• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD ''Barts'' GPU Detailed Specifications Surface

Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
2,820 (0.53/day)
Location
Midwest USA
System Name My Gaming System
Processor Intel i7 4770k @ 4.4 Ghz
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Impact (ITX)
Cooling Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 8 Gb
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ti SC
Storage Samsung SSD EVO 120GB - Samsung SSD EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case Bitfenix Prodigy
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Home Primeum
Well the thing I can't help but notice is that the 5770 has 800 stream Processors.... and this Card (supposedly the "6770") has 300 Shaders.

Now since I don't really get into the lingo of what means what.... I just know what's the most powerful at the time and how to overclock it well :)

I thought that Stream Processors was what ATI/AMD called their Shader cores correct?

If I have that right.... wouldn't this mean that this has to be new architecture? Considering that the old Stream processors were weaker then Nvidias Shader "Cuda" Cores? Now this card only has a number of 300 compared to the 5770's 800?

If I have this understood correctly.... this will be one hell of a series. We might finally be able to adjust Shader clocks on ATI cards too!? I just can't wait to see what we have instore for this generation.

I will tell you what though. Even if this card is meant to go against the GTX 460.... the DX 11 tessellation on these cards compared to Fermi (If the benchmarks are true) look like this series will leave fermi in the dust and now where to be seen.

I will definetly sell my GTX 460's for a pair of these. If not go even higher up the ladder if the price is right

That's not to mention the 960 Shader version of this card. This thing should be crazy as hell! :rockout:

But to someone out there who said that "We could see this card be on the 5870 levels" I hope so for AMD but I hope not for our sake. Because if this is the case.... we are looking at a mid card for $400 buck each and a top card for $1000 grand or more easy.
 

cheezburger

New Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
265 (0.05/day)
System Name no bases
Processor E8400/e5300/qx9770
Motherboard rampage formula/DG41TY/p5q DELUXE
Cooling stock DTC cooler&copper core
Memory titanium XTC DDR2 800 2gbx4/2gbx2/ballistix 2GBx4 DDR2-800
Video Card(s) evga gtx 460 oc/zotac 9600gt amp/evga gtx 580
Storage WD cavior black 2TB 16mb eSATA 2/500gb 16mb ATA133/ OCZSSD2-1ONX32G + samsung 320gb 8mb ESATA
Case cm 690/GZ-x2/antec qaudro 1200w
Power Supply antec quattro 1200w/zumax 500w v2/antec HCG 900w
Software windows server 2008 sp2/windows xp x64 pro sp2c/windows server 2008 sp1
Well, this pretty much confirms the change from the old 5D shaders.
They're probably also bumping the geometry performance, namely DX11 tesselation, along with the new shaders.

Nonetheless, I have no doubt that Bart will be a whole lot smaller than GF104, thus cheaper to produce. Besides, since the HD5830 can be made with a relatively small PCB, I have no doubts this card won't be much bigger than the HD5770.


I do think they could just cut the prices in their current HD5000 line to stupidly low values (their yields should be sky-high by now) while holding off for the 32/28nm process. nVidia's underperforming Fermi architecture would allow them to do that.


i doubt they may just discontinue it rather than keep it around as there would be pointless, a card has poor shader fill rate while having more shader than new series that easily outperform it with less shader/ALU and not even playable when comes tessellation. also the die isn't much smaller/cheaper than northern islands which makes no profit at all as manufacture continues. if a barts can outperform gtx 480 while keep the price around $259~299 will make no room for evergreen. dont expecting evergreen become another g92..

Well the thing I can't help but notice is that the 5770 has 800 stream Processors.... and this Card (supposedly the "6770") has 300 Shaders.

Now since I don't really get into the lingo of what means what.... I just know what's the most powerful at the time and how to overclock it well :)

I thought that Stream Processors was what ATI/AMD called their Shader cores correct?

If I have that right.... wouldn't this mean that this has to be new architecture? Considering that the old Stream processors were weaker then Nvidias Shader "Cuda" Cores? Now this card only has a number of 300 compared to the 5770's 800?

If I have this understood correctly.... this will be one hell of a series. We might finally be able to adjust Shader clocks on ATI cards too!? I just can't wait to see what we have instore for this generation.

