• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Marketing and Prejudice Get the Better of Consumers with PC Processors: Test

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,276 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
At the AMD & HardOCP Game Experience event held in Texas, gamers were asked to participate in a blind test. The test involved gaming on two sets of gaming PCs with two PCs each, in each set is an AMD-powered PC, and an Intel-powered one. Participants weren't disclosed which PC was driven by what, as they were assembled in identical-looking cases (no window), with identical monitors and other peripherals. The first set is of budget single-monitor HD gaming, while the second set is high-end three-monitor gaming.

After gaming on both rigs in each set, respondents were asked to tick on a sheet of paper, which rig gave them a better gaming experience, or if gaming both had no observable difference. AMD went into this exercise expecting that most respondents will select "no difference" as their option, and so that would bring good PR to AMD, but to their surprise, most respondents selected the rigs that was powered by AMD processors.



In the budget single-monitor gaming machine, the AMD machine (system B) was powered by AMD A8-3850, ASRock A55 chipset motherboard; the Intel machine (system A) was powered by Intel Core i3-2105, and ASRock H61 chipset motherboard. The goal was to configure the PCs to cost under US $500. Both machines were made to use CPU-integrated graphics Ofcourse the respondants were not told which machine was driven by what. The results are as follows:
  • System A (Intel Core i3-2105) better: 5 votes
  • System B (AMD A8-3850) better: 136 votes
  • No difference: 2 votes
With the high-end gaming machines, the Intel machine (system A) was powered by Intel Core i7-2700K, with ASRock P67 Fatal1ty motherboard; the AMD machine (system B) was powered by AMD FX-8150 with ASRock 990FX Fatal1ty motherboard, both machines were given Radeon HD 7970 graphics driving 3-monitor Eyefinity. Again, the respondents didn't know which system was driven by what processor. Results are as follows:
  • System A (Intel Core i7-2700K) better: 40 votes
  • System B (AMD FX-8150) better: 73 votes
  • No difference: 28 votes
The results of this little experiment modeled along the lines of PepsiCo's famous blind-tests of the 1970s shows that marketing and prejudice get the better of consumers, at least in the case of PC processors.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Messages
100 (0.02/day)
Location
Amelia, VA
Processor AMD 965 BE
Motherboard MSI gd70
Cooling Koolance Exos 2.5 w/ cpu 350 block
Memory 8gb corsair Dominator ddr3 1600
Video Card(s) 2 sapphire 6870's liquid cooled
Storage 8 150 gb wd raptors in raid 0
Display(s) Acer 24in lcd
Case Thermaltake Armor lcs
Power Supply Thermaltake Tough Power 1200w
Software Win7 64 Ultimate
nothing new here

it's all about marketing and displays which of the 2 companies excel at it.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
1,877 (0.32/day)
Location
Cobourg,Ontario
System Name RyZen FX
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling DeepCool AK400 Zero Dark Plus
Memory Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 X2 32gig dual channel
Video Card(s) ASUS RX 7700XT TUF OC
Storage x2 Lexar SSD NM710 2TB 2XSeagate 1Terrabyte 1x Seagate 2 Terrabyte
Display(s) 40 Inch Samsung HDTV (monitor)
Case HAF-X:)
Audio Device(s) AMD/HDMI to Onkyo HT-R508 Receiver
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2 Power Supply
Software Windows 10 Pro X64
They should try this at E3 or some trade shows ,I bet the out come will be the same.Also 3 monitors is better then one cpu clock for clock.:toast::laugh:
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
499 (0.07/day)
I can't quantify it but my Llano setup impresses me and many others who have seen it in action.

Otherwise, I would simply chalk up the first test to better image quality.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
4,213 (0.75/day)
Location
Vietnam
System Name Gaming System / HTPC-Server
Processor i7 8700K (@4.8 Ghz All-Core) / R7 5900X
Motherboard Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / MSI B450 Mortar Max
Cooling CM ML360 / CM ML240L
Memory 16Gb Hynix @3200 MHz / 16Gb Hynix @3000Mhz
Video Card(s) Zotac 3080 / Colorful 1060
Storage 750G MX300 + 2x500G NVMe / 40Tb Reds + 1Tb WD Blue NVMe
Display(s) LG 27GN800-B 27'' 2K 144Hz / Sony TV
Case Xigmatek Aquarius Plus / Corsair Air 240
Audio Device(s) On Board Realtek
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III Gold 750W / Andyson TX-700 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero / K400+
Keyboard Wooting Two / K400+
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R15 = 1542 3D Mark Timespy = 9758
For the hi-end machine the sample size is far to small to show anything conclusively.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
499 (0.07/day)
I thought the sample sizes were reasonable.

I'd be really interested to know WHY they thought the high-end AMD system was better
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,276 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Some might argue that since the respondents might have known that at least one of the two rigs had Intel, it might have had a "placebo effect" on them, influencing their choice; but then the results are clearly in favor of the AMD rig in both tests, so that could not have been a factor.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,356 (0.50/day)
Location
VT
Processor Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling Corsair H100i RGB
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming Trio X 3070 LHR
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
For the hi-end machine the sample size is far to small to show anything conclusively.

