- Joined
- Jul 2, 2008
- Messages
- 8,069 (1.40/day)
- Location
- Hillsboro, OR
System Name | Main/DC |
---|---|
Processor | i7-3770K/i7-2600K |
Motherboard | MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3 |
Cooling | Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80 |
Memory | Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770 |
Storage | Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died) |
Display(s) | Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940 |
Case | P100/Antec P280 It's huge! |
Audio Device(s) | on board |
Power Supply | SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2 |
Software | Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit |
Yes, these are the controversial SSD's that may not perform like the samples that PNY sent to reviewers, but they do meet the specifications listed by PNY. Some are calling for a boycott of these and the Kingston V300 series (the 120GB is $55). I see it as a case of "bad form" for PNY and Kingston to send out samples that represented the best that these economy SSD's had to offer and did not mention that what the buyer gets will be from a random selection that meets the specs.
Link
Link
Last edited: