- Joined
- Feb 7, 2006
- Messages
- 738 (0.11/day)
- Location
- Austin, TX
System Name | WAZAAM! |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 3900x |
Motherboard | ASRock Fatal1ty X370 Pro Gaming |
Cooling | Kraken x62 |
Memory | G.Skill 16GB 3200 MHz |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB SC |
Storage | Micron 9200 Max |
Display(s) | Samsung 49" 5120x1440 120hz |
Case | Corsair 600D |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard - Bose Companion 2 Speakers |
Power Supply | CORSAIR Professional Series HX850 |
Keyboard | Corsair K95 RGB |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
My current rig is a couple years and a half old now. I built this baby from scratch, learning a few things along the way.
CPU - Athlon64 3200+ (Venice Core, Socket 939, 512k L2 cache, 2.0 GHz)
RAM - G.Skill 2x512 DDR400 (2-2-2-5-1t)
GPU - Nvidia 7600GT
MoBo - Asus A8N5X
HDD - (4x SATA: 2x250GB, 1x 100GB, 1x400GB)
Case - Antec Sonata II (With Smart Power 450w PSU)
This system overclocked well. The processor reached 2.5 GHz and was prime stable. The RAM hit DDR500 and was MemTest stable. (All this on a non-enthusiast Motherboard).
After a few months (and a few builds for friends), I found that I should have chosen a processor with 1mb L2 cache. Benchmarks don't show much of what this does for you; but real world experience says much--more L2 cache is a good thing. I won't make this mistake again.
Also, 1 GB of memory is not enough. I thought at the time that it was. I was wrong. At one point I added a couple more sticks of 512mb that I had lying around, bringing the total to 2gb, but my system was slower (the additional RAM was Corsair ValueSelect 2.5-4-4-something large).
Well, now I'm upgrading my system. I think I've done well, I've paid attention to the lessons learned. RAM and L2 cache are good.
MotherBoard - DFI Lanparty 790FX M2RS
Memory - 2x2GB G.Skill DDR2 1000 (5-5-5-15)
Processor - AMD Opteron 1220 (AM2, 2x1mb L2, 2.8Ghz, Santa Ana core)
The processor was a toughy to pick. I needed something that my current power supply can handle (the Opteron is only 103w whereas the non-overclocked Athlon64 is 67w) while still being quick.
I recognize the differences between the Windsor cores and the SantaAnas. I don't know that I made the right choice, but the choice is made. (Brisbane was not a contendor with only 2x512k L2 cache. Also, the advantages to QuadCore are too minute to make me get one.)
I do not do a lot of gaming (some. Oblivion and BF2). The games I play are 'older' and I've been happy with the graphics, just not performance. I'm not going to upgrade the video card (I've no reason to).
I run WindowsXP pro (32bit). I'm not upgrading this. I'm in the process of switching to using a Linux distro as my primary boot system, using Windows for iTunes, Games and JMP.
Knowing all of this, what do you think of my choices?
I plan on overclocking and posting results here (It is ****ed hard to find OC results for the 1220).
Almost forgot. My choices for motherboard were the one I chose and the MSI K9A2 Platinum. But the DFI has a much better rating on NewEgg (5 eggs) whereas many people complain about the OCing properties of the MSI board (3 eggs).
Lastly, many of my choices were predicated by price. I already spent more than I planned. So if you have a suggestion that would have cost me more, just don't make it please.
TheEldest
UPDATE:
I've had the new parts for more than a month now.
OCing did not go well (but I think I know why).
I cannot get an ounce over 3GHz out of the processor. If I up the volts, it just doesn't work. I never get to a point where I fail Prime or SuperPi, the computer just won't boot up. It restarts.
The temps never get high. From past experience, you can see the temps rise drastically as you get closer to the maximum overclock. I don't see that, it just stays at the same temps. (54 at load, 34 at Idle (It's warm in this Texas Apartment)).
I think the problem is the power supply. It's an Antec SmartPower 450W. It's about 2.5 years old.
