me what she can do(catalyst 12.4 and 12.6 are crap, 12.7b it is ok), for me the quality of 2d it is more important(I game casually, but when I play I want to enjoy it), but for a gamer it is a tough question what to buy now...
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
168 (0.04/day)
Location
In the Ether...probably eating cheetos atm.
System Name Surprising Mini Duece
Processor i3-550 3.2ghz/core (nice little gamer, 98% games = dual core code only)
Motherboard ASUS P7H55M-LE
Cooling Cooler Master Vortex
Memory 8GB Patriot Signature Series 1.5v DDR3 1333Mhz w/ spreaders.
Video Card(s) Old slugger ... EVGA 8800GTS 640Mb SC edition. Soon to be retired.
Storage Segate Sata II 64mb cache 1TB single platter.. fast but chirpy lol
Display(s) 1x Asus VS247h-p 2ms LOVE IT, 1x Sceptre 22" Naga 2ms, 1x 20inch Samsung Syncmaster
Case Aerocool QX-2000 .. my latest project
Audio Device(s) Onboard HD
Power Supply Seasonic x650 Gold! Primo 105Celisius Jap cap wonder.
Software Whatever I can pirate ;) lol jk .. Windows 7 legit license
Benchmark Scores LOL I still get rock steady 57-60FPS in Skyrim on medium settings no AA on this 5 year old video car
Well, I think the comparison it is not fair, hd7850 it is not showing all can do because of imature driver/software, but at the end of the day the question remaine:to buy a old vga who work well now but in the future it may be obsolete, or a new vga card who work now with hiccup but in the future will work well; I personally I see that in most cases(on same price) nvidia is stronger in 3D, and amd in 2d;I just buyit 1 month ago a sapphire hd7850 oc, with custom cooling, I can tell that after 3rd driver version it is start to show me what she can do(catalyst 12.4 and 12.6 are crap, 12.7b it is ok), for me the quality of 2d it is more important(I game casually, but when I play I want to enjoy it), but for a gamer it is a tough question what to buy now...

Hi pigulici... you know what, you're right, to be fair I shouldn't say that Catalyst will always be crap. I do know that in the day though I opted for Omega drivers that made Catalyst run much smoother. Also, keep in mind this is just my own expierence. Maybe the card is more suited for SB or IB and PCI-E 3.0 which my board and CPU are not; but, both cards were tested on same equipment and the results on chop were less with Nivida "in my opinion" since dealing with things like sound pitch, chop and overall expierence it is more of a qualitative opinion left to me as the individual rather than quanitative analysis with numbers. Also, I can only test with what is out there. I can't depend on future drivers at the time of testing but a side note should be mentioned that this may improve with driver development over time, good point :thumbsup: Furthermore, I could get both of the cards down in cooling but again the fan noise on the EVGA was just too high for gaming without headphones, the Diamond was borderline bareable. Also, the the fact that I'm using the 560 Ti 2Gb is again, it's all that was out there comprable. However, I will say that if weighting the options again for future purchases, I'll still tend to move towards the card with better cooling options, smoother buffer (no chop) with less glitchy drivers over a card with 10-20% higher FPS but choppy, under developed glitchy drivers regardless of whom makes it. Personally, I perfer fit and finish with solid performance and no bugs over a modest increase in power. I mean honestly, I know a certain amount of driver suckage goes with the territory but (as video cards push higher and higher price tags and wage review wars with FPS being the cornerstone) shouldn't we step back a bit and say.... "Hey Mr. video card maker man...If you're gonna charge me close to $300.00 for a "mid-ranged" graphics card; that shiz better be FLAWLESS (including drivers, temps, chop and noise) at it's segments speeds!!!!"? :D ... Also, I will say my tech collegee has an AMD referrence 7970 and he reports minimal chop only at level load like the GTX 560 Ti 2GB I tested so maybe it's driver/specific model related. :toast:

ive generally found this to be true... last direct comparison I did was with the 4870 and the gtx 260 tho.

One review site (still trying to find it) has a metric that measures choppiness i think - you can read their reviews and see exactly.

Thanks Phan, if you please post or send me links I'll check it out... Do any reviews allued to why this is so ? Is it driver or card related ? :toast:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,228 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Here is the link: The tech report

http://techreport.com/articles.x/23150/4

"... We've noticed them at times when results from our FRAPS-based testing didn't seem to square with our seat-of-the-pants experience. The fundamental problem is that, in terms of both computer time and human visual perception, one second is a very long time. Averaging results over a single second can obscure some big and important performance differences between systems."

but yeah - they try to measure "smoothness" and FPS rather than just raw numbers alone... they have a great explanation of why just FPS based testing is misleading:

http://techreport.com/articles.x/21516

This is what *could* be happening with the less smooth card, the 7850 in this case:

"However, GPU 1 has a problem running this game. Let's say it's a texture upload problem caused by poor memory management in the video drivers, although it could be just about anything, including a hardware issue. The result of the problem is that GPU 1 gets stuck when attempting to render one of the frames—really stuck, to the tune of a nearly half-second delay. If you were playing a game on this card and ran into this issue, it would be a huge show-stopper. If it happened often, the game would be essentially unplayable."
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,027 (0.24/day)
Location
Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, M
System Name Oldtimer(Always Crunching)
Processor Intel P4 631 @ 3.2 GHz [Stock 3.0 GHz]
Motherboard Intel D945GCPE
Memory 512 MB x2 DDR2 (533MHZ and 366 MHZ)
Storage 160GB Sata1 7200rpm
Display(s) ViewSonic VA703m
Power Supply Normal 450W PSU
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit
Well Overall The HD7850 is better but in some games GTX 560Ti is better and it also supports PhysX(I know there are very limited range of PhysX games)and you will be needing physX in games epically in Batman Arkham series and Metro2033 and because HD 7850 doesn't support PhysX AMD has to add a plus point and it is you can oc it to even at 580 or 670 levels which is monstrous ocing and the temp will also good at below 75C but to handle this GTX 560TI has a big advantage which is it's price it is 180$ and the price of HD7850 is 240$ So a big difference but My choice still will be the HD7850 for it's monstrous ocing capabilities but you can also get the GTX 480 it is better then bother but as you will be readed the review the GTX 480 is a hot-headed GPU so if you don't mind the temps and the size then GTX 480 will be your choice if not the HD 7850 and if you want to save money the GTX 560Ti!
In the end my chice will be the HD 7850 or the GTX 480!
But the choice is yours!
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
4,815 (0.78/day)
Location
Wangas, New Zealand
System Name Darth Obsidious
Processor Intel i5 2500K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V/Gen3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+ in Push Pull
Memory 2X4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) ASUS R9 270x TOP
Storage 128GB Samsung 830 SSD, 1TB WD Black, 2TB WD Green
Display(s) LG IPS234V-PN
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Infrasonic Quartet
Power Supply Corsair HX650w
Software Windows 7 64bit and Windows XP Home
Benchmark Scores 2cm mark on bench with a razor blade.
In my experience I have always found AMD to either perform really well in a game or not perform well for what it is expected to perform like.

While nVidia generally seems to run well in all games.
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
329 (0.08/day)
Location
Malaysia
System Name Elmo
Processor i9 7900x
Motherboard MSI x299 gaming pro ac
Cooling Noctua NH D-14
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP Extreme RTX 2070 Super
Storage 1TB Samsung 860 Evo, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB, 1 & 2TB Barracuda, Hyperx 120GB, WD Green 500GB
Display(s) Samsung 23" led 1080p X 3
Case Nzxt Switch 810
Power Supply Corsair HX 750W
Software Windows 10 Pro
Well, I think the comparison it is not fair, hd7850 it is not showing all can do because of imature driver/software, but at the end of the day the question remaine:to buy a old vga who work well now but in the future it may be obsolete, or a new vga card who work now with hiccup but in the future will work well; I personally I see that in most cases(on same price) nvidia is stronger in 3D, and amd in 2d;I just buyit 1 month ago a sapphire hd7850 oc, with custom cooling, I can tell that after 3rd driver version it is start to show me what she can do(catalyst 12.4 and 12.6 are crap, 12.7b it is ok), for me the quality of 2d it is more important(I game casually, but when I play I want to enjoy it), but for a gamer it is a tough question what to buy now...
Amd mb amd proc amd gpu nuff said
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
1,045 (0.19/day)
Location
Romania
Processor i7-9700
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) msi 1080
Storage Samsung SSD 850 pro 2TB+1tb hdd 7200rpm+ 1tb 970pro
Software Mageia 6 + Windows 10
Well, one reason it is that in my country amd have better price vs performance than intel/nvidia low/middle segment, and for hardware of high performance segment I have no money(like i7, ...)...but I wish to have, so everyday learn something new...
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
329 (0.08/day)
Location
Malaysia
System Name Elmo
Processor i9 7900x
Motherboard MSI x299 gaming pro ac
Cooling Noctua NH D-14
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP Extreme RTX 2070 Super
Storage 1TB Samsung 860 Evo, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB, 1 & 2TB Barracuda, Hyperx 120GB, WD Green 500GB
Display(s) Samsung 23" led 1080p X 3
Case Nzxt Switch 810
Power Supply Corsair HX 750W
Software Windows 10 Pro
Well, one reason it is that in my country amd have better price vs performance than intel/nvidia low/middle segment, and for hardware of high performance segment I have no money(like i7, ...)...but I wish to have, so everyday learn something new...

