• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GeForce GTX 660 Arrives Mid-August: Report

Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
456 (0.06/day)
System Name Mr. Obsolete| Ms. Old
Processor Intel Core i5 3570K | Intel Core i7 6700
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-I Deluxe | Asus Maximus VIII Gene
Cooling DeepCool GAMMAXX 120 | Coolermaster i7C
Memory Kingston HyperX 1866 16GB (8x2) | Kingston HyperX 2400 16GB (8x2)
Video Card(s) Asus TUF GTX 1650 Super | Asus ROG Strix GTX 1050Ti
Storage Intel 330 180GB + WD Blue 1TB | ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB + WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) ASUS VZ239HE | ASUS VZ239HR
Case Silverstone SG13B | Silverstone PS15B
Audio Device(s) On-Board Realtek ALC898 + Sound Blaster X-Fi MB3 | ROG SupremeFX 2015 + Sound Blaster X-Fi MB3
Power Supply FSP SFX PRO 450 | Seasonic S12-III 500
Software Windows 10 Home
"and a 192-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 1.5 GB of memory, according to the report. The new GPU could capture a crucial sub-$300 price-point"

Ahuh.... So theoretically how will this fare with a 256-bit 7870 (more or less of the same price) or even with a 256-bit 7850 (which is of course cheaper)? :confused:
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,209 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
"and a 192-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 1.5 GB of memory, according to the report. The new GPU could capture a crucial sub-$300 price-point"

Ahuh.... So theoretically how will this fare with a 256-bit 7870 (more or less of the same price) or even with a 256-bit 7850 (which is of course cheaper)? :confused:

It might spank them, or it might be the same speed. But I can guarantee that the series is aimed at the 7870 and 7850 so it definitely won't be slower.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.50/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
I agree it can be nearly anything. But unless they use some absurdingly low clocks, I can't think of it being more than 25% slower than the 680 since it'll have exactly 25% of the chip disabled and it never scales linearly with this kind of architecture, I mean the 670 shows exactly the opposite. How much of that non-linearity is shared by the 660 is impossible to determine right now, but common sense says an architecture doesn't go from a situation where linearity is completely lacking to absolute linearity in just one more disabled cluster. So if I had to say something, I'd say it will offer 80% the performance of the 680.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.12/day)
Speculating about "profit margins" based on die size is pointless to say the least. Fact is the market demands mid-range competition to see higher sales for both companies. PERIOD!!
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.12/day)
Why? Because they make mid end graphics cards that perform par or better than AMD's high end? better efficiency too and cheaper than AMD at launch? I think it's big plus for me as a consumer.

People on this forum seem to be disconnected from reality. A $400 GTX 670 is NOT a mid-range card. Neither is a $400 GTS 630 or $400 GT 610. It's still a $400 rose by any other name. Releasing a $1000 EXTREME!! card months before there midrange is the real show of competence. :shadedshu
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
456 (0.06/day)
System Name Mr. Obsolete| Ms. Old
Processor Intel Core i5 3570K | Intel Core i7 6700
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-I Deluxe | Asus Maximus VIII Gene
Cooling DeepCool GAMMAXX 120 | Coolermaster i7C
Memory Kingston HyperX 1866 16GB (8x2) | Kingston HyperX 2400 16GB (8x2)
Video Card(s) Asus TUF GTX 1650 Super | Asus ROG Strix GTX 1050Ti
Storage Intel 330 180GB + WD Blue 1TB | ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB + WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) ASUS VZ239HE | ASUS VZ239HR
Case Silverstone SG13B | Silverstone PS15B
Audio Device(s) On-Board Realtek ALC898 + Sound Blaster X-Fi MB3 | ROG SupremeFX 2015 + Sound Blaster X-Fi MB3
Power Supply FSP SFX PRO 450 | Seasonic S12-III 500
Software Windows 10 Home
It might spank them, or it might be the same speed. But I can guarantee that the series is aimed at the 7870 and 7850 so it definitely won't be slower.

Hope it beats the 7870 or at least be at par with it but more power efficient then this will be winner... Otherwise, it's going to be a matter of brand loyalty I guess... :D
 

