Recent content by ricoh

No, the RTX 3050 has a 33% narrower 128-bit bus than the A2000. But the A2000 has a 50% wider 192-bit bus than the RTX 3050. If the RTX 3050 WOULD have a 50% narrower bus than the A2000, it would have been 96 bit.

@W1zzard Sorry for the late answer. Both the 2nd test build and the 2.14 release build do show the correct clock rates (300 mhz idle / 1000 mhz load) in the realtime sensors tab. Thanks for the fixes.

@W1zzard Thanks for the test build, the clocks on the main page are now correct (realtime sensors still @ 4250 mhz)

...and the sensors page does show exactly 1/3 of that register value, no matter if load or idle.

Nope, only the Intel iGPU, no secondary GPU. Noticed this behaviour for a few weeks now, so the misreading doesn't seem to be related to OS build, driver release or GPU-Z build.

HP Elitebook 830 G5 - Bios 1.04

1. When saving the VBios on a GTX 670 with official UEFI support, the file GPU-Z produces is bit-identical to the original file, no problem there. When saving the VBios on a GTX 470 with legacy bios support only, the file GPU-Z produces is bit-identical to the original file, also no problem...

Hyper-V is known to cause this behaviour.

As was already said, Linux Mint. All three commands in the first post can be done via GUI in Mint.

Hi W1zzard, Imo GPU-Z is missing an important information nowadays: single precision FLOPS/s. While there's fillrates and bandwidth, GPU-Z provides no information about the computational power. That just came to my mind when i compared a higher-clocked 9600 GT vs a lower-clocked 9800 GT that...

Just go with the supported DX level of the hardware, so 12.0 or 12.1, no need for SM. And i also see no need for "OS supported", GPU-Z is about the HW not the SW.

Yes, it's fixed now and working fine, thanks for the update. It's like a completly new feature for me as i've never "installed" GPU-Z before, and the differently colored bars for Perfcap Reason are great. :thumbsup:

PCGH has measured these chips without heatspreader: G80 (90nm): 486,5 mm² (21,7 mm x 22,42 mm) GT200 (65nm): 606,9 mm² (24,77 mm x 24,5 mm) GT200b (55n): 497,3 mm² (22,3 mm x 22,3 mm)...

Hi W1zzard, i've recently bios modded a GTX 285 into a Quadro FX 5800, and noticed there's a difference in reported Die Size: Google gives me results for both sizes, so which one is correct? Second thing is the same problem as in this thread...