- Joined
- Dec 10, 2007
- Messages
- 88 (0.01/day)
Processor | QX9650, 4@1.36v 11x365 |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus p45q-e |
Cooling | Prolimatech Super Mega Cooler (Akasa Viper push/pull) |
Memory | OCZ 8GB (4x2GB) PC2-6400C4 800MHz ReaperX HPC Enhanced Bandwidth Edition Dual Channel DDR2 |
Video Card(s) | HIS 6970 ATI HD |
Storage | 1TB |
Display(s) | 30" dell 3008, 2x19" samsumg syncmaster |
Case | Antec P180 |
Audio Device(s) | PCI XFi SB |
Power Supply | 800wat Tagan |
Software | Windows 7 x64 |
Benchmark Scores | 14500 3dmark 06 @ 2500x1600 8AA 22000 3dmark 06 @ defaults 4800 3dmark 11 @ defaults |
Hello clever people,
I just bought another SSD (Crucial MX100) and was benching it against my existing Samsung 840 which I use as primary partition. In doing so I get the following results:
Two disks:
..samsung 840 is 150/250gb full, ACHI on, condition good, write caching OFF
..crucial mx100 is 100/500gb full
Both are using
using ATTO:
Samsung 840 results: Awful write speeds
Curical results: Seems a good job, pretty fast and meets the stated specifications.
Any thoughts on what I can do to determine why the Samsung is performing like an old tart?
I just bought another SSD (Crucial MX100) and was benching it against my existing Samsung 840 which I use as primary partition. In doing so I get the following results:
Two disks:
..samsung 840 is 150/250gb full, ACHI on, condition good, write caching OFF
..crucial mx100 is 100/500gb full
Both are using
using ATTO:
Samsung 840 results: Awful write speeds
Curical results: Seems a good job, pretty fast and meets the stated specifications.
Any thoughts on what I can do to determine why the Samsung is performing like an old tart?