• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Choose R9 290 Series for its 512-bit Memory Bus: AMD

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,283 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
In one of the first interviews post GeForce GTX 900 series, AMD maintained that its Radeon R9 290 series products are still competitive. Speaking in an interview with TweakTown, Corporate Vice President of Global Channel Sales, Roy Taylor, said that gamers should choose the Radeon R9 290X "with its 512-bit memory bus" at its current price of US $370. He stated that the current low pricing with R9 290 series is due to "ongoing promotions within the channel," and that AMD didn't make an official price adjustment on its end. Taylor dodged questions on when AMD plans to launch its next high-end graphics products, whether they'll level up to the GTX 900 series, and on whether AMD is working with DICE on "Battlefield 5." You can find the full interview in the source link, below.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
5,380 (1.08/day)
There's no need to tell AMD that the GTX 900 launch critically damaged R9 290 series viability. They know that. Luckily, the R9 290 street price is at about 270$. Which is somewhat compeling to those who insist on red. It is still in a better price to performance ratio. Now, power and drivers or at-launch optimization? well...

All there's left to do is wait for their next series i guess.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,389 (0.98/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> ... nope still the same :'(
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
damn it amd, I want a new card, GET TO IT
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,655 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Considering the number of high end cards sold out again both companies are doing well enough.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
338 (0.10/day)
Location
Marabá - Pará - Brazil
System Name KarymidoN TitaN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF X570
Cooling Custom Watercooling Loop
Memory 2x Kingston FURY RGB 16gb @ 3200mhz 18-20-20-39
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 GAMING X 8GB
Storage Kingston NV2 1TB| 4TB HDD
Display(s) 4X 1080P LG Monitors
Case Thermaltake Core V71
Power Supply Corsair TX 600
Mouse Logitech G300S
when AMD learn to optimize energy consumption and make a decent stock cooling system, so Nvidia will have competition. Today AMD has stratospheric consumption of energy with poorly optimized drivers and ridiculously high (I have a CrossfireX).
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
4,012 (0.75/day)
Location
Sarasota, Florida, USA
System Name Awesomesauce 4.3 | Laptop (MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro-023)
Processor Intel Core i7-5820K 4.16GHz 1.28v/3GHz 1.05v uncore | Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 3.1GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WiFi LGA2011-v3| Stock
Cooling Corsair H100i v2 w/ 2x EK Vardar F4-120ER + various 120/140mm case fans | Stock
Memory G.Skill RJ-4 16GB DDR4-2666 CL15 quad channel | 12GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti Hybrid SC2 11GB @ 2012/5151 boost | NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB +200/+500 + Intel 530
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 500GB + Seagate 3TB 7200RPM + others | Kingston 256GB M.2 SATA + 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) Acer G257HU 1440p 60Hz AH-IPS 4ms | 17.3" 1920*1080 60Hz wide angle TN notebook panel
Case Fractal Design Define XL R2 | MSI
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | Realtek with quad stereo speakers and subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850i Platinum | 19.5v 180w Delta brick
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 | Windows 10 Home x64
The GM204 is a little lean on memory bandwidth, even with 8GHz GDDR5 (I can hit ~90% memory controller utilization in Furmark at ~1300MHz core clock), but it still eats my R9 290 for breakfast.

