- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 628 (0.11/day)
- Location
- Finland (northern)
System Name | Getting old! |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3,9Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-UD4H |
Cooling | About sufficient air cooling |
Memory | 4GB Dominator DDR2 1066 @1040Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Club 3D Radeon HD6950 1GB |
Storage | 120GB Kingston SSDNow 200V+, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 |
Display(s) | Crossover 27Q LED-P (lovely!) |
Case | Antec Three Hundred |
Audio Device(s) | Integrated -> optical -> HELIX P DSP |
Power Supply | Corsair HX620W |
Software | Win7 64-bit |
Benchmark Scores | 3DMark11 P5285 WPrime 1.55 10,15 sec Super Pi Mod 1.5 17,920 sec |
Interesting article!
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3506&p=1
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3506&p=1
When it came to actual game play experiences, we thought the Phenom II 940 was clearly the better choice in Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts and Crysis Warhead due to minimum frame rate advantages and fluidity of game play. In the five other titles, we could not tell any real differences in the quality of game play between the Phenom II 940 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Except for Far Cry 2 where we could raise the graphic quality settings without affecting game play, the i7 platform was no different than our two other solutions.