The only way I can imagine that being possible is if the virus had (prior to removal) opened a port in the firewall(s)/router(s) which was not detected and repaired during the removal process. That port would have to be connected to a service (running on the machine in question) that the virus either created/modified or was capable of exploiting.
There are probably other ways of a virus reinfecting over the internet without user interaction, but if your firewall(s)/router(s) and security settings are intact the risk should be minimal.
So, if 2 PC's on a network were infected and you disconnected PC "A" from the network, re-installed OS and enabled firewall but didn't install antivirus, could PC "B" reinfect it?
I'm wondering if a clever virus could re-infect you in this way:
1. You get infected (PC A), so does someone in Australia (PC B) (with the same virus, from the same source)
2. The virus infects both properly and stores PC A and PC B's i.p.'s on each PC.
3. PC A gets OS reinstalled while disconnected from the net.
4. PC A gets reconnected to the net after OS reinstall, and (with firewall enabled by default) you start downloading antivirus program.
Q: Can PC A get re-infected by PC B between connecting to the net after OS re-install, and finishing downloading the antivirus (between step 3 and step 4)?
For argument's sake, say the variables are at "worst case scenario": the virus would have to be enabled to:
"save and call/ping/check other infected i.p.'s peridoically"
"take advantage of an exploit from an OS with no updates" (for example, after installing XP with no service packs, where no Microsoft Updates have been installed that deal with the simplest, oldest of exploits)
I know it's a bit of a small gap of time, but if a virus is made to check on other infected PC's, then could it be done with no user action (again, I stress with default firewall settings and no SP's/updates that may protect against this)?
um ... all the companies in the world?
Yes companies use e-mail over LAN, but as I said above, how many of them are
disconnected from the net at the same time (just LAN, no internet)? If the answer is negligible then it's covered under "The web"
Today incompetence appears anywhere. If someone works for a company with some buzz name it doesn't mean they're invincible.
True to an extent; in the corporate sector, all updates (which are the virus-makers first point of attack) must go through rigorous checks before being installed network-wide, so it would almost
have to be incompetence that causes an infection in the workplace. But kinda like Mussels is saying; you're much less likely to find corporate computers infecting eachother than end-users infecting eachother, as they have measurements in place to avoid being exploited in the first place.
It doesn't even take incompetence for an end-user to get infected:
Adobe Flash receives an update.
Download and install.
New virus takes advantage of a new component within the latest Adobe update.
Adobe pop-up comes up and says "do you want to update Adobe?".
You click "No" as you know you've already updated it; you are being cautious.
Virus infects you anyway as it preys on a gammy Adobe exploit.
Most people think if they have a decent AV they will be safe forever, but a new virus can infect you, even if you have *insert your favourite av here* with all the latest updates. Not because of incompetence or user error, but all due to the coding talent of the author.
APK
j/k