It's like saying "choose AMD FX-8350 for 8 integer cores" when a Core i5 has the same amount of FPUs and is completely competitive with half the integer cores.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,209 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
If you can't get an R290, you can maybe find a 2900XT somewhere, that too has a 512-bit memory bus, and everyone knows more bits is better.
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
46 (0.01/day)
Location
Madison, WI
I would have gotten an R9 290 or 290X had I not known about their black screen issue and all the driver-related problems. Did research for a couple months and it still seems like "I will get a beast of a card if I get lucky". I was on AMD for 2 generations - 5830 and 6950 - the 5830 had the black screen problem and driver crashes for a while and it was really annoying while the 6950 was a beast. Until AMD finally figures out how to write proper drivers I will stay with nVidia. It's 2014 and they still manage to churn out drivers that work worse compared to previous versions. Surely nVidia has problems too but they don't seem to affect me that much.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
239 (0.04/day)
I would have gotten an R9 290 or 290X had I not known about their black screen issue and all the driver-related problems. Did research for a couple months and it still seems like "I will get a beast of a card if I get lucky". I was on AMD for 2 generations - 5830 and 6950 - the 5830 had the black screen problem and driver crashes for a while and it was really annoying while the 6950 was a beast. Until AMD finally figures out how to write proper drivers I will stay with nVidia. It's 2014 and they still manage to churn out drivers that work worse compared to previous versions. Surely nVidia has problems too but they don't seem to affect me that much.

I have had an X850 Pro, X1900 Pro, 2 x 2900 Pro Crossfire, HD 4870 - HD 4890 Crossfire, 2 x HD 6950 and I now have a R9 290X Reference model. (XFX) So far, I have not had any driver issues, black screens, gray screens, BSODs (Unless I created them myself) nor any other issues. The drivers are actually quite good so far, not perfect but good enough for me.

Last Nvidia product I owned was a 6600GT. I just do not see any reason to switch when I have not personally had any issues. Also, going with the 512 Bit bus on these cards is a good reason to get one if you need the bandwidth. Oh, and I did have a 9800 Pro back in the day as well without any issues that I can remember. Honestly, I think problems come down more to hardware combinations than anything else.
 

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.24/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
There's no need to tell AMD that the GTX 900 launch critically damaged R9 290 series viability. They know that. Luckily, the R9 290 street price is at about 270$. Which is somewhat compeling to those who insist on red. It is still in a better price to performance ratio. Now, power and drivers or at-launch optimization? well...

All there's left to do is wait for their next series i guess.

I can't remember the last time I had an issue with AMD drivers. Oh wait, yeah I can, 4 years ago in 2010, and it was an easy fix. Before that, I can't remember...
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
102 (0.02/day)
The $190 used on Ebay is my price point. Thank you Nvidia, i have never and will never pay more than $200 for a single component.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,875 (0.84/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Boomer Master Race
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 4.2Ghz - 5Ghz CPU
Motherboard MSI B650I Edge Wifi ITX Motherboard
Cooling CM 280mm AIO + 2x 120mm Slim fans
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4060 8GB (Temporary Until Next Gen)
Storage Kingston KC3000 M.2 1TB + 2TB HDD
Display(s) Asus TUF 24Inch 165Hz || AOC 24Inch 180Hz
Case Cooler Master NR200P Max TG ITX Case
Audio Device(s) Built In Realtek Digital Audio HD
Power Supply CoolerMaster V850 SFX Gold 850W PSU
Mouse Logitech G203 Lightsync
Keyboard Atrix RGB Slim Keyboard
VR HMD ( ◔ ʖ̯ ◔ )
Software Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do them anymore.
Lolz thanks AMD but I will stick with my GTX 970 :rockout:

Give me Windows 10, DX12, More Mantle support, a 12 or 16 core CPU based on the Excavator architecture, <--- games that take advantage of those cores properly & the R9 390 series please, & I will definitely consider purchasing your hardware Nom Nom! :peace:
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.16/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
All of the Avago, Freescale, LG, MediaTek, NVIDIA, Renesas and Xilinx are on list with projects waiting the 16 nm TSMC mass production later next year.

Where is AMD?

