Recent content by xsever

Yeah it said that in the article.

FYI "cost-effective" in the article means "cheap"

Price and how does it compare to a Core Contact Freezer?

If e-banking stops working because of the browser's version number, then there are some issue with that e-banking system. The security certificates should not expire like that!

The menu bar can be easily re-enabled in firefox. Just hold ALT.

I am not really getting people's fuss about the way Mozilla is going with the version numbers. Who cares if they are jumping version numbers in integers or going in 0.001 increments! What matters is that the browser is not getting worse! Whether it's called 3.6.10 or 6.1, it's still performing.

No problemo! I am running Firefox 8 Nigthly builds and man it's fast. It uses 30% less RAM than Firefox 6 apparently.

For those complaining about add-ons compatability, download Nightly Tester Tools add-on until your add-ons are supported.

1372 @ 7-7-7-20 1T proved to be a tad slower than 1648 9-9-9-24 2T. CPU/NB at 2200. I tried 1648 8-8-8-24 2T with 1.65V but the BIOS would display boot failure and force me to revert. I think this concludes my journey for now.

I raised the FSB from 200 to 206 so the CPU now runs at 4.12GHz (1.376V) and RAM now runs at 1648 9-9-9-24 1.5V. Here are the results: I am going to try 1372 @ 7-7-7-20 1T and see if it's better than 1648 9-9-9-24 2T.

The BIOS won't post with NB @ 2600 1.25V and RAM @ 1600 8-8-8-21 and 1.610V. I tried many times and had to clear the CMOS each time.

These are old tests. I just got back home and I am going to get started now. Going for 8-8-8-21 first @ 1600.

Here are my results: 1333 @ 7-7-7-21 and NB @2200 1600 @ 9-9-9-24 and NB @2200

Thanks for all the information you provided. I will keep the thread updated with my tests.

Why so?