• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Custom NVIDIA GTX 760 Card Pictured And Tested

Sin

News Editor
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
244 (0.05/day)
Location
under the bed
With the official GeForce GTX 760 launch imminent, leaked specs, benchmark scores and pics are to be expected. That is precisely what we are looking at today, a card branded Xenon JetStream, sporting the familiar Palit aesthetics, apparently Xenon being a Palit sub-brand for the South Korean market. The images, specs and scores come from the ChipHell boards, where they were posted by forum member Charlie.

The card itself is very small, apparently a non-reference design, making use of an over-sized dual fan cooler, known to us from various GTX 600 generation cards, sold by Palit under the JetStream moniker. The GPU specs confirm the previous leaks, boasting 1152 CUDA cores, 96 TMUs and 32 ROPs. This particular card comes factory overclocked, with the base clock set at 1072 MHz and the boost clock 65 Mhz higher, at 1137 MHz. The GDDR5 memory, 2 GB on this model, comes with a slight overclock as well, 1550 Mhz precisely (6200 Mhz effective speed). Performance wise, the card did slightly better than a stock GTX 670, so keeping in mind the lower stock clocks of the reference GTX 760 card, we can expect it to perform slightly worse than a stock GTX 670.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 24505

Guest
Looks bigger on the first pic, looks tiny on the fifth.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Looks bigger on the first pic, looks tiny on the fifth.

I think the card is shopped on to the guys lap in the first pic. Some weird stuff going on with the PCI-E slot and... dat drop shadow!
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.13/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
I think the card is shopped on to the guys lap in the first pic. Some weird stuff going on with the PCI-E slot and... dat drop shadow!

Or it's a small card like the 670 with an overhanging heatsink that from the front makes it look like a 10/11" card
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
343 (0.08/day)
Location
Ft Stewart
System Name Queen Bee
Processor 3570k @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte UD3 Z77
Cooling Water Loop by EK
Memory 8GB Corsair 1600 DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 Gaming WaterCooled
Storage 1x Western Digital 500GB Black 1x Intel 20GB 311 SSD
Display(s) BenQ XL2420G
Case CoolTek W2
Power Supply Corsair 650Watt
Software Windows 7 Pro
Within margin of error performance of a 670 in Synthetic Testing!!!
That would make it an excellent deal at it's projected price :rockout:
 

Sagia86

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
13 (0.00/day)
What the point?

nVidia should try to released their product that 3 or 4 generation more than AMD in order to dominate the GPU market. Look at what Intel already did to AMD
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.13/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
What the point using the same architecture/generation of chip and get only 3% - 5% increase? The only way nVidia to dominate or survive in the GPU market is by leaving AMD 3 or 4 generation behind... Look at Intel did to AMD

AMD is not 4 gens behind Intel, if you think that you really should do some more research into both offerings as you're way off with your understanding. Not only that but Intel have 10x more resources in terms of R+D and available resources (money), the fact that AMD can still compete with them and have beaten them in the past is the biggest compliment you could give to AMD. Nvidia don't have the same kind of advantage over AMD and so would never be able to gain such an advantage. Factor in that AMD are selling chips to MS, Nintendo and Sony for the next 5+ years for the next gen consoles and if anything it's NV who need to be worrying about the future and falling behind.
 

Sagia86

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
13 (0.00/day)
Yeah2, i didn't said that intel leave the AMD by 4 generation behind, I said nVidia "should try to leave" the AMD generation in order to survive in this gpu market. Yeah2, i now AMD have so many die hard fan, i know they got PS4, Xbox and Nintendo as their main supplier, i know have won the case against Intel and got some money. Well, like you said, currently nvidia don't have that resources to do it, they should do that when they still compete with ATI and lazying around by rebadges Geforce 2 mx to became Geforce 4 mx and wasting money by giving 3dfx team to develop a Geforce 5.

For the Intel part, first the delay the K10 (Phenom 2008) which should be compete with Core 2, then after that got TLB bug with that one too... Then Bulldozer released (2011) which they should be compete with Nehalem but even Intel Core 2 processor or K10 can still beat bulldozer in not heavily thread software. Then comes Piledriver, which the bulldozer should be but still unable to beat Nehalem in benchmark (well, maybe some program faster)

So Intel Core, Nehalem, Sandy Bridge now Haswell
AMD K10, Bulldozer, Piledriver (which is still struggling to even beat Nehalem)
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.13/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
Yeah2, i didn't said that intel leave the AMD by 4 generation behind, I said nVidia "should try to leave" the AMD generation in order to survive in this gpu market. Yeah2, i now AMD have so many die hard fan, i know they got PS4, Xbox and Nintendo as their main supplier, i know have won the case against Intel and got some money. Well, like you said, currently nvidia don't have that resources to do it, they should do that when they still compete with ATI and lazying around by rebadges Geforce 2 mx to became Geforce 4 mx and wasting money by giving 3dfx team to develop a Geforce 5.

For the Intel part, first the delay the K10 (Phenom 2008) which should be compete with Core 2, then after that got TLB bug with that one too... Then Bulldozer released (2011) which they should be compete with Nehalem but even Intel Core 2 processor or K10 can still beat bulldozer in not heavily thread software. Then comes Piledriver, which the bulldozer should be but still unable to beat Nehalem in benchmark (well, maybe some program faster)

So Intel Core, Nehalem, Sandy Bridge now Haswell
AMD K10, Bulldozer, Piledriver (which is still struggling to even beat Nehalem)

You really need to work on your english bro, that hurt my brain to read. I'm still none the wiser :confused:
 

Sagia86

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
13 (0.00/day)
You really need to work on your english bro, that hurt my brain to read. I'm still none the wiser

hahaha, that what you get when you can speak 5 different languages
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
2,452 (0.55/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name Sandfiller
Processor I5-10400
Motherboard MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS
Cooling Noctua NH-L9i (92x25mm fan)
Memory 32GB Corsair LPX 2400 Mhz DDR4 CL14
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700 XT GAMING X
Storage Intel 670P 512GB
Display(s) 2560x1080 LG 29" + 22" LG
Case SS RV02
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Fractal Design IntegraM 650W
Mouse Logitech Triathlon
Keyboard REDRAGON MITRA
Software Windows 11 Home x 64
I really like that cooler design. Too bad its a Palit offbrand.

Care to elaborate? I've had two Palit cards for the last few years, before them I had Galaxy and Asus and they all worked perfectly fine. Palit is cheaper and doesn't have "super alloy power" etc proprietary techs, but it gets the job done.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
9,762 (1.91/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel Xeon X3470
Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. P55A-UD3R (Socket 1156)
Cooling Enermax ETS-T40F
Memory Samsung 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3
Video Card(s) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Storage V-GEN03AS18EU120GB, Seagate 2 x 1TB and Seagate 4TB
Display(s) Samsung 21 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case Icute Super 18
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply Silverstone 600 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Sades Excalibur + Taihao keycaps
Software Win 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
I think the card is shopped on to the guys lap in the first pic. Some weird stuff going on with the PCI-E slot and... dat drop shadow!

yeah. i just think the same too.
but the card looks nice and from outside looks pretty solid
 
Top