I have 4 HDDs, 2 Optical Drives, a 7600GT and the new processor and MB (4GB RAM; Opteron 1220). The old processor was rated around 67Watts, the new one is 103Watts.
Anyone care to agree or disagree with my prognosis?
As an aside: Assuming it's the PSU, I don't really care. It does fine at 3GHz. I plan on replacing it in the future, just not right now. (I really want the new Antec Lifestyle Sonata III, I have the II)
CPU - Athlon64 3200+ (Venice Core, Socket 939, 512k L2 cache, 2.0 GHz)
RAM - G.Skill 2x512 DDR400 (2-2-2-5-1t)
GPU - Nvidia 7600GT
MoBo - Asus A8N5X
HDD - (4x SATA: 2x250GB, 1x 100GB, 1x400GB)
Case - Antec Sonata II (With Smart Power 450w PSU)
This system overclocked well. The processor reached 2.5 GHz and was prime stable. The RAM hit DDR500 and was MemTest stable. (All this on a non-enthusiast Motherboard).
After a few months (and a few builds for friends), I found that I should have chosen a processor with 1mb L2 cache. Benchmarks don't show much of what this does for you; but real world experience says much--more L2 cache is a good thing. I won't make this mistake again.
Also, 1 GB of memory is not enough. I thought at the time that it was. I was wrong. At one point I added a couple more sticks of 512mb that I had lying around, bringing the total to 2gb, but my system was slower (the additional RAM was Corsair ValueSelect 2.5-4-4-something large).
Well, now I'm upgrading my system. I think I've done well, I've paid attention to the lessons learned. RAM and L2 cache are good.
MotherBoard - DFI Lanparty 790FX M2RS
Memory - 2x2GB G.Skill DDR2 1000 (5-5-5-15)
Processor - AMD Opteron 1220 (AM2, 2x1mb L2, 2.8Ghz, Santa Ana core)
The processor was a toughy to pick. I needed something that my current power supply can handle (the Opteron is only 103w whereas the non-overclocked Athlon64 is 67w) while still being quick.
I recognize the differences between the Windsor cores and the SantaAnas. I don't know that I made the right choice, but the choice is made. (Brisbane was not a contendor with only 2x512k L2 cache. Also, the advantages to QuadCore are too minute to make me get one.)
I do not do a lot of gaming (some. Oblivion and BF2). The games I play are 'older' and I've been happy with the graphics, just not performance. I'm not going to upgrade the video card (I've no reason to).
I run WindowsXP pro (32bit). I'm not upgrading this. I'm in the process of switching to using a Linux distro as my primary boot system, using Windows for iTunes, Games and JMP.
Knowing all of this, what do you think of my choices?
I plan on overclocking and posting results here (It is ****ed hard to find OC results for the 1220).
Almost forgot. My choices for motherboard were the one I chose and the MSI K9A2 Platinum. But the DFI has a much better rating on NewEgg (5 eggs) whereas many people complain about the OCing properties of the MSI board (3 eggs).
Lastly, many of my choices were predicated by price. I already spent more than I planned. So if you have a suggestion that would have cost me more, just don't make it please.
TheEldest
UPDATE:
I've had the new parts for more than a month now.
OCing did not go well (but I think I know why).
I cannot get an ounce over 3GHz out of the processor. If I up the volts, it just doesn't work. I never get to a point where I fail Prime or SuperPi, the computer just won't boot up. It restarts.
The temps never get high. From past experience, you can see the temps rise drastically as you get closer to the maximum overclock. I don't see that, it just stays at the same temps. (54 at load, 34 at Idle (It's warm in this Texas Apartment)).
I think the problem is the power supply. It's an Antec SmartPower 450W. It's about 2.5 years old.
I have 4 HDDs, 2 Optical Drives, a 7600GT and the new processor and MB (4GB RAM; Opteron 1220). The old processor was rated around 67Watts, the new one is 103Watts.
Anyone care to agree or disagree with my prognosis?
As an aside: Assuming it's the PSU, I don't really care. It does fine at 3GHz. I plan on replacing it in the future, just not right now. (I really want the new Antec Lifestyle Sonata III, I have the II)
Last edited: