• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

more cache or faster FSB??

Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
114 (0.02/day)
Location
Philadelphia
HI, i am currently building an older P4 computer just for web browsing and i have two processors... whitch one should i choose? one has more cache and the other has a faster FSB my motherboard supports both fully......
Proc 1: P4 2.8ghz 1mb cache , 533 FSB
Proc 2: P4 2.8 ghz , 512 cache , 800 fsb
 

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
23,310 (3.77/day)
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Icarus Mk.VI
Processor Intel 8600k@Stock -- pending tuning
Motherboard Asus ROG Strixx Z370-F
Cooling CPU: BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro}
Memory 32GB XPG Gammix D10 {2x16GB}
Video Card(s) ASUS Dual Radeon™ RX 6700 XT OC Edition
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 512GB SSD (Boot)|WD SN770 (Gaming)|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300|2x 2TB Crucial BX500
Display(s) LG GP850-B
Case Corsair 760T (White)
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
For web browsing?? it doesnt matter - but IMO more cache is always nice. helps shit load up just a lil bit faster.
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
HI, i am currently building an older P4 computer just for web browsing and i have two processors... whitch one should i choose? one has more cache and the other has a faster FSB my motherboard supports both fully......
Proc 1: P4 2.8ghz 1mb cache , 533 FSB
Proc 2: P4 2.8 ghz , 512 cache , 800 fsb

if we were talking the same architecture, then cache would be the easy guess. However those CPU's are likely very very different internally... please give us the model numbers.

At a guess, the 800Mhz FSB chip will be far newer, and likely superior.


What are you trying to achieve anyway? A pentium 4 is weak by todays standards, and cant do much beyond running windows and older games.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
114 (0.02/day)
Location
Philadelphia
Here are the sspec numbers:
Proc 1: P4 2.8ghz 1mb cache , 533 FSB SSPEC- SL7PK
Proc 2: P4 2.8 ghz , 512 cache , 800 fsb SSPEC- SL6WJ

Also, I will use this computer watching movies and some video editiing ( nothing major), and the mobo is an ABIT IC7
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
114 (0.02/day)
Location
Philadelphia
So in all there will really be no performance difference?
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
114 (0.02/day)
Location
Philadelphia
i see that there are no notes on intel's site saying that the 90nm model has hyperthreading but the older one does.... so does the 90nm support hyperthrading?
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
no, it seems that the 130nm one has HT, and the 90nm doesnt.

Odd that.

seems like there is no clear choice here. They're both enough for non HD content, and neither will be enough for 1080p playback. they're both gunna be slow for video encoding/editing as well.


You cant lose with either one so long as it works, you either get a cooler chip, or hyperthreading.
 

3volvedcombat

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,514 (0.28/day)
Location
South California, The desert.
System Name My Computer
Processor Core 2 Q9550 4Ghz 1.23volts
Motherboard Gigabyte
Cooling Corsair
Memory OCZ
Video Card(s) Galaxy
Storage Western Digital
Display(s) Acer
Case Lian li
Audio Device(s) Asus
Power Supply Corsiar
Software Microsoft
Benchmark Scores 25,000 3dmark06 at 4.35Ghz processor, 835core card!
In this case and most l2cache is way better then the actual FSB.

Id take 2 same clocked chips
and the one with the most l2 cache ill take, because it offers way more performance. l2 cache basically decides performance in most cases and will always do so.

*What cache is in a processor is HYPER FAST memory for the processor to save and remember functions for programs while its running or when you start it.
*Cache prevents the CPU from having to use the system bus for transferring data, once the system bus has to transfer data for the CPU, the CPU is essentially capped by how fast the motherboard is. But the Onboard cache is HYPER FAST compared to the system bus in transferring data between each-other, so having the extra cache on the processor makes it were its way faster then processors with low cache by a CLOCK BY CLOCK standing comparison.


Here is a example.

E5200-2.5GHZ- 2MB of cache 100% of performance. -wolfdale

E8400- "down clocked" 2.5Ghz - 6mb of cache is 130-150% faster at the same clock speed. -wolfdale

there is the potential difference. Cache differences REALLY SHOW in rendering programs to, if that bothers your choice.


****FSB**** Fsb only really matters if your trying to get wider bandwidth with memory, or high clocks with memory itself. Its good to have high FSB processors on lga 775 setups if your going to use ddr3 with the setups because its just better performing, but cache is eventually be the deciding factor because it offers more difference then FSB. :D
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
In this case and most l2cache is way better then the actual FSB.

Id take 2 same clocked chips
and the one with the most l2 cache ill take, because it offers way more performance. l2 cache basically decides performance in most cases and will always do so.

*What cache is in a processor is HYPER FAST memory for the processor to save and remember functions for programs while its running or when you start it.
*Cache prevents the CPU from having to use the system bus for transferring data, once the system bus has to transfer data for the CPU, the CPU is essentially capped by how fast the motherboard is. But the Onboard cache is HYPER FAST compared to the system bus in transferring data between each-other, so having the extra cache on the processor makes it were its way faster then processors with low cache by a CLOCK BY CLOCK standing comparison.


Here is a example.

E5200-2.5GHZ- 2MB of cache 100% of performance. -wolfdale

E8400- "down clocked" 2.5Ghz - 6mb of cache is 130-150% faster at the same clock speed. -wolfdale

there is the potential difference. Cache differences REALLY SHOW in rendering programs to, if that bothers your choice.