Definitely. I think (from the picture at least) on the 3-Screen setup the System B is a little more spacious as well. Could just be the angle, but it looks like the guy playing at System A is a little more cramped in. Things like this do affect people perception.

I think the Low-End system is a given though. The AMD Machine was overwhelmingly picked because the Fusion Platform has way better integrated GPU's. Nobody is really surprised by that fact. The only way they could prove marketting prejudice is if they did 2 groups of equal size, and told 1 which setup was which, but not the other. If the one that was told skews in the opposite direction as the one that wasn't, they are clearly having clouded judgement.
 
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
183 (0.03/day)
Location
Bucharest
Blind test with PCs is not possible, they can find out with a simple Dxdiag command which CPU is in which system. So the test is not relevant, unless they do it double blind and in a controlled environment so that they really do not know and do not have a way to find out which system is AMD powered.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2007
Messages
1,368 (0.23/day)
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE Deneb @ 3.7GHz
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-MA790XT-UD4P
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9700 CPU Heatsink
Memory OCZ 4GB DDR3 1600 @ 7-7-7-24 1.85v
Video Card(s) ATI Sapphire OC 7850 1200c/5800m @ 64c Full Load
Storage Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB + Western Digital 1TB External Drive
Display(s) SAMSUNG ToC T240 24'' LCD
Case Silverstone FT01-BW
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply ZALMAN ZM-750
Software Win 7 x64 SP1
no surprise AMD is the better choice. shame for those people who spend so much money on rigs just to benchmark.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.61/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Definitely. I think (from the picture at least) on the 3-Screen setup the System B is a little more spacious as well. Could just be the angle, but it looks like the guy playing at System A is a little more cramped in. Things like this do affect people perception.
Pure marketing stunt. Apart from the subtle setup differences, there's no way you can eliminate observer and control bias in this scenario. For the results to mean anything, you'd need both everything verified identical (including software in the backround), ABX testing ( 1 x Intel, 1 x AMD and 1 x random Intel or AMD rig) and supervision from someone who did not know the setups (double blind testing).
Call me cynical but I've learned lately that AMD's viral marketing needs to be taken with the contents of the Bonneville Salt Flats (Did anyone check to see if John Fruehe was in attendance?)
I think the Low-End system is a given though.
I'm surprised that the Intel system garnered 5 votes...which kind of throws the other results into a dubious light
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,356 (0.50/day)
Location
VT
Processor Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling Corsair H100i RGB
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming Trio X 3070 LHR
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
no surprise AMD is the better choice. shame for those people who spend so much money on rigs just to benchmark.

My i5-2500k is cheaper and outperforms an FX-8150 in about 90% of gaming benchmarks. I don't feel cheated in the slightest.
 

thereturnfc

New Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
Blind test with PCs is not possible, they can find out with a simple Dxdiag command which CPU is in which system. So the test is not relevant, unless they do it double blind and in a controlled environment so that they really do not know and do not have a way to find out which system is AMD powered.



No surprise , these word means that you never done any experiment/LAB. otherwise...what is the purpose of this test to begin with?!?!
 

v12dock

Block Caption of Rainey Street
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
1,959 (0.35/day)
System A (Intel Core i3-2105) better: 5 votes
System B (AMD A8-3850) better: 136 votes

No kidding the A8 would give a better gaming experience
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
2,202 (0.46/day)
System Name Ultima
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard MSI Mag B550M Mortar
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 240 rev4 w/ Ryzen offset mount
Memory G.SKill Ripjaws V 2x16GB DDR4 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 4070 12GB Dual
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB Gen4, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB , 1TB Crucial MX500 SSD sata,
Display(s) ASUS TUF VG249Q3A 24" 1080p 165-180Hz VRR
Case DarkFlash DLM21 Mesh
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200 Audio/Nvidia HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Steelseries Rival 3 Wireless | Wacom Intuos CTH-480
Keyboard A4Tech B314 Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
wtf 5 votes on i3 2105 lol i was expecting zero/nada.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
22 (0.00/day)
I'd probably buy this if test was made by 3rd party, but @ the event hosted by AMD - meeh. And what drivers they used for both machines? personally im not sure if both pc's were identical other than cpu/mobo. Looks shady to me. What i know for sure from other independently made reviews is that FX8150 bottlenecks 7970 performing worse than nehalem quads.

no surprise AMD is the better choice. shame for those people who spend so much money on rigs just to benchmark.

lol yeah but dont forget that those "stupid" benchmarks actually measure performance.
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,970 (0.36/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name penguin
Processor R7 5700G
Motherboard Asrock B450M Pro4
Cooling Some CM tower cooler that will fit my case
Memory 4 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Fury 2666MHz
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) 27' LG
Case Zalman
Audio Device(s) stock
Power Supply Seasonic SS-620GM
Software win10
Erm it was an AMD show... Let's think a bit, what are the majority of people that usually go to these kinds of shows? That's right - fans! So if AMD fans go to an amd show to see some AMD systems and also have the chance to play on said systems, they'd feel happy and compelled to root for the people that gave them that chance, no?
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,276 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Erm it was an AMD show... Let's think a bit, what are the majority of people that usually go to these kinds of shows? That's right - fans! So if AMD fans go to an amd show to see some AMD systems and also have the chance to play on said systems, they'd feel happy and compelled to root for the people that gave them that chance, no?

