- Joined
- May 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,863 (0.49/day)
- Location
- Brasil
System Name | Sovereign // HTPC |
---|---|
Processor | i7 3770k 4.2 // i7 3770k 4.2 |
Motherboard | Maximus V Gene // Sabertooth Z77 |
Cooling | Noctua D14 // Intel HSF |
Memory | 16GB Samsung // 16GB VengeanceLP |
Video Card(s) | Deciding // 660 DC2 |
Storage | OS (X25-M), Data (Seagate 1TB) // Samsung 840 120GB & bunch of drives |
Display(s) | Samsung T240HD // LG TV |
Case | TJ08e // Grandia GD08 |
Audio Device(s) | DT880 Pro 250 ohm // TV speakers |
Power Supply | Seasonic Plat 1000 // Seasonic Gold 760 |
Software | Windows 8 Pro x64 // Windows 7 Pro x64 |
do not base your thoughts of value in a product on price, that's very poor logic especially when looking at computer hardware. I say that as advise not in an offensive way and sorry if you do take it offensively. but a good example is the q9550 and the q9450. When they were released the q9550 was ~550 bucks but the q9450 was ~3X0 some i believe. was the performance a big enough difference to warrant the 200 dollar difference? HELL NO!!! but as erocker said there are plenty of posts here to help you make a decision so i will move on as you wished erocker gl doug
The thing is that videocards i believe to be the only hardware that the price/performance scalability is right. You say processors and you´re very right as with Corei7 920 and 965 thle last being 3x and you get no substantial more FPS. But with videocards its different, the market is much competitive so that i think they are worth their price, since a gtx295 has more than 40 % gain in performance than a 295 and to me is 38% more expensive, that right there is value. Even being both 300$+ cards.