- Joined
- Dec 26, 2009
- Messages
- 560 (0.11/day)
- Location
- boondocks, Michigan
System Name | Majestic Command 3.0 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 3600 |
Motherboard | ASRock B450M Pro 4 |
Cooling | Corsair water loop |
Memory | 2x8GB Ballistix DDR4 |
Video Card(s) | RX 5600 XT |
Storage | 1TB WD Black SN750 M.2, a home server |
Display(s) | Asus VG249Q |
Case | Darkflash DLM22 - black |
Audio Device(s) | X-Fi HD>AT-HA25D>FR-N71X |
Power Supply | EVGA 600W standard |
Mouse | Razer Mamba Elite |
Keyboard | Razer Blackwidow Chroma TE |
Software | Windows 10 |
It seems that standard ATX cases and motherboards are popular with system builders. While I could understand how a person wanting a tri-SLI or Crossfire setup would go with this, a lot of people I know have built their computers with standard ATX parts without the intention of radically upgrading their hardware in the future. Although I think the selection of ATX parts is generally better than what's offered for smaller form factors, I couldn't bring myself to build a large system (at least since the days of 386/486/Pentium where lots of cards were necessary). ATX systems are heavy, take a lot of space, and have a bunch more expansion slots than I'll ever need. It also gets a lot tougher when the possibility of LAN parties come into play as well.
I'm curious to know how the members of TPU feel about this. If you have a larger system, how many slots are actually filled up? Now that most of the latest tech is available on uATX and even ITX systems, what makes the standard ATX or larger system the better (or at least preferred) way to go?
I'm curious to know how the members of TPU feel about this. If you have a larger system, how many slots are actually filled up? Now that most of the latest tech is available on uATX and even ITX systems, what makes the standard ATX or larger system the better (or at least preferred) way to go?