I will tell you what though. Even if this card is meant to go against the GTX 460.... the DX 11 tessellation on these cards compared to Fermi (If the benchmarks are true) look like this series will leave fermi in the dust and now where to be seen.

I will definetly sell my GTX 460's for a pair of these. If not go even higher up the ladder if the price is right

That's not to mention the 960 Shader version of this card. This thing should be crazy as hell! :rockout:

But to someone out there who said that "We could see this card be on the 5870 levels" I hope so for AMD but I hope not for our sake. Because if this is the case.... we are looking at a mid card for $400 buck each and a top card for $1000 grand or more easy.

for what i know 4D format is like s core that can send 4 data in one clock, unlike previous design of 5D format that has to divided into 5 small dedicate shader pipeline. this design(4 complexity arrangement) is done by one shader core than split core to do the multiple purpose(4 simple + 1 complex format ). more like GDDR5 but it's in inside of shader core. if it's correct a shader effective data rate would be "core clock x 4" if barts's core frequency is 900mhz than the shader core will run 3.6GT(3600MT) effectively.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
5,392 (0.99/day)
Location
Carrollton, GA
System Name ODIN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling Dark Rock 4
Memory G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s) Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio
Power Supply Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores I don't benchmark.
Well the thing I can't help but notice is that the 5770 has 800 stream Processors.... and this Card (supposedly the "6770") has 300 Shaders.

Now since I don't really get into the lingo of what means what.... I just know what's the most powerful at the time and how to overclock it well :)

I thought that Stream Processors was what ATI/AMD called their Shader cores correct?

If I have that right.... wouldn't this mean that this has to be new architecture? Considering that the old Stream processors were weaker then Nvidias Shader "Cuda" Cores? Now this card only has a number of 300 compared to the 5770's 800?

Everything you said there about the 6770 is completely wrong and I am not sure where you got that number. They 67x0 GPU's to be released soon got double the memory bandwidth, double the ROPs (from 16 to 32), and ~20% more Streaming Processor cores for the XT.

6750 = 800 Streaming Processors 5750 = 720 Streaming Processors
6770 = 960 Streaming Processors 5770 = 800 Streaming Processors
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
1,182 (0.22/day)
Location
CO
System Name 4k
Processor AMD 5800x3D
Motherboard MSI MAG b550m Mortar Wifi
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x8Gb Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 bl8g36c16u4b.m8fe1
Video Card(s) Nvidia Reference 3080Ti
Storage ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) LG 48" C1
Case CORSAIR Carbide AIR 240 Micro-ATX
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar STX
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650W
Software Microsoft Windows10 Pro x64
Well if that number is correct, and they really did move this card to 4way cores that means the 5770 had 160x5 (800) stream processors and this new card will have 300x4 (1200). This card maybe be very well be 6870 and be on par with the 5870 if the numbers are correct.

edit...if the shaders still stay the same 200x4 (800) still a nice bump in performance by keeping the same number of shaders.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
2,820 (0.53/day)
Location
Midwest USA
System Name My Gaming System
Processor Intel i7 4770k @ 4.4 Ghz
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Impact (ITX)
Cooling Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 8 Gb
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ti SC
Storage Samsung SSD EVO 120GB - Samsung SSD EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case Bitfenix Prodigy
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Home Primeum
Everything you said there about the 6770 is completely wrong and I am not sure where you got that number. They 67x0 GPU's to be released soon got double the memory bandwidth, double the ROPs (from 16 to 32), and ~20% more Streaming Processor cores for the XT.

6750 = 800 Streaming Processors 5750 = 720 Streaming Processors
6770 = 960 Streaming Processors 5770 = 800 Streaming Processors

Oops LOL that makes much more sense Sorry it is late here and I wasn't paying that close attention.....

Here is what I saw.....



You see my cuircled red area.... on my screen it looks like 300. That is why I thought something was werid for the next level card down to go from 920 Shader to 300 shaders.

LOL goofy move on my part :banghead:

So nevermind I retract my previous ideas and statements "Blush" :p

Still on another note 32 ROP's 800 to 920 shader's 256 Bit bus..... all looks bad ass to me. Wish I could visualize more what this all meant but after looking at comparable cards and specs today. It seems what others here have been saying might be true. This card could be very close the the 5850/5870 area.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    104.6 KB · Views: 1,104

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Could be that 6770 simply adds 160 more shaders, plus 256-bit bus, and there is no shader change at all. And to me, that would SUCK!!


:laugh:

Wouldn't be much faster than current 4890, with DX11 tacked on.

:eek:

Considering the "competition", there's no reason to expect more than that at all(Uh, based on cypress dual engine, each engine now has one extra cluster, hello?). New shaders might kill 470, even, if clocked high enough, so I think that might be asking to much...but boy, would it ever be nice.
 

cheezburger

New Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
265 (0.05/day)
System Name no bases
Processor E8400/e5300/qx9770
Motherboard rampage formula/DG41TY/p5q DELUXE
Cooling stock DTC cooler&copper core
Memory titanium XTC DDR2 800 2gbx4/2gbx2/ballistix 2GBx4 DDR2-800
Video Card(s) evga gtx 460 oc/zotac 9600gt amp/evga gtx 580
Storage WD cavior black 2TB 16mb eSATA 2/500gb 16mb ATA133/ OCZSSD2-1ONX32G + samsung 320gb 8mb ESATA
Case cm 690/GZ-x2/antec qaudro 1200w
Power Supply antec quattro 1200w/zumax 500w v2/antec HCG 900w
Software windows server 2008 sp2/windows xp x64 pro sp2c/windows server 2008 sp1
Could be that 6770 simply adds 160 more shaders, plus 256-bit bus, and there is no shader change at all. And to me, that would SUCK!!


:laugh:

Wouldn't be much faster than current 4890, with DX11 tacked on.

:eek:

Considering the "competition", there's no reason to expect more than that at all(Uh, based on cypress dual engine, hello?). New shaders might kill 470, even, if clocked high enough, so I think that might be asking to much...but boy, would it ever be nice.

then why would amd gone this far and putting double size of rops/ram bus.....if the shader is still 5D:shadedshu
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Becuase devs have been complaining about that exact thing for some time. If you go back in time, about 5 years, in my "microstutter" posts(yes, been looking at that stuff that long), texture performance(xTexture Memory Units) have been a big issue. One might even suppose that maybe this is why nv's tech excels so greatly, although math performance is much lower than AMD.

I mean, realisticlly this is what makes the most sense. I think when 32nm existed, the shader change was planned, but because they are stuck in 40nm, the changes they can make are limited...higher-order shaders are going to generate more heat in the shader core, but simply enlarging the die size, and adding more shaders, just means you need to provide better overall cooling capacity for the already existing cooler.

This is business, after all, so the biggest impact, with the smallest cost, works best. New shaders migth seem like htey'd cost less, but the dev time costs alot too. Would be far more practical to invest further time in any such changes, and make small, but effective, ones, that increase profits.
 
Last edited:

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.50/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
then why would amd gone this far and putting double size of rops/ram bus.....if the shader is still 5D:shadedshu

They doubled the rops/bus width because the 5770 was already very limited. Regardless of how much more shader/texture performance the new card has 10%, 20%, 50%... a higher rop power was necessary if a tangible improvements was to be seen. AMD is commited to only use widths that are multiples of 2, instead of using intrmediate numbers like Nvidia does so that's why the 256 bit figure comes in, even though it will probably be overkill on these cards. Don't expect Cayman to have more than 256 bits. It wouldn't be the first time in history when a midrange and high-end chips share the bus width...
 

