• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Seagate Delivers Industry's First Purpose-Built 4TB Video HDD

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,344 (7.68/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Seagate Technology today announced the new Seagate Video 3.5 HDD- the industry's first 4TB, 3.5-inch hard disk drive (HDD) engineered specifically for use in video applications such as digital video recorders (DVRs), set-top boxes (STBs), and surveillance systems. Purpose-built for video solutions, the Video 3.5 HDD can store up to 480 hours of high-definition (HD) content making it the industry's highest-capacity drive designed specifically for video.

Engineered to deliver superior performance and operation in three key areas of importance to manufacturers- high capacity and streaming capability, reliability and acoustics- the Video 3.5 HDD is ideal for satellite and cable providers and surveillance system builders. Featuring capacities up to 4TB, the drive supports up to 16 simultaneous HD streams or 20 standard-definition streams as well as 24x7 operation capabilities making it ideal for video content applications.



"Leveraging Seagate's 10 years of experience understanding the requirements of the video market, we've combined our knowledge on heat, acoustics and power to deliver what we believe to be the most reliable DVR drive in the world," said Scott Horn, Seagate vice president of marketing. "Our commitment to deliver a drive with unrivaled reliability ensures the safekeeping of consumers' content as well as keeping DVRs, STBs, and surveillance systems in the field longer."

Featuring industry-leading reliability, the Video 3.5 HDD has a 0.55 percent annual failure rate enabling product to be kept in the field longer while reducing the cost of field deployment and maintaining customer retention- making it ideal for manufacturers who need reliable product with long lifespans. The drive is engineered for low power consumption and heat emissions allowing solution providers greater design flexibility.

"We congratulate Seagate on its newest innovation," said Mark Jackson, president of EchoStar Technologies, one of the top DVR manufacturers for the satellite market in North America. "Seagate is a leader in the dedicated video HDD space, delivering top-of-the-line products that help us bring customers the most advanced and reliable DVRs in the industry."

The living-room environment requires superior acoustic management to limit audible distractions during operation of DVRs and STBs and the Video 3.5 HDD enables designers to build the quietest home entertainment systems possible. Boasting near silent acoustics, the drive operates below the range of audible sound for the human ear at just 2.3 decibels providing optimized acoustics for home entertainment components - crucial for consumer electronics and video applications.

For more information on the Seagate Video 3.5 HDD please visit this page.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
223 (0.04/day)
Warranty?

Can't see what warranty they are giving with this?

Do they actually use different components when making the different drives and giving them the different lengths of warranty or is the difference in pricing purely the customer paying for that warranty?

It is a little worrying that all drive manufactures have opted to reduce their regular drive warranties down to just 1 year. Before the floods in Thailand the average warranty was 3 years and if i remember correctly Seagate was going to make 5 year warranty standard across all drives.

Why are they only offer 1 year warranty now? Are they using much less durable components?
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
217 (0.04/day)
Processor Xeon E5 1650 V4
Motherboard MSI X99A SLI PLUS
Cooling HYPER 212 EVO
Memory 64gb DDR4 2133
Video Card(s) XFX RADEON RX 480 8GB
Storage Samsung PM951 512GB NVMe SSD
Display(s) LG 34" Ultrawide + AOC 27"
Power Supply EVGA 750 Watt
Mouse Logitech M280
Keyboard Dell SK-8135
really seagate...take a 4tb drive, change nothing and call it purpose built for video, as if anyone uses 4tb drives for a reason other than a video library, nooo theyre storing 4tb of music...well maybe except for audiophiles and their "lossless" and whats up with this 16 and 20 streams, its a 6g connection, the average sata drive will easily give you 150mB/s over that connection, thats only enough for 20 sd streams? the average sd stream is less than 1MB/s, i call bollocks
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
187 (0.04/day)
Location
Illinois
Processor Intel i5-6700K @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS Z170-A
Cooling Scythe FUMA
Memory 16 GB (2 x 8GB) Mushkin Redline DDR4 2666 15-15-15-35
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 Ti SeaHawk X
Storage A lot
Display(s) Alienware AW3418DW
Case CM 690 III
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Ducky Shine 3 Magenta MX Cherry Brown
Sounds like marketing BS to me.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
4,015 (0.80/day)
Location
UK
System Name PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 3600
Motherboard MSI B450 Mortar Max
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC12DX, 3 x NZXT FN 140mm, 1x NZXT FV V2 120mm
Memory 32gb DDR4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS R9 290 DCII-OC 4GB
Storage corsair mp600 1TB
Display(s) LG 27MB85Z 27" 1440p
Case NZXT Source 340
Power Supply Thermaltake 675w
Mouse Logitech G500S
Keyboard Logitech G510S
Software Windows 8.1 64 bit
really seagate...take a 4tb drive, change nothing and call it purpose built for video, as if anyone uses 4tb drives for a reason other than a video library, nooo theyre storing 4tb of music...well maybe except for audiophiles and their "lossless" and whats up with this 16 and 20 streams, its a 6g connection, the average sata drive will easily give you 150mB/s over that connection, thats only enough for 20 sd streams? the average sd stream is less than 1MB/s, i call bollocks

Hard drives tend to exhibit a slower speed when multiple smaller files are written as opposed to singular large ones, i presume it's the drives write speed itself in this situation thats the limit here.
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
445 (0.11/day)
Location
Lithuania
Hard drives tend to exhibit a slower speed when multiple smaller files are written as opposed to singular large ones, i presume it's the drives write speed itself in this situation thats the limit here.
Hard drives are slower when small files are transfered because writing head has to jump all over the place.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.93/day)
It depends how small files are positioned. If they are in rather sequential order it can be just as fast.