Wrigleyvillain

PTFO or GTFO
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
7,702 (1.28/day)
Location
Chicago
System Name DarkStar
Processor i5 3570K 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 3
Cooling Apogee HD White/XSPC Razer blocks
Memory 8GB Samsung Green 1600
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 670 4GB
Storage 2 x 120GB Samsung 830
Display(s) 27" QNIX
Case Enthoo Pro
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum 760
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard Ducky Pro MX Black
Software Windows 8.1 x64
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
137 (0.03/day)
Location
Cheonan, South Korea
System Name Youtube Machine | Jellyfin Server | Not so retro PC
Processor Ryzen 5 5600X | Athlon 200GE | Athlon X2 270
Motherboard B550M DS3H | A320 Pro-VD/S | N68S-UCC
Cooling Hyper 212 Turbo | Stock Ryzen 5 cooler | Stock
Memory 32GB Klevv 3600mhz | 16GB Team 2666mhz | 2GB DDR2 800
Video Card(s) RX 6600 Eagle | Vega whatever igp | HD 7770
Storage 2x SX8200Pro 512gb | 8TB of scavenged HDDs | 1tb laptop hdd
Display(s) rmmnt30hfcw + S24F350
Case CM Q300L | Old Pentium 4 PC Case | old case
Power Supply PA-5B1B | S12III | 1stplayer "80+" time bomb
Mouse Loigtech G502
Keyboard Corsair Strafe | $8 wireless MK combo
Software Win11 | OMV | WinXP
Benchmark Scores I don't like Gigabyte
People on this forum seem to be disconnected from reality. A $400 GTX 670 is NOT a mid-range card. Neither is a $400 GTS 630 or $400 GT 610. It's still a $400 rose by any other name. Releasing a $1000 EXTREME!! card months before there midrange is the real show of competence. :shadedshu

GTX 670 is not a mid-range card considering its performance, but it uses mid-range kepler GPU since 104 means nvidia's mid-range chip. About my post that saying mid end graphics card, I'm sorry, it's my bad. What I mean is mid-end gpu.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,884 (0.76/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
GTX 670 is not a mid-range card considering it's performance, but it uses mid-range kepler GPU since 104 means nvidia's mid-range chip.
That is all just speculation :rolleyes:
The fact that there is no GK100 but a GK110 suggests that it is meant for the GTX700 series from the beginning ;)
That or it is simply a matter of fact that the 28nm process is simply not ready for a GK100 so they scraped it.

Regardless the GK104 is the highest end Kepler nVidia has right now and that is a fact.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
137 (0.03/day)
Location
Cheonan, South Korea
System Name Youtube Machine | Jellyfin Server | Not so retro PC
Processor Ryzen 5 5600X | Athlon 200GE | Athlon X2 270
Motherboard B550M DS3H | A320 Pro-VD/S | N68S-UCC
Cooling Hyper 212 Turbo | Stock Ryzen 5 cooler | Stock
Memory 32GB Klevv 3600mhz | 16GB Team 2666mhz | 2GB DDR2 800
Video Card(s) RX 6600 Eagle | Vega whatever igp | HD 7770
Storage 2x SX8200Pro 512gb | 8TB of scavenged HDDs | 1tb laptop hdd
Display(s) rmmnt30hfcw + S24F350
Case CM Q300L | Old Pentium 4 PC Case | old case
Power Supply PA-5B1B | S12III | 1stplayer "80+" time bomb
Mouse Loigtech G502
Keyboard Corsair Strafe | $8 wireless MK combo
Software Win11 | OMV | WinXP
Benchmark Scores I don't like Gigabyte
That is all just speculation :rolleyes:
The fact that there is no GK100 but a GK110 suggests that it is meant for the GTX700 series from the beginning ;)
That or it is simply a matter of fact that the 28nm process is simply not ready for a GK100 so they scraped it.

Regardless the GK104 is the highest end Kepler nVidia has right now and that is a fact.

yes you're right, it's just my speculation based on anandtech's review that comparing GK104 with the GF104, which I think they try to compare it with same level chip from previous generation.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.50/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
Speculating about "profit margins" based on die size is pointless to say the least. Fact is the market demands mid-range competition to see higher sales for both companies. PERIOD!!

The market might demand whatever it wants, it cannot get it regardless. Mid-range and low-end are demanded by the largest amount of people and as such are usually the largest markets by revenue, especially mid-range, because nice ASP meets high volumes of sales. Flash news, there's a wafer start shortage!! They cannot sell 1 million cards of any type even if there is a market demand for them. They are going to sell a limited amount of cards whether these cost $500 or $100 and because of that they only offered the $500 card first. Bussiness wise Nvidia made the best thing for Nvidia.