Don't feel bad in my country it's that too I would say there are poor people too but now u still can have cheap builds with intel so I don't see this as an excuse . But hey no wrong done buy what u like its your money and a semi free world.:toast: where u from neway?
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,228 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
In my experience I have always found AMD to either perform really well in a game or not perform well for what it is expected to perform like.

While nVidia generally seems to run well in all games.

^^ I would agree with this - when I did my original comparison the AMD card seemed to either kick ass, or not... Whereas the nvidia would plod along at roughly the same level through games.

I think it also is based on the actual cards, and not so much the manufacturers - maybe the 7800 is just not as good of a design as the 7900, because the reviews of the 7900 show it to be a smooth card.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
1,045 (0.19/day)
Location
Romania
Processor i7-9700
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) msi 1080
Storage Samsung SSD 850 pro 2TB+1tb hdd 7200rpm+ 1tb 970pro
Software Mageia 6 + Windows 10
Another think that it is clear on both players(nvidi/amd)it is that on paper all vga cards are very good, but from paper to real world(i'm from romania btw)...
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
1,002 (0.16/day)
Location
NorCal
System Name Modest Box
Processor i5-4690K @ 4.7 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Z97-C
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory G.Skill Ares DDR3-2400 16GB
Video Card(s) Colorful GTX 950
Storage OCZ Vertex 460A 480GB
Display(s) HP w2558hc
Case Cooler Master Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Gigabyte 750W Gold
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
I had a Sapphire HD 7850 OC and sent it back after a few days. I play mostly RPGs and my most played game at the moment (well - for the last six months!) has been Skyrim. My old GTX 460 1GB @ 875 Mhz was oftentimes smoother...until it ran out of VRAM. The HD 7850 would stutter for a few seconds when I panned the camera in a new zone while the GTX 460 would not. I did a FRAPS run around Windhelm with the Ultra preset and the GTX 460 actually beat it by a few FPS.

I'm sure some of my problem was a 1680x1050 monitor and an X4 980 BE. That was a few months ago and just this past week I finally saved enough money to order a 1920x1200 monitor (ASUS PA248Q) and an ASUS GTX 670. I'm pretty sure even with the Phenom II I'll see a performance boost in games with the much better GPU and higher resolution. Next year I'll be able to build a new PC and can migrate them over.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,758 (0.31/day)
System Name Lailalo
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X Boosts to 4.95Ghz
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus (WIFI
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) XFX 7900XT 20GB
Storage Samsung 970 Pro Plus 1TB, Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper
Power Supply XPG 1000W
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
I had a Sapphire HD 7850 OC and sent it back after a few days. I play mostly RPGs and my most played game at the moment (well - for the last six months!) has been Skyrim. My old GTX 460 1GB @ 875 Mhz was oftentimes smoother...until it ran out of VRAM. The HD 7850 would stutter for a few seconds when I panned the camera in a new zone while the GTX 460 would not. I did a FRAPS run around Windhelm with the Ultra preset and the GTX 460 actually beat it by a few FPS.

I'm sure some of my problem was a 1680x1050 monitor and an X4 980 BE. That was a few months ago and just this past week I finally saved enough money to order a 1920x1200 monitor (ASUS PA248Q) and an ASUS GTX 670. I'm pretty sure even with the Phenom II I'll see a performance boost in games with the much better GPU and higher resolution. Next year I'll be able to build a new PC and can migrate them over.

Shame it wasn't a newer board. Could have SLIed that 460 for pretty cheap. Overall love my little dual 460 setup. Do wish it had more VRAM but performance is great.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,027 (0.24/day)
Location
Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, M
System Name Oldtimer(Always Crunching)
Processor Intel P4 631 @ 3.2 GHz [Stock 3.0 GHz]
Motherboard Intel D945GCPE
Memory 512 MB x2 DDR2 (533MHZ and 366 MHZ)
Storage 160GB Sata1 7200rpm
Display(s) ViewSonic VA703m
Power Supply Normal 450W PSU
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit
+1^
For that
 

Desert Eagle

New Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2012
Messages
70 (0.02/day)
I'm using a GTX 560 Ti right now and it's been a good soldier. I would recommend it to anyone at ~ $220 if you can. I will be upgrading to a GTX 680 after a couple more paychecks (I never buy anything for my rig on credit cards or I would go hog-wild lol) but my GTX 560 Ti has been one of the best cards I've ever owned. :)
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,683 (1.43/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
You mentioned heat problems because the heatsink was rough. It's a diamond card. They like don't even try ever. Not a brand to buy.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
4,815 (0.78/day)
Location
Wangas, New Zealand
System Name Darth Obsidious
Processor Intel i5 2500K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V/Gen3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+ in Push Pull
Memory 2X4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) ASUS R9 270x TOP
Storage 128GB Samsung 830 SSD, 1TB WD Black, 2TB WD Green
Display(s) LG IPS234V-PN
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Infrasonic Quartet
Power Supply Corsair HX650w
Software Windows 7 64bit and Windows XP Home
Benchmark Scores 2cm mark on bench with a razor blade.
^^ I would agree with this - when I did my original comparison the AMD card seemed to either kick ass, or not... Whereas the nvidia would plod along at roughly the same level through games.

I think it also is based on the actual cards, and not so much the manufacturers - maybe the 7800 is just not as good of a design as the 7900, because the reviews of the 7900 show it to be a smooth card.

I noticed this issue first time back in the X19xx days.
I went from a 7600GS 256mb AGP to an X1950pro 512mb AGP.
Some games showed vast overall improvement while others stuttered even though it had high fps.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
1,246 (0.20/day)
Location
Repentigny, QC, CANADA
System Name CTG Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Motherboard Asrock B650M PRO RS WIFI
Cooling Thermalright PA120 SE
Memory 2x 16gb G.SKILL F5-6000J3038F16GX2-FX5
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX6800XT Gaming OC
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) MAG274QRF-QD | Asus vg248qe
Case SAMA IM01
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlasterx G6
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Logitech G pro Wireless
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB MK2
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
Never noticed any stutter with a single GPU, which a slower card would be smoother that a faster card.

if I compare my old 8800GT 512mb with my HD4870 1gb, there is just no word to say, the HD4870 was just faster, like my old 7600GT vmod then + SLI, is nothing compare to my x1950xt 256mb, except that it was a barbecue :D

My HD6950 is just freaking good for the price I paid over a year ago (209$ brand new), and I never noticed stutter.. just changing monitor sometimes, one can be bad at gaming with high FPS, because the MS the monitor is rated, is maybe not right, I don't know. My old 205BW is just crapy if I compare to my VE228H, when gaming.

Anyway, my opinion, you get the card that is right for you. If one doesn't work well for you, don't keep it.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
5,123 (0.95/day)
Location
North of Germany
System Name Nexus PC
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3, 3600 MHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H97-HD3
Cooling Thermalright Macho V2
Memory 24GB DDR3, 1400MHZ CL8
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage Samsung EVO 960 250gb, EVO 850 250gb, Vertex 3 128gb. 2 TB of Rotational.
Display(s) 1xAsus MX299, 2x Asus MX239, Oculus Rift CV1
Case Sunflower Tower
Audio Device(s) C-Media CMI8738/C3DX
Power Supply Corsair TX850
Mouse Cyborg R.A.T. 7
Software Win7 64Bit Ultimate
I wonder, why none of the "Big" Members has written any comment to this :rolleyes:
 

3design

New Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
28 (0.01/day)
System Name CM Storm Workstation
Processor Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz
Motherboard Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - X79 Series
Cooling 7 x 120mm XIGMATEK F1256 Fans + Zalman CNPS20LQ Liquid Heatsink
Memory 32GB~ CORSAIR VENGEANCE
Video Card(s) GPU01 - Ati Firepro v7900 Series (2GB) | GPU02 - Sapphire HD 7970 GHz (3GB)
Storage 2 x Crucial M4 - 256GB | 1 x HotSwap Crucial M4 - 128GB
Display(s) 3 x ASUS VE247H
Case CM STORM TROOPER
Power Supply Corsair HX1050 (1050W)
Software 2 x Windows 7 Pro (64-Bit)
Seriously, that is why I always consider MSI / ASUS / XFX / Sapphire / Zotac / EVGA. These brand are better, professional and straight with quality assurance.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,884 (0.76/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Seriously, that is why I always consider MSI / ASUS / XFX / Sapphire / Zotac / EVGA. These brand are better, professional and straight with quality assurance.
If you go AMD on a budget, HIS is not bad, at the very lease we generally don't get any quality issues with them.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,683 (1.43/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
If you go AMD on a budget, HIS is not bad, at the very lease we generally don't get any quality issues with them.

...and avoid diamond unless you like the risk of a possible rough heatsink or something worse...
 

rectifryer

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44 (0.01/day)
Something as ambiguous as this would probably be more of an issue of driver development and optimization of a game for a certain architecture. Personally, I don't experience any stuttering with the nvidia 330m with moderate settings or a single 5850 in D3 maxed out. Silly comparison IMO.
 
Top