Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
- Messages
- 18,927 (2.86/day)
- Location
- Piteå
System Name | Black MC in Tokyo |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 5600 |
Motherboard | Asrock B450M-HDV |
Cooling | Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2 |
Memory | 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz |
Video Card(s) | XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319 |
Storage | Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB |
Display(s) | Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p |
Case | Fractal Design Define R4 |
Audio Device(s) | Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850x v3 |
Mouse | Logitech G602 |
Keyboard | Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown |
VR HMD | Acer Mixed Reality Headset |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | Rimworld 4K ready! |
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/02/hp-itanium/
HP is about the only ones left supporting Itanium, and 700 million is almost a fourth of the whole Itanium sales from Intel.
http://peopleprocesstech.com/2012/06/05/why-the-hp-superdome-is-as-dead-as-a-dodo/
Westmere does most of the same things. Bulldozer supports ECC memory, and its own caches are ECC protected.
It seems like those articles say different things than Katanai does. That "it turned out that Intel’s boring old X86 chips — now sold as Xeon — were good enough to get the job done." So who should I listen to?