And I hope your comment about die size was not related to my post, because I didn't say such a thing. I said quite the opposite in fact. The thing is GK104 cards are way cheaper to produce based on everything, simpler PCB, less memory modules, simpler PWM, components... especially the 670. And of course die size. Whoever thinks that a sub-300 mm^2 chip (15% smaller than GF104!!!), in a cheap 256 bit card, was Nvidia's biggest contender this round, is completely deluded.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
9,762 (1.91/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel Xeon X3470
Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. P55A-UD3R (Socket 1156)
Cooling Enermax ETS-T40F
Memory Samsung 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3
Video Card(s) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Storage V-GEN03AS18EU120GB, Seagate 2 x 1TB and Seagate 4TB
Display(s) Samsung 21 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case Icute Super 18
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply Silverstone 600 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Sades Excalibur + Taihao keycaps
Software Win 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
why dont they make the GPU like this

im afraid crushing the die if i use aftermarket cooler
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
329 (0.08/day)
Location
Malaysia
System Name Elmo
Processor i9 7900x
Motherboard MSI x299 gaming pro ac
Cooling Noctua NH D-14
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP Extreme RTX 2070 Super
Storage 1TB Samsung 860 Evo, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB, 1 & 2TB Barracuda, Hyperx 120GB, WD Green 500GB
Display(s) Samsung 23" led 1080p X 3
Case Nzxt Switch 810
Power Supply Corsair HX 750W
Software Windows 10 Pro
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
929 (0.18/day)
System Name Desktop | Laptop
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Intel Core i7 7700HQ
Motherboard MAG X570S Torpedo Max| Neptune KLS HM175
Cooling Corsair H100x | Twin fan, fin stack & heat pipes
Memory 32GB G.Skill F4-3600C16-8GVK @ 3600MHz / 16-16-16-36-1T | 16GB DDR4 @ 2400MHz / 17-17-17-39-2T
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra | GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB + Kingston KC3000 2TB + Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) 32" Dell G3223Q (2160p @ 144Hz) | 17" IPS 1920x1080P
Case Fractal Meshify 2 Compact | Aspire V Nitro BE
Audio Device(s) ifi Audio ZEN DAC V2 + Focal Radiance / HyperX Solocast
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex V Platinum Pro 1000W | 150W
Mouse Razer Viper Ultimate | Logitech MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Razer Huntsman V2 Optical (Linear Red)
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
These are to be "sub-$300 parts? offering, 192-Bit with only 1.5 Gb?
1.5GB at this time 192bit shame on you Nvidia, why do you let people down?

Dunno why people are so concerned about only 1.5GB VRAM on a 192-bit bus. My GTX 470 has a 320-bit bus, and only achieves 136GB/s @ 850MHz. If nVidia were to clock the GTX 660's memory at, at least 1250MHz on 192-bit (maybe approaching 125-130GB/s with 1500MHz), I'm sure it will have more than enough bandwidth.

What I am trying to get at, is that, even with a higher memory clock providing more bandwidth, my frame rate didn't show much of an improvement - as I'm sure bandwidth ain't everything (well, at least it isn't for me, at 1920x1080). And as for the VRAM capacity, 1.5GB should satisfy the card just fine. My 1280MB does just fine, and I can run pretty much every game maxed out.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,027 (0.24/day)
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor AMD 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI x670e Tomahawk wifi
Cooling Artic Freezer II 360
Memory G.Skill 32gb ddr5 6000mhz
Video Card(s) AMD 7900XTX 24 GB
Storage Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
Display(s) Alienware 3420DW 120 Freesync
Case LianLi Lancool III white non-rgb
Audio Device(s) Onboard ALC
Power Supply Corsair Shift 1000W
Mouse G502 Hero
Keyboard Ducky Shine 5
Software Win 11 64bit
Benchmark Scores The second best!
I think the GTX 660 is arriving late due to overabundance of unsold 560 series variants and nvidia's hope to clear the channels as much as possible.

I am eager to learn how it shapes up against the 7800 series.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.50/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
http://videocardz.com/33874/geforce-gts-650-is-3-faster-than-gts-550-ti

I'm starting to believe that the 660 might be based on GK106 after all, but it's not what everyone thought it was. That or GK106 was scrapped altogether which makes very little sense to me.

My little new theory is that GK106 took longer because it was slightly redesigned when GK100 was scrapped and GK104 took the high-end card position, in order to be able to compete in the performance class*. Early rumors speculated about GK106 being a 768 SP card, basically 2 clusters where GK104 has 4, with 2 SMX each. And it was always rumored to be a 192 bit part. Basically folowing the tradition set with fermi cards, fair enough, it made sense.

But now I think that GK106 might use the same clusters as GK110, with 3 SMX each for a total of 6, which would turn it into a 1152 SP, 192 bit chip. Exactly what rumors say for GTX660.

Like I said the alternative is that GK106 won't be released and that makes no sense to me. But with GK107 + GDDR5 taking the GTS650 name, it looks very very unlikely for it to exist if GTX660 is based on GK104 too. Yeah non Ti 660 being GK106, but only 1 SKu based on the chip is unlikely too: the non-ti 660 theory has always been supported by harvested GK106 being the 650.

Well at least August will be interesting I guess.