But then they didn't know which system was AMD, which was Intel. It was a blind-test.

lol yeah but dont forget that those "stupid" benchmarks actually measure performance.

Yeah, and this test shows that outperformance in benchmarks means squat as long as games are smooth enough.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,389 (0.98/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> ... nope still the same :'(
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Erm it was an AMD show... Let's think a bit, what are the majority of people that usually go to these kinds of shows? That's right - fans! So if AMD fans go to an amd show to see some AMD systems and also have the chance to play on said systems, they'd feel happy and compelled to root for the people that gave them that chance, no?

Are you serious?
And if you are, I am at a loss for words other then "please learn to read".
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
499 (0.07/day)
I'd probably buy this if test was made by 3rd party, but @ the event hosted by AMD - meeh. And what drivers they used for both machines? personally im not sure if both pc's were identical other than cpu/mobo. Looks shady to me. What i know for sure from other independently made reviews is that FX8150 bottlenecks 7970 performing worse than nehalem quads.

You're assuming vsync is off.

With it capped at 60fps is there really much of a perceived difference?
 

naoan

New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
303 (0.06/day)
System Name AMD?
Audio Device(s) onboard
Software 7 X64
Erm it was an AMD show... Let's think a bit, what are the majority of people that usually go to these kinds of shows? That's right - fans! So if AMD fans go to an amd show to see some AMD systems and also have the chance to play on said systems, they'd feel happy and compelled to root for the people that gave them that chance, no?

My thought exactly.

But then they didn't know which system was AMD, which was Intel. It was a blind-test.

Easy, pick the one with more obvious fps drops from time to time. :laugh:
 

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
12,378 (2.37/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
Like others have pointed out it's fairly obvious AMD would win a cpu gfx test. They have the best on chip gfx by far of the two companies.

As for the bigger test, using an AMD gfx card (7970) with either an Intel chip or an AMD chip isn't a very good test scientifically. It would need various combinations with AMD cpu + AMD gfx, AMD cpu + Nvidia gfx, Intel cpu + AMD gfx and Intel cpu with Nvidia gfx. That gives four options and an analysis of variance would provide more insight.

All that being said, i dont think there would be a perceivable difference bewteen cpu's using a 7970 (unless there is inherent programming bias from the same brand combo). The sample size is too small and also, if Intel did the same test and came up with the same results (but favouring themselves - on the expensive rig) we'd all be suspicious too.

They shoulda stuck a phenom II in there instead of the Intel but they'd have probably known what would've happened. (Point being, despite brand loyalty they are still trying to flog BD, therefore using a Phenom II might have upset that sales trip).
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,757 (0.31/day)
System Name Lailalo
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X Boosts to 4.95Ghz
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus (WIFI
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) XFX 7900XT 20GB
Storage Samsung 970 Pro Plus 1TB, Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper
Power Supply XPG 1000W
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
wtf 5 votes on i3 2105 lol i was expecting zero/nada.

Meanwhile in Intel's impenetrable fortress of Core doom...

"Did you five succeed?"

"Yes master. We successfully sabotaged AMD's event by casting our votes for the i3 system."

"Excellent! Those five votes will be the start of our revolution!! If people will stop and think about why those five chose the i3...they can be made to think anything!!!"

"But, we lost on both tests!"

"Yes well...out my sight! I don't pay you to think! Go back to IGP R&D!"

"Oh boy! Hey guys, lets celebrate with an wafer fight!!"
"Yay! Silicon on silicon action!!!"
"Dibs on HD3000 wafers!!"
"Awww, no fair those fly better!"
"Oh I am so pulling out my GMA950 ninja star wafers!!"

And then...

"Useless engineers. They'll never see the grand picture! I will show them with my evil laugh!"
"Muhhahahahahahaha hahahah ahahahahah haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhahaaaaaa!!"
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.61/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Win-Win for AMD in any case. If the majority of people pick i7 over Bulldozer then it's not really earth shattering news, and that isn't the case then I'm sure the guy that does their PR/waters the office plants gets some good copy.

How much (if any) difference is largely going to come down to the game being played. AMD and their fans are very quick to point out BF3 and F1 2011 as being "representative" of the overall abilities of each CPU (games that along with AvP don't really care what CPU is in the system...anyone care to guess what the people were playing?)....I'm pretty certain Civ 5 wasn't on the menu.

AMD should have been ballsy...pit Bulldozer against i3 2300 or an 1100T and see if anyone noticed the difference.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Messages
1,132 (0.19/day)
System Name Grandpa
Processor i5 4690K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X-UD5H-BK
Cooling water
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence 2400MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 5850 x2
Storage Samsung SM951
Display(s) Catleap 27"
Case coolermaster stacker
Power Supply corsair AX860i
Mouse logitech g5 original
Keyboard Ducky
Software Windows 8.1
This test would be very interesting/compelling if it was done by someone independant. As the info was provided by their marketing dept., I don't believe.
 
Top