cheezburger

New Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
265 (0.05/day)
System Name no bases
Processor E8400/e5300/qx9770
Motherboard rampage formula/DG41TY/p5q DELUXE
Cooling stock DTC cooler&copper core
Memory titanium XTC DDR2 800 2gbx4/2gbx2/ballistix 2GBx4 DDR2-800
Video Card(s) evga gtx 460 oc/zotac 9600gt amp/evga gtx 580
Storage WD cavior black 2TB 16mb eSATA 2/500gb 16mb ATA133/ OCZSSD2-1ONX32G + samsung 320gb 8mb ESATA
Case cm 690/GZ-x2/antec qaudro 1200w
Power Supply antec quattro 1200w/zumax 500w v2/antec HCG 900w
Software windows server 2008 sp2/windows xp x64 pro sp2c/windows server 2008 sp1
They doubled the rops/bus width because the 5770 was already very limited. Regardless of how much more shader/texture performance the new card has 10%, 20%, 50%... a higher rop power was necessary if a tangible improvements was to be seen. AMD is commited to only use widths that are multiples of 2, instead of using intrmediate numbers like Nvidia does so that's why the 256 bit figure comes in, even though it will probably be overkill on these cards. Don't expect Cayman to have more than 256 bits. It wouldn't be the first time in history when a midrange and high-end chips share the bus width...

really? just few days ago some of you said barts's rops wouldn't be over 16 and stick with 128bit bus...now things change...if cayman is about twice of barts spec than that will make 64 rops....i dont think a 256bit bus can feed these rops..again things will goes different than you think...plus faster ram eats more power and runs hotter and more costly than slower ram sodont get any hope on 7gt gddr5 ram as well. because it will end up having dual 8 pin pcie on a card that's merely 32 rops/256bit bus.....

it would be historical event if both high end and main stream share the same size bus...dont tell me about g92....it's never meant to be high end if werent gt 200 delayed...

anyway just wait and see cayman's spec
 

halfwaythere

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
70 (0.01/day)
Folks Barts is going to be the next 68xx cards. Cayman is going to be 6950 and 6970 while Antilles, the dual gpu card, will be 6990. Half this thread is filled with miss-information and people talking non-sense.

Anyways new stuff:

HD 6850 HD 5770 HD 5830 HD 5850
Codename Bart Pro XT Juniper Cypress Cypress Pro LE
Technology 40 nm 40 nm 40 nm 40 nm
Stream Proc. 1120 pcs. 800 pcs. 1120 pcs. 1440 pcs.
GPU frequency 72x MHz 850 MHz 800 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Frequency 4000 MHz 4800 MHz 4000 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory Bus 256-Bit 128-bit 256-bit 256-bit
Memory Technology GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5
TDP - 108 W 175 W 151 W
Launch 18-Oct Out now Out now Out now

Sweclockers've come across some new details about one of the graphics cards to be launched on October 18, more specifically Radeon 6850th This model is very similar to the specifications of today's Radeon 5830th Among others are 1120 stream processors and 1 GB of GDDR5 memory at 4000 MHz in 256-bit memory bus.

It does not mean that the performance is identical to the Radeon 5830th AMD has probably changed some of the graphics processor functionality for lower power consumption and introduce new features that probably also affects the computational power.

Radeon HD 6850 is flanked by large sibling HD 6870, also known as Bart's XT. Of course, this graphics card specifications have been exaggerated, but some more detailed features are not yet known. Media embargo expires on 18 October.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...m/nyhet/12713-fler-detaljer-om-radeon-hd-6850
 

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.31/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W
I think many people (including myself) are still hoping that amd are not stupid enough to mess up the naming so bad. There is no reason to change what has worked well for years.

Anything to do with spec of the top end chip is random geussing or dreaming in my case, untill amd releases the offecial spec nothing can be said for sure but i would rather dream up random spec's than sit around waiting for the real info and i think the same applys to most others here :p
 

halfwaythere

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
70 (0.01/day)
Seems pretty logical to me: they want to keep the x7xx naming scheme for the 128 bit parts. And since Turks is going to be a tessellation tweaked Juniper while Barts is a much more advanced Cypress derivate.

For the potential buyers this means Barts with Cypress like performance around the 200$ mark while Turks, an improved Juniper, below the 150$. Whats there to complain about?
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,665 (0.45/day)
Location
Switzerland
Processor i9 9900KS ( 5 Ghz all the time )
Motherboard Asus Maximus XI Hero Z390
Cooling EK Velocity + EK D5 pump + Alphacool full copper silver 360mm radiator
Memory 16GB Corsair Dominator GT ROG Edition 3333 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS TUF RTX 3080 Ti 12GB OC
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 970 Evo Plus 250 GB + 1TB 970 Evo Plus
Display(s) Asus PG279 IPS 1440p 165Hz G-sync
Case Cooler Master H500
Power Supply Asus ROG Thor 850W
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Rapoo
Software Win 10 64 Bit
nice new gpu every 6 months politics
 

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.31/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W
Seems pretty logical to me: they want to keep the x7xx naming scheme for the 128 bit parts. And since Turks is going to be a tessellation tweaked Juniper while Barts is a much more advanced Cypress derivate.