Speaking nonsense. :lol:
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
563 (0.13/day)
Processor i5 4670K - @ 4.8GHZ core
Motherboard MSI Z87 G43
Cooling Thermalright Ultra-120 *(Modded to fit on this motherboard)
Memory 16GB 2400MHZ
Video Card(s) HD7970 GHZ edition Sapphire
Storage Samsung 120GB 850 EVO & 4X 2TB HDD (Seagate)
Display(s) 42" Panasonice LED TV @120Hz
Case Corsair 200R
Audio Device(s) Xfi Xtreme Music with Hyper X Core
Power Supply Cooler Master 700 Watts
This looks bad, Roy has no idea what he is talking about.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,866 (3.00/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
If you can't get an R290, you can maybe find a 2900XT somewhere, that too has a 512-bit memory bus, and everyone knows more bits is better.
lol, that's funny, I nearly spilled my coffee. I have a 2900XT with its 512-bit bus and an 8800 GTX with only a 384-bit bus and the 8800 GTX eats it for breakfast.

AMD better up the overall performance of their current cards rather than trying to bamboozle techies with bus width.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
48 (0.01/day)
Personally I don't think AMD is the only camp with a driver issue. Both camps in my opinion are equally meh.
I have two systems one with a R9 280X and HD7970 in crossfire, and a new MSI Gold(Bronze) edition GTX970.

The GTX970 has been having a lot of problems on Display Port with screen tearing after coming back from sleep state. Google GTX900 Display Port tearing/black screen, a lot of people have the same problem. And sometimes switching from Nvidia surround to normal triple monitor or vice versa causes BSOD on Windows7.

On the HD7970, I wouldn't say AMD had better or flawless drivers, we all know they don't. But I don't see the Nvidia drivers superior in any way.

So I think driver and feature wise, both camps are equally meh.
 

GAR

Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
137 (0.02/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.6ghz
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro 2400MHZ
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon R9 290X
Storage Samsung 500GB SSD
Display(s) Asus VG248QE 144HZ
Case Corsair Air 540
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs ZxR
Power Supply Corsair HX1050
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Its all marketing, of course im going to tell you my product is better than my competitions. That being said, the 290 is a good card but it produces too much heat and uses too much power, 100 watts more to be exact, heats up other components in your PC because of the massive heat the PCB produces, the gtx 970 is the sweet spot right now for a gpu, the 512bit bus is meaningless when a card with 256bit bus beats it, even in 4K the gtx 980 is equal to or faster than the 290x, not to mention the gtx 970/980 overclock like beasts, 1400mhz+ on all cards with most hitting 1500+ on stock cooling and even the reference models. Gsync is an amazing feature and I for one cannot go back to a non gsync monitor.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
74 (0.02/day)
System Name HAL
Processor i7 975
Motherboard Asus Rampage III
Cooling Corsair H50
Memory Patriot Viper 2000mhz 8-8-8-24
Video Card(s) HD 5970 x 2
Storage C300 256gb x 2
Case Corsair 800D
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
I use both GTX 980s and R9 290Xs. I have 4 of each and find the 980s are better most of the time @1080p and the 290Xs are better most of the time @4K.

With these cards it comes down to what games and resolutions you use as there is no clear winner.
 

