• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

1080p (144Hz) vs. 1440p (144Hz) for 2 GTX 780Ti's (SC)in SLI [Long Term]

1080p (144Hz) vs. 1440p (144Hz)

  • Asus VG248QE; 1080p; 144 Hz; G-Sync pre-installed

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
44 (0.01/day)
System Name Long Term Gaming Build
Processor i7-4770K
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Hero
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory GSkill Ripjaw X 2133
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 Ti ACX Superclock (x2 SLI)
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB and Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster PX2370 (23inch)
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Seasonic X-1000 Platinum
Hello All,

So I am trying to decide on a monitor upgrade for my newly built computer.

I am looking for a monitor that has a refresh rate greater than 120 Hz (144 Hz is good) and has G-Sync. I like the ability to turn my settings to high or ultra if the option is there and I tend to crank up the AA (I am not sure if high AA is needed on a 1440p monitor). I normally play games like Mass Effect, Bioshock, Dragon Age, Fallout and Guild Wars 2 and I plan on playing any new iteration of those games as well (Mass Effect 4, Dragon Age Inquisition, ect).

My current computer build will be with me for the next 4-5 years, so I do not plan on upgrading the GPU’s until at least at least 4-5 years from now (this is due to budgetary issues).

I want to make sure that the monitor that I choose will be utilized fully. I do not want to get a monitor where in a year or two my 780Ti’s won’t be able to push more than 60 Hz without having to drop the settings significantly.
My two choices are:
Choice 1: Asus ROG Swift PG278Q; 1440p; 144 Hz; G-Sync
Choice 2: Asus VG248QE; 1080p; 144 Hz; G-Sync pre-installed

Thank you in advance!!
 
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
44 (0.01/day)
System Name Long Term Gaming Build
Processor i7-4770K
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Hero
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory GSkill Ripjaw X 2133
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 Ti ACX Superclock (x2 SLI)
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB and Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster PX2370 (23inch)
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Seasonic X-1000 Platinum
Just to clarify, I currently have 2 GTX 780Ti's in SLI
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Messages
6,862 (1.16/day)
Location
S.E. Virginia
System Name Barb's Domain
Processor i9 10850k 5.1GHz all cores
Motherboard MSI MPG Z490 GAMING EDGE WIFI
Cooling Deep Cool Assassin III
Memory 2*16gig Corsair LPX DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) RTX 4080 FE
Storage 500gb Samsung 980 Pro M2 SSD, 500GB WD Blue SATA SSD, 2TB Seagate Hybrid SSHD
Display(s) Dell - S3222DGM 32" 2k Curved/ASUS VP28UQG 28" 4K (ran at 2k), Sanyo 75" 4k TV
Case SilverStone Fortress FT04
Audio Device(s) Bose Companion II speakers, Corsair - HS70 PRO headphones
Power Supply Corsair RM850x (2021)
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech Orion Spectrum G910
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/34962882
While most games won't be a issue, I'm pretty sure there will be some games released in 2 years that a 780ti SLI will not push highest settings at 60 fps at 1080p, I know there will be at 1440p. I think you are expecting too much.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,587 (6.72/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
If you're going the G-Sync route 144 Hz really isn't needed. There's even a pretty good difference with and without G-Sync at 30fps. Go for the 1440p.. but you don't necessarily need the 144 Hz.
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,945 (2.60/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
If you're going the G-Sync route 144 Hz really isn't needed. There's even a pretty good difference with and without G-Sync at 30fps. Go for the 1440p.. but you don't necessarily need the 144 Hz.

The only monitors releasing with G-Sync so far are TN panels at 120-144hz. Though you are right you don't need to fully utilize that high of refresh rate to see the benefits of g-sync.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.62/day)
I say forget 1440P, and get an awesome huge 1080p TV.

or a 24-inch 1200p monitor.

I run into buffer limits already @ 1200p on 780ti (I currently have three cards). Not on many titles, but it's there.


VGAs are kind of designed to meet resolution needs. if you want to run 1440p or 1600p like I do ,(or surround, for that matter), I really suggest 6 GB cards. If that's the case, and you have 6 GB cards, then 1440p, all the way. That's why those cards exist - 1440p to 4K use.
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,945 (2.60/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
I say forget 1440P, and get an awesome huge 1080p TV.

or a 24-inch 1200p monitor.

I run into buffer limits already @ 1200p on 780ti (I currently have three cards).

I'm kind of at that point too, I wanted 1440p for the longest time, but I'm sticking with what I have till I can afford 4k and 1 or 2 gpus to run it.

My interest in multi monitor has gone up quite a bit lately too.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
1,109 (0.19/day)
Location
Greenville, NC
System Name Champ's 1440P Rig
Processor Intel i7-4770K @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H60
Memory Corsair Vengeance 16GB 1600 Mhz 4x4 Blue Ram
Video Card(s) Nvidia 1080 FE
Storage Samsung 840 Evo 256 GB/RAID 0 Western Digital Blue 1 TB HDDs
Display(s) Acer XG270HU
Case Antec P100
Power Supply Corsair CX850M
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard TT eSports Poseidon
Software Windows 10
I say forget 1440P, and get an awesome huge 1080p TV.

or a 24-inch 1200p monitor.

I run into buffer limits already @ 1200p on 780ti (I currently have three cards). Not on many titles, but it's there.


VGAs are kind of designed to meet resolution needs. if you want to run 1440p or 1600p like I do ,(or surround, for that matter), I really suggest 6 GB cards. If that's the case, and you have 6 GB cards, then 1440p, all the way. That's why those cards exist - 1440p to 4K use.

That's what I did. 60". Nothing better than chilling on the couch and playing your favorite games maxed out.
 

Laeddis

New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
I know this thread is a few weeks old, but I'll give my thoughts anyways, as I have been looking to the 1080p versus 1440p for some time now ever since hearing about the ROG 144Hz 1440p G-Sync monitor. I recently purchased a GTX 780ti SC and this thing destroys 1080p. I'm playing all my games with 100+ FPS, sometimes exceeding that. I run on a BenQ XL2420T so I have a 120Hz refresh rate, and the experience of utilizing the full refresh rate while having V-Sync on BF3 or another gamer where the frames always exceed 120 is truly remarkable. Some say diminishing returns for the fresh occurs at about 120, so I can't say that 144Hz is going to look exceptionally different, but I know that I have a tendency to notice stutters and frame increases/decreases a lot more than others so perhaps it would make a difference to me.

Since I'm getting amazing frames with a single GTX 780ti, I'd imagine that you are tearing it up with two. I think those could definitely last you for 4-5 years if you're playing at 1080p, but I doubt I could say the same for 1440p. Still, I would recommend the ROG monitor. From what I have seen, they have put so much time and thought into its engineering that it will cover all the bases. It has been said that there really isn't a use for G-Sync AND 144Hz, but I would argue differently. The G-Sync functionality will come into play with your desire to keep your GPUs for an extended length of the time. You'll start gaming at 1440p on the current generation of games and with two GTX 780ti cards you'll be shredding it up, probably pushing 100+ frames in everything you play. Still, G-Sync comes into use here with frame fluctuations, and it still eliminates tearing and stuttering without any input lag. It's going to offer benefits even if you're not at the lowest frame rates. As time goes on and graphics improve, your frames may drop, but then G-Sync becomes more and more useful. The smoothness of the games you're playing can be maintained to dramatically increase the longevity of your build.

1440p enables you to use less AA as well. At 27" and 1440p, the ROG monitor will have a much higher pixel density than your 1080p monitor, so you'll be able to maintain the quality of the resolution even at closer distances. My final point would be saying that there will be a natural transition to 1440p from 1080p. I don't think 4K will be utilized for a long time, because graphics cards can't push high frames on that resolution and I think you've got the same mindset as me; smoothness over resolution. That being said, the 780ti's are the answer to 1440p. Finally we're able to push past 1080p while not sacrificing amazing framerates. If you get a 1080p monitor now, the chances are that you're going to upgrade your monitor after the 4-5 years anyways because the cards then will be shredding it on 1440p and provide the best experience. I think the ROG monitor will be the best future proofing you can do, since after 4-5 years, upgrading your cards would push you back up to using the high refresh rate while also enjoying the enhanced resolution.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.93/day)
I have the VG248QE and it's awesome. Don't really see a need for G-Sync if games run at framerate slightly below 144fps. Also prefer 1080p becauswe of content with same res that then goes nicely edge to edge without any fiddling or distortions.
 
Top