For the potential buyers this means Barts with Cypress like performance around the 200$ mark while Turks, an improved Juniper, below the 150$. Whats there to complain about?

umm it could be that i have no idea what is going on with the naming but i thought people had been throwing around the idea that barts would be x8xx names as in 6870 and 6850 and the next level up (Cayman?) would be 6970 and 6950 with the top dual chip being a 6990 thus why it made no sense to me why they whould change the naming to something like that... i think i'm just confused by all the rumors and false information floating around as usual before hardware launches.

*edit* i think posting first thing in the morning is not a great idea for me :p the problem is not knowing what the caymen chips will be spec'd is what is confusing me really as normally they have been double the mid range cards in recent years but if they are not this time around i geuss i can accept the new naming makes some sense but if a 5870 beats a 6870 then i would be going back to not understanding the change. i dont neven know where everyone is getting these names from, is there a source?
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
2,792 (0.40/day)
Location
Tre, Suomi Finland
System Name Ladpot ◦◦◦ Desktop
Processor R7 5800H ◦◦◦ i7 4770K, watercooled
Motherboard HP 88D2 ◦◦◦ Asus Z87-C2 Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Mixed gases ◦◦◦ Fuzion V1, MCW60/R2, DDC1/DDCT-01s top, PA120.3, EK200, D12SL-12, liq.metal TIM
Memory 2× 8GB DDR4-3200 ◦◦◦ 2× 8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 ◦◦◦ heaps of dead GPUs in the garage
Storage Samsung 980 PRO 2TB ◦◦◦ Samsung 840Pro 256@178GB + 4× WD Red 2TB in RAID10 + LaCie Blade Runner 4TB
Display(s) HP ZR30w 30" 2560×1600 (WQXGA) H2-IPS
Case Lian Li PC-A16B
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S / Contour RollerMouse Red+
Keyboard Logitech Elite Keyboard from 2006 / Contour Balance Keyboard / Logitech diNovo Edge
Software W11 x64 ◦◦◦ W10 x64
Benchmark Scores It does boot up? I think.
I smell a burger full o' crap here.
 

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.31/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W
I smell a burger full o' crap here.

:laugh: I just wish all the 6xxx cards were out sooner so we had the official spec already.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
483 (0.10/day)
Location
baghdad/iraq
Processor intel i5 2500k,atom280@1930mhz
Motherboard msi h61
Cooling i have cooler master V8 but now im on stock :P
Memory team group elite 2x2 1600 @1333 7 7 7 20
Video Card(s) sapphere 5850 toxic@900/1250
Storage WD 1TB green 5400 32mb ,WD 250gb 7200/8mb
Display(s) HP 22" 1680x1050 hdmi
Case asus vento
Audio Device(s) creative XFi fatality+creative gigaworksG500 5.1
Power Supply cooler master gx 750
Software win7,64bit
oh mama my 8800gt needs to step down it served me well for 2.5 years
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
1,583 (0.22/day)
Location
Poland,Slask
System Name HAL
Processor Core i5 2500K
Motherboard Asus P8P67 Pro Rev3.1
Cooling stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston 1600Mhz Blu
Video Card(s) Asus 560Ti DirectCuII TOP
Storage Kingston 120 3K SSD,WD Black WD1502FAEX
Display(s) LG 1440x900
Case Chieftec Mesh Midi
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750V2
Software w8
Don't you think its lame to write "its faster than Nvidia" on such slides?
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.68/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
So what will be the 5850 equivalent? I'm confused by this new naming scheam. 6850? 6950?
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
9,899 (1.78/day)
Location
Essex, England
System Name My pc
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Rog b450-f
Cooling Cooler master 120mm aio
Memory 16gb ddr4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 3x 3070
Storage 2tb intel nvme and 2tb generic ssd
Display(s) Generic dell 1080p overclocked to 75hz
Case Phanteks enthoo
Power Supply 650w of borderline fire hazard
Mouse Some wierd Chinese vertical mouse
Keyboard Generic mechanical keyboard
Software Windows ten
If they do change the naming scheme I'm going to rep the old woman attitude of complaining via a letter ha ha!