f2bnp

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2011
Messages
182 (0.04/day)
Location
Indonesia
I change from a 290x to a 970. It maybe not be faster, but it sure is more convenient.
For me the 970 is Is cooler, consume less watt, and the noise level is more silent then my 290x.
All of those non-performance improvement really makes the 970 beats my old 290x.
And sadly my experience with the 290x is not quite good. First I got an elpida memory one, which is prone to artifact on high memory clock, and i got the black screen problem when it's under heavy use. It's not psu error cause my ax1200i is enough to power 2 of those card.... Thankfully i can rma my 1st card and get a new one... But it's still an elpida one, so fml. I rma it again and ask for a non elpida one, and finally i got it. Which is perfect, no black screen and artifact. But the noise and heat really turn me down. So thats why I quickly change to a 970 when i got the chance.
The 290x sure have more bits, but it's not faster, it's louder, it's hotter, and it's consume more power.
So for me the 512bit vs 256bit is not a game breaking deal.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,665 (0.45/day)
Location
Switzerland
Processor i9 9900KS ( 5 Ghz all the time )
Motherboard Asus Maximus XI Hero Z390
Cooling EK Velocity + EK D5 pump + Alphacool full copper silver 360mm radiator
Memory 16GB Corsair Dominator GT ROG Edition 3333 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS TUF RTX 3080 Ti 12GB OC
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 970 Evo Plus 250 GB + 1TB 970 Evo Plus
Display(s) Asus PG279 IPS 1440p 165Hz G-sync
Case Cooler Master H500
Power Supply Asus ROG Thor 850W
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Rapoo
Software Win 10 64 Bit
AMD show me your FreeSync tech and make a better job to cool down your GPU's and i may think to buy a Radeon card.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
Processor AMD FX-8350 4.8GHz/1.46V
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair V Formula
Cooling Silverstone SST-TD02
Memory Patriot PV38G213C1K DDR3-2133 4GBx2
Video Card(s) PowerColor R9-290(X-mod)
Storage Plextor M5S-256GB
Case my own hand crafted
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply FSP-RAIDER 750W
Software Windows8.1 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Firestrike:8780 3DMark11:P11894 FF14ARR-CC 1080p maximum:13437
when the HBM technology is loaded into RADEON, a problem in a memory band is cleared.
there is no need to increase the secondary cache as Maxwell.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
929 (0.18/day)
System Name Desktop | Laptop
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Intel Core i7 7700HQ
Motherboard MAG X570S Torpedo Max| Neptune KLS HM175
Cooling Corsair H100x | Twin fan, fin stack & heat pipes
Memory 32GB G.Skill F4-3600C16-8GVK @ 3600MHz / 16-16-16-36-1T | 16GB DDR4 @ 2400MHz / 17-17-17-39-2T
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra | GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB + Kingston KC3000 2TB + Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) 32" Dell G3223Q (2160p @ 144Hz) | 17" IPS 1920x1080P
Case Fractal Meshify 2 Compact | Aspire V Nitro BE
Audio Device(s) ifi Audio ZEN DAC V2 + Focal Radiance / HyperX Solocast
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex V Platinum Pro 1000W | 150W
Mouse Razer Viper Ultimate | Logitech MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Razer Huntsman V2 Optical (Linear Red)
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
AMD maintained that its Radeon R9 290 series products are still competitive.

This to me sounds like they are in no rush to bring out their next generation of GPUs.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
16 (0.00/day)
System Name Bleh
Processor Intel Core i5 750 2.66GHz w/ 2.8GHz Turbo
Motherboard Some Dell Mobo (no OC)
Cooling Intel i7 1150 Stock Cooler
Memory 2x4GB 1600MHz (works as 1333MHz thanks to the old architecture)
Video Card(s) I really don't want to say. I am ashamed of it
Storage 320GB Spinpoint 7200RPM
Display(s) LG 22" 16:10 1680x1050
Case Gigabyte 3DAurora 570 Aluminium Case
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply BeQuiet 430 Watt 80+
Mouse What?
Keyboard What what?
Software Windows 7 x64, Ubuntu Mate x64 (Soon to transition to Linux alone)
Yeah, and I wonder why people are so mean to AMD. At least they try to please the gaming community with low prices and good products. Maybe they are not the best, but the price is great. Hell, people do you remember 700$ GTX 780 Ti? And 3000$ Titan Z?
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.16/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
This to me sounds like they are in no rush to bring out their next generation of GPUs.

Yeah, and I wonder why people are so mean to AMD. At least they try to please the gaming community with low prices and good products. Maybe they are not the best, but the price is great. Hell, people do you remember 700$ GTX 780 Ti? And 3000$ Titan Z?

AMD's products' at the moment are in competitive inferiority and that's why the prices are such, both of them are responsible for it.

The bad things for AMD are yet to come if they are indeed "not in a rush". :(
 
Top