Though i for some reason prefer WD's duas stage R/W head which tends to be much quicker at random accesses...
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.64/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
"Video" is a better name than "SV." Every time I saw "SV" at Newegg, I had to research WTF it meant.

I suspect the difference between these and normal Barracuda drives is in the firmware likely in how it caches data.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
895 (0.22/day)
Now if you believe that this HDD is actually designed for video use, I have some prime ocean front property in AZ that you might be interested in... ;)
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.95/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
if you believe that this HDD is actually designed optimized for video use

I fixed your sentence to make it true. The drive might not be designed specifically for video but as Ford said, it could be optimized with special firmware.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
4,015 (0.80/day)
Location
UK
System Name PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 3600
Motherboard MSI B450 Mortar Max
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC12DX, 3 x NZXT FN 140mm, 1x NZXT FV V2 120mm
Memory 32gb DDR4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS R9 290 DCII-OC 4GB
Storage corsair mp600 1TB
Display(s) LG 27MB85Z 27" 1440p
Case NZXT Source 340
Power Supply Thermaltake 675w
Mouse Logitech G500S
Keyboard Logitech G510S
Software Windows 8.1 64 bit
It depends how small files are positioned. If they are in rather sequential order it can be just as fast.

Though i for some reason prefer WD's duas stage R/W head which tends to be much quicker at random accesses...

This would be writing multiple continuous video continuously though, so if it's not writing them in different positions there's going to be really bad fragmentation.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.24/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I bought some of the 3TB models for the RAID array in my server, they works wonderfully. You can use them for standard desktop use too, they are just optimized for video storage and running 24/7.

Can't see what warranty they are giving with this?

Do they actually use different components when making the different drives and giving them the different lengths of warranty or is the difference in pricing purely the customer paying for that warranty?

It is a little worrying that all drive manufactures have opted to reduce their regular drive warranties down to just 1 year. Before the floods in Thailand the average warranty was 3 years and if i remember correctly Seagate was going to make 5 year warranty standard across all drives.

Why are they only offer 1 year warranty now? Are they using much less durable components?

Seagate gives a 3 year warranty on this line of drives. At least that is what my 3TB versions came with, I can't see them lowering it for the 4TB version.
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
223 (0.04/day)
I bought some of the 3TB models for the RAID array in my server, they works wonderfully. You can use them for standard desktop use too, they are just optimized for video storage and running 24/7.



Seagate gives a 3 year warranty on this line of drives. At least that is what my 3TB versions came with, I can't see them lowering it for the 4TB version.

The point i was making is what is the difference between the '24/7' drivers and the cheaper standard drives apart from the price and warranty which to me seems like you are just paying for the warranty.

PS

All hard drivers work wonderfully until they suddenly fail and you feel like you have just been mugged so i hope its RAID-1 you have.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.24/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
The point i was making is what is the difference between the '24/7' drivers and the cheaper standard drives apart from the price and warranty which to me seems like you are just paying for the warranty.

PS

All hard drivers work wonderfully until they suddenly fail and you feel like you have just been mugged so i hope its RAID-1 you have.

Yes, there is a difference. Besides the firmware optimizations, the quality of the components is better. The circuitry uses better components, better PCB, better ICs, etc.

And they are in RAID-5. I'd never run RAID-0 with anything important.
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Messages
33 (0.01/day)
WD's piezoelectric wrist is awesome

It depends how small files are positioned. If they are in rather sequential order it can be just as fast.

Though i for some reason prefer WD's duas stage R/W head which tends to be much quicker at random accesses...

Yup WD's 2TB Caviar Black with dual stage piezoelectric wrist is still the quickest consumer 7200RPM drive with an average access time of around 11.8ms.

I think they don't use that piezoelectric technology in the 4TB model for some reason :(. I was looking forward to seeing it in a Scorpio Black 7200RPM laptop drive too.

5900RPM, that's fine for specific sequential and multi-sequential tasks but not for heavy duty work. I'm sure a regular Seagate green drive would work fine in a set top box.
A real hard drive is 7200RPM and if you want a supercharger, get a hybrid 7200RPM model with write caching. I hope they proliferate the desktop market so we can have 4TB+ 7200RPM hybrid desktop drives and I hope that Seagate continues making 7200RPM hybrid laptop drives, even though right now they're just making 5400RPM hybrid laptop drives (can be slow if data isn't cached, I'll never buy one).
Let me guess, this is a 5x800GB platter drive?

The 1 thing I'll give them is that it is rated for up to 70 Celsius operating temperature. Typically drives are rated at 60C. Also operating shock at 80g is a bit higher than average I think.

Their specifications page has bad data though;http://www.seagate.com/internal-har.../video-3-5-hdd/?cmpid=friendly-_-video-hdd-us
Says only 3 watts idle power consumption even on the 4TB model, but the datasheet http://www.seagate.com/files/www-co.../en-us/docs/video-3.5-hdd-ds1783-1-1302us.pdf
says 5 watts, which is far more realistic.
Also on the datasheet, a drive ready time of 15 seconds? Really? At 24watts of 12V power consumption it won't take long to spin up.
Some of the lower capacities says <17, or 6, or 12 seconds. Sounds like firmware bloat/excessive self testing before coming online if accurate, though I doubt those numbers are accurate at all.

24/7 operation; I don't buy into the marketing. I have my Scorpio Black 750GB drive running nearly 24/7 in my laptop for years now with zero issues. Besides, there are no 24/7 rated laptop drives. So who cares about that label. Just keep a backup handy as with all drives.
 
Last edited:
Top