That will show them.

Any whom, I for one am not expecting 5850 performance from this card... mostly because I'd hate to see ATI repping a + 500 USD gpu as their top single gpu card ....

But what the hell, I have a job now. Next year assuming these arnt crap, and bulldozer isn't crap I'm going to get an all AMD rig, buy everything new for once as well : ]

aside from heatsinks.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
5,965 (0.99/day)
Location
New York
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, Ryzen 9 5980HX
Motherboard MSI X570 Tomahawk
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4(With Noctua Fans)
Memory 32Gb Crucial 3600 Ballistix
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080, Asus 6800M
Storage Adata SX8200 1TB NVME/WD Black 1TB NVME
Display(s) Dell 27 Inch 165Hz
Case Phanteks P500A
Audio Device(s) IFI Zen Dac/JDS Labs Atom+/SMSL Amp+Rivers Audio
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G502 SE Hero
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Mk.2
VR HMD Samsung Odyssey Plus
Software Windows 10
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
5,147 (0.78/day)
Location
AZ
System Name Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor i7 11700k 8/16
Motherboard MSI Z590 Pro Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4, 9x aigo AR12
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ Neo DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 2x Geforce RTX 3070
Storage 1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, + cloud mostly
Display(s) Samsung 40" 4k (TV)
Case Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic EVO Black
Audio Device(s) onboard HD -> Yamaha 5.1
Power Supply EVGA 850 GQ
Mouse Logitech wireless
Keyboard same
VR HMD nah
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores no one cares anymore lols
20% bump in shaders ok, doubling the rop's ? that seems unlikely, would be awesome, but unlikely. It's far easier to add shaders than it is to add rop's *unless* we're looking at a cripled cypress core here with a new name.
 

Paintface

New Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
389 (0.07/day)
Processor E5200 @ 3.7ghz
Motherboard DFI LanParty DK P35 DARK
Cooling Zalman CPU + case cooling
Memory OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 4GB 1066
Video Card(s) Saphire 4890 Vapor-X OCed
Storage Raptor 74GB + 640GB sata + 1TB sata ( all WD)
Display(s) BENQ 24inch LCD 1080p
Case my desk
Audio Device(s) Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply OCZ gameXstream 700w
Software Windows 7 x64 ultimate
All i worry about is the price.

a 5770 goes for 140
a 5850 goes for 260

if it scratches the 5850 performance i hope it goes for around 200 dollar

If it is merely a bit faster than the 5770 i hope it isnt a cent more expensive than $140

I say this cause i currently have a 4890 vapor x that i bought for $180 a year ago, barts will be 2 generations newer, if i cant buy a card being performance wise close to the 5850 or equal for 200 then i am out of options again to upgrade since the 5850 follow up whatever the name will be a 300+ card more than likely.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
5,147 (0.78/day)
Location
AZ
System Name Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor i7 11700k 8/16
Motherboard MSI Z590 Pro Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4, 9x aigo AR12
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ Neo DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 2x Geforce RTX 3070
Storage 1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, + cloud mostly
Display(s) Samsung 40" 4k (TV)
Case Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic EVO Black
Audio Device(s) onboard HD -> Yamaha 5.1
Power Supply EVGA 850 GQ
Mouse Logitech wireless
Keyboard same
VR HMD nah
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores no one cares anymore lols
All i worry about is the price.

a 5770 goes for 140
a 5850 goes for 260

if it scratches the 5850 performance i hope it goes for around 200 dollar

If it is merely a bit faster than the 5770 i hope it isnt a cent more expensive than $140

I say this cause i currently have a 4890 vapor x that i bought for $180 a year ago, barts will be 2 generations newer, if i cant buy a card being performance wise close to the 5850 or equal for 200 then i am out of options again to upgrade since the 5850 follow up whatever the name will be a 300+ card more than likely.

look for performance between the 5830 and the 5850. ie exactly where targeted.
 
Top