* You just cannot compete if your mid-range/performace GPU is half the size of your high-end. It's been half a decade since the second chip offers at least 2/3 the performance, often time 3/4. Going straight to 1/2 is suicide. Of course GK104 was THAT chip, just like GF104 and G94 senved that purpose, but since GK104 became the one to go in high-end cards a new such chip is required. IMO a 6 SMX GK106 would be it. It's good balanced, it doen't require a lot of reworking because the 3 SMX designed was already tested for GK100/110 and packing them in just 2 clusters saves a lot of space. Only "sacrifice" is geometry/tesselation compared to GK104, but that's irrelevant for mid-range because of this:



It would still beat a GTX580 on pure tesselation.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,027 (0.24/day)
Location
Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, M
System Name Oldtimer(Always Crunching)
Processor Intel P4 631 @ 3.2 GHz [Stock 3.0 GHz]
Motherboard Intel D945GCPE
Memory 512 MB x2 DDR2 (533MHZ and 366 MHZ)
Storage 160GB Sata1 7200rpm
Display(s) ViewSonic VA703m
Power Supply Normal 450W PSU
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit
Is it is better then GTX 560ti 448 or hd 7850

EDIT: Wait i thought the GTX 660ti is going to release in the mid-august not the GTX 660+
Well i think the GTX 660 is better then HD 7850 and the GTX 660ti is better then hd 7870 and some where below the hd 7950
 
Last edited:

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,944 (2.61/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
3,842 (0.62/day)
Location
Maryland
System Name HAL
Processor Core i9 13900k @5.8-6.1
Motherboard Z790 Arous master
Cooling EKWB Quantum Velocity V2 & (2) 360 Corsair XR7 Rads push/pull
Memory 2x 32GB (64GB) Gskill trident 6000 CL30 @28 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 Gigagbyte gaming OC @ +200/1300
Storage (M2's) 2x Samsung 980 pro 2TB, 1xWD Black 2TB, 1x SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Display(s) 65" LG OLED 120HZ
Case Lian Li dyanmic Evo11 with distro plate
Power Supply Thermaltake 1350
Software Microsoft Windows 11 x64
I bet it's going to be a sweet card.. 1.5 gig is a nice place to be in memory for a "mid range" card..
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,944 (2.61/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
I bet it's going to be a sweet card.. 1.5 gig is a nice place to be in memory for a "mid range" card..

GTX680/670 should have 4GB and then the GTX660ti etc should have 2GB. that sounds a bit better i think
 

INSTG8R

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
7,955 (1.13/day)
Location
Canuck in Norway
System Name Hellbox 5.1(same case new guts)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI X570S MAG Torpedo Max
Cooling TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)EK Velocity CPU Block/Noctua EK Quantum DDC Pump/Res
Memory 2x16GB Gskill Trident Neo Z 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor Hellhound 7900XTX
Storage 970 Evo Plus 500GB 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue Corsair MP600 Core 2TB
Display(s) Alienware QD-OLED 34” 3440x1440 144hz 10Bit VESA HDR 400
Case TT Kandalf L.C.S.
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic TX~’850 Platinum
Mouse G502 Hero
Keyboard G19s
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
Software Win 10 Pro x64
GTX680/670 should have 4GB and then the GTX660ti etc should have 2GB. that sounds a bit better i think

Agreed. AMD have no problem with plenty of RAM.
 

shaglocc

New Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2012
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Hmm

Maybe Nvidia is going to wait till they drop prices of the 680 and 670 before they come out with the 660 so they can lessen the gap in the price range and sell the 660 at a 200-250 price range because a 560ti still cost $200+ they might drop price of 560 ti and replace the 560ti price range with the 660 and that opens a gapp to slap a 660ti in for 50-100 dollars more. Just a theory
 

INSTG8R

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
7,955 (1.13/day)
Location
Canuck in Norway
System Name Hellbox 5.1(same case new guts)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI X570S MAG Torpedo Max
Cooling TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)EK Velocity CPU Block/Noctua EK Quantum DDC Pump/Res
Memory 2x16GB Gskill Trident Neo Z 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor Hellhound 7900XTX
Storage 970 Evo Plus 500GB 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue Corsair MP600 Core 2TB
Display(s) Alienware QD-OLED 34” 3440x1440 144hz 10Bit VESA HDR 400
Case TT Kandalf L.C.S.
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic TX~’850 Platinum
Mouse G502 Hero
Keyboard G19s
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
Software Win 10 Pro x64



Did you even look at that graph??

How in the hell am I expected to believe a 7870 has better tessellation than a 7970??:wtf:
Kinda calls the rest of that graphs accuracy into question...
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.50/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
Top