****FSB**** Fsb only really matters if your trying to get wider bandwidth with memory, or high clocks with memory itself. Its good to have high FSB processors on lga 775 setups if your going to use ddr3 with the setups because its just better performing, but cache is eventually be the deciding factor because it offers more difference then FSB. :D

an i7 with 2MB of cache is going to whup a pentium 4 with 4MB of cache.

cache only matters directly if they're the same architecture

since ones 130nm and ones 90nm, and one has hyperthreading while the other doesnt... its fair to say that they're different on the inside, in more than just amount of cache.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,731 (3.43/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
I would take the 533FSB one with 1MB cache, then overclock it to 800MHz FSB :)

Err, that's 4.2GHz, probably not possible :eek:
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
I would take the 533FSB one with 1MB cache, then overclock it to 800MHz FSB :)

Err, that's 4.2GHz, probably not possible :eek:

actually, it is. my ex-housemates P4 ran at a nice 4.4Ghz. It was just slow, even at those clocks.
 

Kreij

Senior Monkey Moderator
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
13,817 (2.21/day)
Location
Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
Since you are just going to use it for browsing, I would go with more cache, slower FSB, no HT.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,731 (3.43/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
actually, it is. my ex-housemates P4 ran at a nice 4.4Ghz. It was just slow, even at those clocks.

Not as slow at 2.8GHz :cool:
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
114 (0.02/day)
Location
Philadelphia
would the one with hypertreading make any speen difference? would it make win7 perform any better?
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,731 (3.43/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
It would help in applications that make use of more than one thread, yes.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
114 (0.02/day)
Location
Philadelphia
Thanks for all of the responces!
So witch one would you guys choose. I will just surf the web and watch videos on youtube and maybe emulate some old games. I already have my maxed-out laptop for anything that is power hungry!
Also the os would be win7
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
321 (0.06/day)
System Name i5
Processor Intel Core i5 750 @ 3.2ghz 1.1v
Motherboard MSI P55-GD65
Cooling Deepcool ICEEGDE 400 Ni + Deepcool Rockman
Memory Kingston 12GB DDR3 1333MHz
Video Card(s) Crossfire 2x AMD R9 270 2GB
Storage Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB
Display(s) Acer 22" AL2216W 1680x1050
Case 120mm,140mm,220mm fans.
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD
Power Supply Topower SilentCool 500w
Software Windows 7
try each one and decide. :D
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,731 (3.43/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Take the 533MHz FSB one and overclock it.
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
15,436 (2.43/day)
Location
Mid-Atlantic
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 13600KF
Motherboard AsRock B760M Steel Legend Wifi
Cooling Noctua NH-U9S
Memory 4x 16 Gb Gskill S5 DDR5 @6000
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Gaming OC 6750 XT 12GB
Storage WD_BLACK 4TB SN850x
Display(s) Gigabye M32U
Case Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 P2
Mouse MX Master 3s
Keyboard Logitech G915 Wireless Clicky
Software The Matrix
What are you trying to achieve anyway? A pentium 4 is weak by todays standards, and cant do much beyond running windows and older games.

HI, i am currently building an older P4 computer just for web browsing

as you can see he wont be using it for much.
 

3volvedcombat

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,514 (0.28/day)
Location
South California, The desert.
System Name My Computer
Processor Core 2 Q9550 4Ghz 1.23volts
Motherboard Gigabyte
Cooling Corsair
Memory OCZ
Video Card(s) Galaxy
Storage Western Digital
Display(s) Acer
Case Lian li
Audio Device(s) Asus
Power Supply Corsiar
Software Microsoft
Benchmark Scores 25,000 3dmark06 at 4.35Ghz processor, 835core card!
an i7 with 2MB of cache is going to whup a pentium 4 with 4MB of cache.

cache only matters directly if they're the same architecture

since ones 130nm and ones 90nm, and one has hyperthreading while the other doesnt... its fair to say that they're different on the inside, in more than just amount of cache.

Yes and architecture goes passed cache with processors to, i know this, but he wanted to know l2 cache vs fsb differences comparing Pentium processors.

Architecture can go into account on there different levels of cache and how many cores a processor has to use. What instruction the processor has to use, and the use of memory controllers and nm between transistors meaning the 90nm Pentium will run cooler and probable overclock higher:)laugh:). HT is even more with handedly performance gaining then cache is to a processor. So if a pent has ht but 512kb of l2 cache it is potentially faster then the 1mb l2 cache single core Pentium. But It depends on the programs in this situation. If rendering I believe the HT Pentium will be better, but at gaming and video I belive the 1mb Pentium will be better in that case. It Depends though.

But Most games are using 2 cores, and video's and flash programs are using 2 cores to, its a dual core world so i believe the Pentium with the HT will be perfect right now for stuff like that.
 
D

Deleted member 67555

Guest
Ive had both of those processors and the 800mhz fsb chip blows that other chip away big time...
I still have that 800mhz chip actually..just no mobo for it
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
114 (0.02/day)
Location
Philadelphia
Thanks for all of the responces... i decided to use the 1MB cache processor and everything works great... here are the final specs:
Pentium 4 @ 2.8ghz
1.5GB Ram
(2) 80gb harddrives
abit ic7 mobo
win 7 ultimate
Nvidia GeForce FX5200 128mb
All of this were some spair parts i had laying around^^^:D
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,680 (4.29/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores
Processor 2990WX
Motherboard Asrock X399M
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill 3600
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller
Keyboard Keychron K8
Software W10P
the 130nm one is a northy chip and should clock higher even with the larger die size the prescott based 90nm chip may throw a suprize out there but i would stick to the 533 based northwood and clock it up a little bit
 
Top